Minimal clinically important difference: The basics

This article is part of a collaborative methodological series of narrative reviews on biostatistics and clinical epidemiology. This review aims to present basic concepts about the minimal clinically important difference and its use in the field of clinical research and evidence synthesis. The minima...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julieta Aldana Salas Apaza, Juan Víctor Ariel Franco, Nicolás Meza, Eva Madrid, Cristobal Loézar, Luis Garegnani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medwave Estudios Limitada 2021-04-01
Series:Medwave
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.medwave.cl/link.cgi/Medwave/Revisiones/MetodInvestReport/8149.act
_version_ 1818650945032028160
author Julieta Aldana Salas Apaza
Juan Víctor Ariel Franco
Nicolás Meza
Eva Madrid
Cristobal Loézar
Luis Garegnani
author_facet Julieta Aldana Salas Apaza
Juan Víctor Ariel Franco
Nicolás Meza
Eva Madrid
Cristobal Loézar
Luis Garegnani
author_sort Julieta Aldana Salas Apaza
collection DOAJ
description This article is part of a collaborative methodological series of narrative reviews on biostatistics and clinical epidemiology. This review aims to present basic concepts about the minimal clinically important difference and its use in the field of clinical research and evidence synthesis. The minimal clinically important difference is defined as the smallest difference in score in any domain or outcome of interest that patients can perceive as beneficial. It is a useful concept in several aspects since it links the magnitude of change with treatment decisions in clinical practice and emphasizes the primacy of the patient’s perception, affected by endless variables such as time, place, and current state of health, all of which can cause significant variability in results.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T01:58:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-380272b9f7944dac9b6eb3c12b54f9c9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0717-6384
0717-6384
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T01:58:16Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Medwave Estudios Limitada
record_format Article
series Medwave
spelling doaj.art-380272b9f7944dac9b6eb3c12b54f9c92022-12-21T22:07:53ZengMedwave Estudios LimitadaMedwave0717-63840717-63842021-04-012103e8149e814910.5867/medwave.2021.03.8149Minimal clinically important difference: The basicsJulieta Aldana Salas Apaza0Juan Víctor Ariel Franco1Nicolás Meza2Eva Madrid3Cristobal Loézar4Luis Garegnani5Universidad Nacional de La Matanza, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaInstituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, ArgentinaCentro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Salud (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Centro Asociado Cochrane Chile, Viña del Mar, ChileCentro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Salud (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Centro Asociado Cochrane Chile, Viña del Mar, ChileCentro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Salud (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Centro Asociado Cochrane Chile, Viña del Mar, ChileInstituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, ArgentinaThis article is part of a collaborative methodological series of narrative reviews on biostatistics and clinical epidemiology. This review aims to present basic concepts about the minimal clinically important difference and its use in the field of clinical research and evidence synthesis. The minimal clinically important difference is defined as the smallest difference in score in any domain or outcome of interest that patients can perceive as beneficial. It is a useful concept in several aspects since it links the magnitude of change with treatment decisions in clinical practice and emphasizes the primacy of the patient’s perception, affected by endless variables such as time, place, and current state of health, all of which can cause significant variability in results.https://www.medwave.cl/link.cgi/Medwave/Revisiones/MetodInvestReport/8149.actevidence-based medicineevidence-based practiceminimal clinically important differencepatient reported outcome measuressystematic reviews as topicgrade approach
spellingShingle Julieta Aldana Salas Apaza
Juan Víctor Ariel Franco
Nicolás Meza
Eva Madrid
Cristobal Loézar
Luis Garegnani
Minimal clinically important difference: The basics
Medwave
evidence-based medicine
evidence-based practice
minimal clinically important difference
patient reported outcome measures
systematic reviews as topic
grade approach
title Minimal clinically important difference: The basics
title_full Minimal clinically important difference: The basics
title_fullStr Minimal clinically important difference: The basics
title_full_unstemmed Minimal clinically important difference: The basics
title_short Minimal clinically important difference: The basics
title_sort minimal clinically important difference the basics
topic evidence-based medicine
evidence-based practice
minimal clinically important difference
patient reported outcome measures
systematic reviews as topic
grade approach
url https://www.medwave.cl/link.cgi/Medwave/Revisiones/MetodInvestReport/8149.act
work_keys_str_mv AT julietaaldanasalasapaza minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencethebasics
AT juanvictorarielfranco minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencethebasics
AT nicolasmeza minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencethebasics
AT evamadrid minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencethebasics
AT cristoballoezar minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencethebasics
AT luisgaregnani minimalclinicallyimportantdifferencethebasics