Kant on the Rationality of Moral Judgment

The paper deals with Kant's conception of moral judgment. I start by criticizing a dominant interpretation of Kant's practical rationality in its assertion that choosing, i.e. exercising judgment consists in adopting a maxim; and adopting a maxim is equivalent to acting on a principle, giv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: kostas kokozelis
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2005-06-01
Series:حکمت و فلسفه
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_6908_b8edcb9bfd472040c04afa86bafc4aa5.pdf
_version_ 1827580858306920448
author kostas kokozelis
author_facet kostas kokozelis
author_sort kostas kokozelis
collection DOAJ
description The paper deals with Kant's conception of moral judgment. I start by criticizing a dominant interpretation of Kant's practical rationality in its assertion that choosing, i.e. exercising judgment consists in adopting a maxim; and adopting a maxim is equivalent to acting on a principle, giving oneself the moral law (Korsgaard). According to this view, the logical inescapability of choosing alivqys already places us within the normative realm. I argue that there is a further function suppressed by this view, which can be termed as approval. This takes us to the further acknowledgement that the core of Kant's practical rationality, that is, the moral question itself, is not simply one of moral knowledge [Wissen], but a broader one of cognition in general [Erkenntnis].
first_indexed 2024-03-08T22:26:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3860a0b84d1940098329e3af38a4983f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-3238
2476-6038
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T22:26:11Z
publishDate 2005-06-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series حکمت و فلسفه
spelling doaj.art-3860a0b84d1940098329e3af38a4983f2023-12-18T10:32:03ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University Pressحکمت و فلسفه1735-32382476-60382005-06-0112183010.22054/wph.2005.69086908Kant on the Rationality of Moral Judgmentkostas kokozelis0Goldsmiths College, University of LondonThe paper deals with Kant's conception of moral judgment. I start by criticizing a dominant interpretation of Kant's practical rationality in its assertion that choosing, i.e. exercising judgment consists in adopting a maxim; and adopting a maxim is equivalent to acting on a principle, giving oneself the moral law (Korsgaard). According to this view, the logical inescapability of choosing alivqys already places us within the normative realm. I argue that there is a further function suppressed by this view, which can be termed as approval. This takes us to the further acknowledgement that the core of Kant's practical rationality, that is, the moral question itself, is not simply one of moral knowledge [Wissen], but a broader one of cognition in general [Erkenntnis].https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_6908_b8edcb9bfd472040c04afa86bafc4aa5.pdfkantmoral judgmentkorsgaardpractical rationality
spellingShingle kostas kokozelis
Kant on the Rationality of Moral Judgment
حکمت و فلسفه
kant
moral judgment
korsgaard
practical rationality
title Kant on the Rationality of Moral Judgment
title_full Kant on the Rationality of Moral Judgment
title_fullStr Kant on the Rationality of Moral Judgment
title_full_unstemmed Kant on the Rationality of Moral Judgment
title_short Kant on the Rationality of Moral Judgment
title_sort kant on the rationality of moral judgment
topic kant
moral judgment
korsgaard
practical rationality
url https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_6908_b8edcb9bfd472040c04afa86bafc4aa5.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kostaskokozelis kantontherationalityofmoraljudgment