A Systems-Level Study of Ammonia and Hydrogen for Maritime Transport

An energy systems comparison of grid-electricity derived liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid ammonia (LNH3) is conducted to assess their relative potential in a low-carbon future. Under various voyage weather conditions, their performance is analysed for use in cargo transport, energy vectors for low-c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessie R. Smith, Epaminondas Mastorakos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Maritime Transport Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X23000187
_version_ 1827596315180138496
author Jessie R. Smith
Epaminondas Mastorakos
author_facet Jessie R. Smith
Epaminondas Mastorakos
author_sort Jessie R. Smith
collection DOAJ
description An energy systems comparison of grid-electricity derived liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid ammonia (LNH3) is conducted to assess their relative potential in a low-carbon future. Under various voyage weather conditions, their performance is analysed for use in cargo transport, energy vectors for low-carbon electricity transport, and fuel supply. The analysis relies on literature projections for technological development and grid decarbonisation towards 2050. Various voyages are investigated from regions such as North America (NA), Europe (E), and Latin America (LA), to regions projected to have a higher electricity and fuel grid carbon intensity (CI) (i.e., Asia Pacific, Africa, the Middle-East, and the CIS). In terms of reducing the CI of electricity and fuel at the destination port, use of LH2 is predicted to be favourable relative to LNH3, whereas LNH3 is favourable for low-carbon transport of cargo. As targeted by the International Maritime Organisation, journeys of LNH3 cargo ships originating in NA, E, and LA achieve a reduction in volumetric energy efficiency design index (kg-CO2/m3-km) of at least 70% relative to 2008 levels. The same targets can be met globally if LH2 is supplied to high CI regions for production of LNH3 for cargo transport. A future shipping system thus benefits from the use of both LH2 and LNH3 for different functions. However, there are additional challenges associated with the use of LH2. Relative to LNH3, 1.6 to 1.7 times the number of LH2 ships are required to deliver the same energy. Even when reliquefaction is employed, their success is reliant on the avoidance of rough sea states (i.e., Beaufort Numbers >= 6) where fuel depletion rates during a voyage are impractical.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T03:08:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-38649d4bbc4a41899d7752d78038bff9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-822X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T03:08:51Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Maritime Transport Research
spelling doaj.art-38649d4bbc4a41899d7752d78038bff92023-12-04T05:24:24ZengElsevierMaritime Transport Research2666-822X2023-12-015100099A Systems-Level Study of Ammonia and Hydrogen for Maritime TransportJessie R. Smith0Epaminondas Mastorakos1Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK; Corresponding author.Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK; Cambridge Centre for Advanced Research and Education in Singapore (CARES), Singapore 138602, SingaporeAn energy systems comparison of grid-electricity derived liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid ammonia (LNH3) is conducted to assess their relative potential in a low-carbon future. Under various voyage weather conditions, their performance is analysed for use in cargo transport, energy vectors for low-carbon electricity transport, and fuel supply. The analysis relies on literature projections for technological development and grid decarbonisation towards 2050. Various voyages are investigated from regions such as North America (NA), Europe (E), and Latin America (LA), to regions projected to have a higher electricity and fuel grid carbon intensity (CI) (i.e., Asia Pacific, Africa, the Middle-East, and the CIS). In terms of reducing the CI of electricity and fuel at the destination port, use of LH2 is predicted to be favourable relative to LNH3, whereas LNH3 is favourable for low-carbon transport of cargo. As targeted by the International Maritime Organisation, journeys of LNH3 cargo ships originating in NA, E, and LA achieve a reduction in volumetric energy efficiency design index (kg-CO2/m3-km) of at least 70% relative to 2008 levels. The same targets can be met globally if LH2 is supplied to high CI regions for production of LNH3 for cargo transport. A future shipping system thus benefits from the use of both LH2 and LNH3 for different functions. However, there are additional challenges associated with the use of LH2. Relative to LNH3, 1.6 to 1.7 times the number of LH2 ships are required to deliver the same energy. Even when reliquefaction is employed, their success is reliant on the avoidance of rough sea states (i.e., Beaufort Numbers >= 6) where fuel depletion rates during a voyage are impractical.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X23000187Low-carbon shippinghydrogenammoniaenergy vectorslow-carbon cargo transportdecarbonisation
spellingShingle Jessie R. Smith
Epaminondas Mastorakos
A Systems-Level Study of Ammonia and Hydrogen for Maritime Transport
Maritime Transport Research
Low-carbon shipping
hydrogen
ammonia
energy vectors
low-carbon cargo transport
decarbonisation
title A Systems-Level Study of Ammonia and Hydrogen for Maritime Transport
title_full A Systems-Level Study of Ammonia and Hydrogen for Maritime Transport
title_fullStr A Systems-Level Study of Ammonia and Hydrogen for Maritime Transport
title_full_unstemmed A Systems-Level Study of Ammonia and Hydrogen for Maritime Transport
title_short A Systems-Level Study of Ammonia and Hydrogen for Maritime Transport
title_sort systems level study of ammonia and hydrogen for maritime transport
topic Low-carbon shipping
hydrogen
ammonia
energy vectors
low-carbon cargo transport
decarbonisation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X23000187
work_keys_str_mv AT jessiersmith asystemslevelstudyofammoniaandhydrogenformaritimetransport
AT epaminondasmastorakos asystemslevelstudyofammoniaandhydrogenformaritimetransport
AT jessiersmith systemslevelstudyofammoniaandhydrogenformaritimetransport
AT epaminondasmastorakos systemslevelstudyofammoniaandhydrogenformaritimetransport