Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values

Abstract The Centiloid Project describes a post-hoc data transformation to standardize amyloid PET measurements to enable direct data comparisons across sites and studies using differing acquisition/analysis methods. It uses linear regression that transforms values using different measurement scales...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher G. Schwarz, Nirubol Tosakulwong, Matthew L. Senjem, Jeffrey L. Gunter, Terry M. Therneau, Prashanthi Vemuri, Val J. Lowe, Clifford R. Jack
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2018-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25459-9
_version_ 1818428238419984384
author Christopher G. Schwarz
Nirubol Tosakulwong
Matthew L. Senjem
Jeffrey L. Gunter
Terry M. Therneau
Prashanthi Vemuri
Val J. Lowe
Clifford R. Jack
author_facet Christopher G. Schwarz
Nirubol Tosakulwong
Matthew L. Senjem
Jeffrey L. Gunter
Terry M. Therneau
Prashanthi Vemuri
Val J. Lowe
Clifford R. Jack
author_sort Christopher G. Schwarz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The Centiloid Project describes a post-hoc data transformation to standardize amyloid PET measurements to enable direct data comparisons across sites and studies using differing acquisition/analysis methods. It uses linear regression that transforms values using different measurement scales to match those from a standard Centiloid unit scale. Our group’s measurement method differs from the Centiloid’s standard method in both acquisition and analysis methods. In this work we examine multiple variations for performing these transformations and compare several approaches. We hypothesized that using Deming regression, which accounts for error on both axes, would produce a more optimal transformation than the recommended standard linear regression. We also examined the effects of performing separate regressions for differences in acquisition and analysis methods, rather than a direct single-regression approach. Our results found that all transformation approaches had very similar performance and were within the recommended tolerance thresholds.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T14:58:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-384c32a4458e4957a1125b51825a85b5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T14:58:27Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-384c32a4458e4957a1125b51825a85b52022-12-21T22:56:56ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222018-05-01811610.1038/s41598-018-25459-9Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR valuesChristopher G. Schwarz0Nirubol Tosakulwong1Matthew L. Senjem2Jeffrey L. Gunter3Terry M. Therneau4Prashanthi Vemuri5Val J. Lowe6Clifford R. Jack7Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and FoundationDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic and FoundationDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and FoundationDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and FoundationDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic and FoundationDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and FoundationDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and FoundationDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and FoundationAbstract The Centiloid Project describes a post-hoc data transformation to standardize amyloid PET measurements to enable direct data comparisons across sites and studies using differing acquisition/analysis methods. It uses linear regression that transforms values using different measurement scales to match those from a standard Centiloid unit scale. Our group’s measurement method differs from the Centiloid’s standard method in both acquisition and analysis methods. In this work we examine multiple variations for performing these transformations and compare several approaches. We hypothesized that using Deming regression, which accounts for error on both axes, would produce a more optimal transformation than the recommended standard linear regression. We also examined the effects of performing separate regressions for differences in acquisition and analysis methods, rather than a direct single-regression approach. Our results found that all transformation approaches had very similar performance and were within the recommended tolerance thresholds.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25459-9
spellingShingle Christopher G. Schwarz
Nirubol Tosakulwong
Matthew L. Senjem
Jeffrey L. Gunter
Terry M. Therneau
Prashanthi Vemuri
Val J. Lowe
Clifford R. Jack
Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
Scientific Reports
title Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
title_full Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
title_fullStr Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
title_short Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
title_sort considerations for performing level 2 centiloid transformations for amyloid pet suvr values
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25459-9
work_keys_str_mv AT christophergschwarz considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT niruboltosakulwong considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT matthewlsenjem considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT jeffreylgunter considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT terrymtherneau considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT prashanthivemuri considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT valjlowe considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT cliffordrjack considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues