The Surgical Apgar Score
Objectives:. To review the current literature evaluating the performance of the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS). Background:. The SAS is a simple metric calculated at the end of surgery that provides clinicians with information about a patient’s postoperative risk of morbidity and mortality. The SAS diff...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Annals of Surgery Open |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000227 |
_version_ | 1797859611261272064 |
---|---|
author | Elliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD Elijah Dixon, BSc, MSc (Epi), MD, FRCSC, FACS Kaylene Duttchen, BSc (Pharm), MD, FRCPC |
author_facet | Elliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD Elijah Dixon, BSc, MSc (Epi), MD, FRCSC, FACS Kaylene Duttchen, BSc (Pharm), MD, FRCPC |
author_sort | Elliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objectives:. To review the current literature evaluating the performance of the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS).
Background:. The SAS is a simple metric calculated at the end of surgery that provides clinicians with information about a patient’s postoperative risk of morbidity and mortality. The SAS differs from other prognostic models in that it is calculated from intraoperative rather than preoperative parameters. The SAS was originally derived and validated in a general and vascular surgery population. Since its inception, it has been evaluated in many other surgical disciplines, large heterogeneous surgical populations, and various countries.
Methods:. A database and gray literature search was performed on March 3, 2020. Identified articles were reviewed for applicability and study quality with prespecified inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and quality requirements. Thirty-six observational studies are included for review. Data were systematically extracted and tabulated independently and in duplicate by two investigators with differences resolved by consensus.
Results:. All 36 included studies reported metrics of discrimination. When using the SAS to correctly identify postoperative morbidity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or concordance-statistic ranged from 0.59 in a general orthopedic surgery population to 0.872 in an orthopedic spine surgery population. When using the SAS to identify mortality, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or concordance-statistic ranged from 0.63 in a combined surgical population to 0.92 in a general and vascular surgery population.
Conclusions:. The SAS provides a moderate and consistent degree of discrimination for postoperative morbidity and mortality across multiple surgical disciplines. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-09T21:33:29Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-37e54a149a7f45a8aaf92abf662eb10f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2691-3593 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-09T21:33:29Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | Article |
series | Annals of Surgery Open |
spelling | doaj.art-37e54a149a7f45a8aaf92abf662eb10f2023-03-27T06:41:35ZengWolters Kluwer HealthAnnals of Surgery Open2691-35932022-12-0134e22710.1097/AS9.0000000000000227202212000-00025The Surgical Apgar ScoreElliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD0Elijah Dixon, BSc, MSc (Epi), MD, FRCSC, FACS1Kaylene Duttchen, BSc (Pharm), MD, FRCPC2From the * Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada† Department of General Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Professor of Surgery, Oncology, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada‡ Department of Anesthesiology, Foothills Medical Centre, Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada.Objectives:. To review the current literature evaluating the performance of the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS). Background:. The SAS is a simple metric calculated at the end of surgery that provides clinicians with information about a patient’s postoperative risk of morbidity and mortality. The SAS differs from other prognostic models in that it is calculated from intraoperative rather than preoperative parameters. The SAS was originally derived and validated in a general and vascular surgery population. Since its inception, it has been evaluated in many other surgical disciplines, large heterogeneous surgical populations, and various countries. Methods:. A database and gray literature search was performed on March 3, 2020. Identified articles were reviewed for applicability and study quality with prespecified inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and quality requirements. Thirty-six observational studies are included for review. Data were systematically extracted and tabulated independently and in duplicate by two investigators with differences resolved by consensus. Results:. All 36 included studies reported metrics of discrimination. When using the SAS to correctly identify postoperative morbidity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or concordance-statistic ranged from 0.59 in a general orthopedic surgery population to 0.872 in an orthopedic spine surgery population. When using the SAS to identify mortality, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or concordance-statistic ranged from 0.63 in a combined surgical population to 0.92 in a general and vascular surgery population. Conclusions:. The SAS provides a moderate and consistent degree of discrimination for postoperative morbidity and mortality across multiple surgical disciplines.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000227 |
spellingShingle | Elliot Pittman, BSc (Pharm), PharmD, MD Elijah Dixon, BSc, MSc (Epi), MD, FRCSC, FACS Kaylene Duttchen, BSc (Pharm), MD, FRCPC The Surgical Apgar Score Annals of Surgery Open |
title | The Surgical Apgar Score |
title_full | The Surgical Apgar Score |
title_fullStr | The Surgical Apgar Score |
title_full_unstemmed | The Surgical Apgar Score |
title_short | The Surgical Apgar Score |
title_sort | surgical apgar score |
url | http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elliotpittmanbscpharmpharmdmd thesurgicalapgarscore AT elijahdixonbscmscepimdfrcscfacs thesurgicalapgarscore AT kayleneduttchenbscpharmmdfrcpc thesurgicalapgarscore AT elliotpittmanbscpharmpharmdmd surgicalapgarscore AT elijahdixonbscmscepimdfrcscfacs surgicalapgarscore AT kayleneduttchenbscpharmmdfrcpc surgicalapgarscore |