How the Prohormone Theory Solved Two Important Controversies in Hormonal and Neural Peptide Biosynthesis

This Prohormone Theory was simultaneously proposed in 1967 by two independent groups using two different approaches and two experimental models. Donald Steiner, in elegant pulse-chase experiments, proposed the existence of proinsulin when he observed that a human insulinoma was producing higher MW...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michel eChretien
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2013.00148/full
Description
Summary:This Prohormone Theory was simultaneously proposed in 1967 by two independent groups using two different approaches and two experimental models. Donald Steiner, in elegant pulse-chase experiments, proposed the existence of proinsulin when he observed that a human insulinoma was producing higher MW forms of immunoreactive insulin, subsequently transformed into insulin-like material (Steiner et al., 1967). Simultaneously and independently, Michel Chrétien, based on amino acid sequence homologies between three pituitary peptides, -lipotropic hormone (β-LPH), -LPH and -melanocycte-stimulating hormone (β-MSH), concluded that active peptide hormones are derived from endoproteolytic cleavages of inactive precursors, apparently at pairs of basic amino acids (Chrétien and Li, 1967). One year later, Donald Chance confirmed that the cleavage sites in proinsulin were also made of paired basic amino acids (Chance et al., 1968). This novel paradigm solved two major controversies on the biosynthesis of both insulin and neuropeptides. This short review describes how.
ISSN:1664-2392