The Surgical Apgar Score

Objectives:. To review the current literature evaluating the performance of the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS). Background:. The SAS is a simple metric calculated at the end of surgery that provides clinicians with information about a patient’s postoperative risk of morbidity and mortality. The SAS diff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD, Elijah Dixon, BSc, MSc (Epi), MD, FRCSC, FACS, Kaylene Duttchen, BSc (Pharm), MD, FRCPC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-12-01
Series:Annals of Surgery Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000227
_version_ 1797859611261272064
author Elliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD
Elijah Dixon, BSc, MSc (Epi), MD, FRCSC, FACS
Kaylene Duttchen, BSc (Pharm), MD, FRCPC
author_facet Elliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD
Elijah Dixon, BSc, MSc (Epi), MD, FRCSC, FACS
Kaylene Duttchen, BSc (Pharm), MD, FRCPC
author_sort Elliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD
collection DOAJ
description Objectives:. To review the current literature evaluating the performance of the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS). Background:. The SAS is a simple metric calculated at the end of surgery that provides clinicians with information about a patient’s postoperative risk of morbidity and mortality. The SAS differs from other prognostic models in that it is calculated from intraoperative rather than preoperative parameters. The SAS was originally derived and validated in a general and vascular surgery population. Since its inception, it has been evaluated in many other surgical disciplines, large heterogeneous surgical populations, and various countries. Methods:. A database and gray literature search was performed on March 3, 2020. Identified articles were reviewed for applicability and study quality with prespecified inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and quality requirements. Thirty-six observational studies are included for review. Data were systematically extracted and tabulated independently and in duplicate by two investigators with differences resolved by consensus. Results:. All 36 included studies reported metrics of discrimination. When using the SAS to correctly identify postoperative morbidity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or concordance-statistic ranged from 0.59 in a general orthopedic surgery population to 0.872 in an orthopedic spine surgery population. When using the SAS to identify mortality, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or concordance-statistic ranged from 0.63 in a combined surgical population to 0.92 in a general and vascular surgery population. Conclusions:. The SAS provides a moderate and consistent degree of discrimination for postoperative morbidity and mortality across multiple surgical disciplines.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T21:33:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37e54a149a7f45a8aaf92abf662eb10f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2691-3593
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T21:33:29Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format Article
series Annals of Surgery Open
spelling doaj.art-37e54a149a7f45a8aaf92abf662eb10f2023-03-27T06:41:35ZengWolters Kluwer HealthAnnals of Surgery Open2691-35932022-12-0134e22710.1097/AS9.0000000000000227202212000-00025The Surgical Apgar ScoreElliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD0Elijah Dixon, BSc, MSc (Epi), MD, FRCSC, FACS1Kaylene Duttchen, BSc (Pharm), MD, FRCPC2From the * Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada† Department of General Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Professor of Surgery, Oncology, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada‡ Department of Anesthesiology, Foothills Medical Centre, Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada.Objectives:. To review the current literature evaluating the performance of the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS). Background:. The SAS is a simple metric calculated at the end of surgery that provides clinicians with information about a patient’s postoperative risk of morbidity and mortality. The SAS differs from other prognostic models in that it is calculated from intraoperative rather than preoperative parameters. The SAS was originally derived and validated in a general and vascular surgery population. Since its inception, it has been evaluated in many other surgical disciplines, large heterogeneous surgical populations, and various countries. Methods:. A database and gray literature search was performed on March 3, 2020. Identified articles were reviewed for applicability and study quality with prespecified inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and quality requirements. Thirty-six observational studies are included for review. Data were systematically extracted and tabulated independently and in duplicate by two investigators with differences resolved by consensus. Results:. All 36 included studies reported metrics of discrimination. When using the SAS to correctly identify postoperative morbidity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or concordance-statistic ranged from 0.59 in a general orthopedic surgery population to 0.872 in an orthopedic spine surgery population. When using the SAS to identify mortality, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or concordance-statistic ranged from 0.63 in a combined surgical population to 0.92 in a general and vascular surgery population. Conclusions:. The SAS provides a moderate and consistent degree of discrimination for postoperative morbidity and mortality across multiple surgical disciplines.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000227
spellingShingle Elliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD
Elijah Dixon, BSc, MSc (Epi), MD, FRCSC, FACS
Kaylene Duttchen, BSc (Pharm), MD, FRCPC
The Surgical Apgar Score
Annals of Surgery Open
title The Surgical Apgar Score
title_full The Surgical Apgar Score
title_fullStr The Surgical Apgar Score
title_full_unstemmed The Surgical Apgar Score
title_short The Surgical Apgar Score
title_sort surgical apgar score
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000227
work_keys_str_mv AT elliotpittmanbscpharmpharmdmd thesurgicalapgarscore
AT elijahdixonbscmscepimdfrcscfacs thesurgicalapgarscore
AT kayleneduttchenbscpharmmdfrcpc thesurgicalapgarscore
AT elliotpittmanbscpharmpharmdmd surgicalapgarscore
AT elijahdixonbscmscepimdfrcscfacs surgicalapgarscore
AT kayleneduttchenbscpharmmdfrcpc surgicalapgarscore