Minimal clinically important difference: The basics
This article is part of a collaborative methodological series of narrative reviews on biostatistics and clinical epidemiology. This review aims to present basic concepts about the minimal clinically important difference and its use in the field of clinical research and evidence synthesis. The minima...
Main Authors: | Julieta Aldana Salas Apaza, Juan Víctor Ariel Franco, Nicolás Meza, Eva Madrid, Cristobal Loézar, Luis Garegnani |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Medwave Estudios Limitada
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Medwave |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.medwave.cl/link.cgi/Medwave/Revisiones/MetodInvestReport/8149.act |
Similar Items
-
The GRADE approach, Part 1: how to assess the certainty of the evidence
by: Matías Kirmayr, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Graphical representation of the body of the evidence: the essentials for understanding the evidence gap map approach
by: Bastián Schuller-Martínez, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Rapid reviews: definitions and uses
by: Luis Tapia-Benavente, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Assessment of the strength of recommendation and quality of evidence: GRADE checklist. A descriptive study
by: Camila Torres Bezerra, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Systematic reviews: Key concepts for health professionals
by: Nadia Sgarbossa, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)