Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers

Pore-size distribution (PSD) is the most critical parameter for size-exclusion virus removal filters. Yet, different dry- and wet-state porometry methods yield different pore-size values. The goal of this work is to conduct comparative analysis of nitrogen gas sorption (NGSP), liquid-liquid and cryo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon Gustafsson, Frank Westermann, Tobias Hanrieder, Laura Jung, Horst Ruppach, Albert Mihranyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-12-01
Series:Membranes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/9/1/1
_version_ 1797758288595517440
author Simon Gustafsson
Frank Westermann
Tobias Hanrieder
Laura Jung
Horst Ruppach
Albert Mihranyan
author_facet Simon Gustafsson
Frank Westermann
Tobias Hanrieder
Laura Jung
Horst Ruppach
Albert Mihranyan
author_sort Simon Gustafsson
collection DOAJ
description Pore-size distribution (PSD) is the most critical parameter for size-exclusion virus removal filters. Yet, different dry- and wet-state porometry methods yield different pore-size values. The goal of this work is to conduct comparative analysis of nitrogen gas sorption (NGSP), liquid-liquid and cryoporometry with differential scanning calorimetry (CP-DSC) methods with respect to characterization of regular and cross-linked virus removal filter paper based on cellulose nanofibers, i.e. the mille-feuille filter. The filters were further characterized with atomic force and scanning electron microscopy. Finally, the removal of the worst-case model virus, i.e. minute virus of mice (MVM; 20 nm, nonenveloped parvovirus) was evaluated. The results revealed that there is no difference of the obtained PSDs between the wet methods, i.e. DSC and liquid-liquid porometry (LLP), as well as no difference between the regular and cross-linked filters regardless of method. MVM filtration at different trans membrane pressure (TMP) revealed strong dependence of the virus removal capability on applied pressure. It was further observed that cross-linking filters showed enhanced virus removal, especially at lower TMP. In all, the results of this study highlight the complex nature of virus capture in size-exclusion filters.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:27:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-37edd7358a0846459f6be3daee35e5ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0375
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:27:49Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Membranes
spelling doaj.art-37edd7358a0846459f6be3daee35e5ec2023-08-02T08:26:41ZengMDPI AGMembranes2077-03752018-12-0191110.3390/membranes9010001membranes9010001Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter PapersSimon Gustafsson0Frank Westermann1Tobias Hanrieder2Laura Jung3Horst Ruppach4Albert Mihranyan5Division for Nanotechnology and Functional Materials, Department for Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 534, SE-751 21 Uppsala, SwedenCharles River Biopharmaceutical Services, Gottfried Hagen Str. 20, 51105 Köln, GermanyCharles River Biopharmaceutical Services, Gottfried Hagen Str. 20, 51105 Köln, GermanyCharles River Biopharmaceutical Services, Gottfried Hagen Str. 20, 51105 Köln, GermanyCharles River Biopharmaceutical Services, Gottfried Hagen Str. 20, 51105 Köln, GermanyDivision for Nanotechnology and Functional Materials, Department for Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 534, SE-751 21 Uppsala, SwedenPore-size distribution (PSD) is the most critical parameter for size-exclusion virus removal filters. Yet, different dry- and wet-state porometry methods yield different pore-size values. The goal of this work is to conduct comparative analysis of nitrogen gas sorption (NGSP), liquid-liquid and cryoporometry with differential scanning calorimetry (CP-DSC) methods with respect to characterization of regular and cross-linked virus removal filter paper based on cellulose nanofibers, i.e. the mille-feuille filter. The filters were further characterized with atomic force and scanning electron microscopy. Finally, the removal of the worst-case model virus, i.e. minute virus of mice (MVM; 20 nm, nonenveloped parvovirus) was evaluated. The results revealed that there is no difference of the obtained PSDs between the wet methods, i.e. DSC and liquid-liquid porometry (LLP), as well as no difference between the regular and cross-linked filters regardless of method. MVM filtration at different trans membrane pressure (TMP) revealed strong dependence of the virus removal capability on applied pressure. It was further observed that cross-linking filters showed enhanced virus removal, especially at lower TMP. In all, the results of this study highlight the complex nature of virus capture in size-exclusion filters.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/9/1/1gas sorption porometryliquid-liquid porometrycryoporometrymille-feuille filter, parvovirusvirus removal filter
spellingShingle Simon Gustafsson
Frank Westermann
Tobias Hanrieder
Laura Jung
Horst Ruppach
Albert Mihranyan
Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
Membranes
gas sorption porometry
liquid-liquid porometry
cryoporometry
mille-feuille filter, parvovirus
virus removal filter
title Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title_full Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title_short Comparative Analysis of Dry and Wet Porometry Methods for Characterization of Regular and Cross-Linked Virus Removal Filter Papers
title_sort comparative analysis of dry and wet porometry methods for characterization of regular and cross linked virus removal filter papers
topic gas sorption porometry
liquid-liquid porometry
cryoporometry
mille-feuille filter, parvovirus
virus removal filter
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/9/1/1
work_keys_str_mv AT simongustafsson comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers
AT frankwestermann comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers
AT tobiashanrieder comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers
AT laurajung comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers
AT horstruppach comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers
AT albertmihranyan comparativeanalysisofdryandwetporometrymethodsforcharacterizationofregularandcrosslinkedvirusremovalfilterpapers