Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete incorporating alternative materials: a case study

<p>Many studies have described the successful incorporation of wastes and industrial byproducts, here called alternative materials (AMs), into self-compacting-concrete (SCC) mixtures from a technical point of view. Such studies usually considered a universal truth that incorporating these mate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Felipe Zanellato Coelho, Robson Zulcão, João Luiz Calmon, Darli Rodrigues Vieira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba 2020-03-01
Series:Revista Principia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ifpb.edu.br/index.php/principia/article/view/3393
_version_ 1811193536793542656
author Felipe Zanellato Coelho
Robson Zulcão
João Luiz Calmon
Darli Rodrigues Vieira
author_facet Felipe Zanellato Coelho
Robson Zulcão
João Luiz Calmon
Darli Rodrigues Vieira
author_sort Felipe Zanellato Coelho
collection DOAJ
description <p>Many studies have described the successful incorporation of wastes and industrial byproducts, here called alternative materials (AMs), into self-compacting-concrete (SCC) mixtures from a technical point of view. Such studies usually considered a universal truth that incorporating these materials into the concrete matrix helps improve their eco-efficiency. Therefore, the objective of this study is to associate SCC production that incorporates AM with the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to compare mixtures in a specific United States scenario. SimaPro software, the IMPACT 2002+ impact assessment method, the Ecoinvent database and a 1 m3 functional unit with the cradle-to-gate system boundary were used. An analysis of total impact, global warming, impact intensity and most impactful processes was performed. According to the criteria analyzed, the mixtures with the best environmental gains are characterized by the partial or total replacement of cement by AMs classified as supplementary cementing materials (SCMs). Other cases did not yield significant environmental gains, such as the use of concrete and glass waste as aggregates, serving only as an alternative to their final disposal. In addition, when there was excessive energy consumption for waste recycling, such as for rubber and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling, the environmental efficiency of the SCC deteriorated.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:10:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3866a410e9134e8ba3730699e472b36c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1517-0306
2447-9187
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:10:17Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba
record_format Article
series Revista Principia
spelling doaj.art-3866a410e9134e8ba3730699e472b36c2022-12-22T03:55:58ZengInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da ParaíbaRevista Principia1517-03062447-91872020-03-01148708410.18265/1517-03062015v1n48p70-841046Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete incorporating alternative materials: a case studyFelipe Zanellato Coelho0Robson Zulcão1João Luiz Calmon2Darli Rodrigues Vieira3Universidade Federal do Espírito SantoUniversidade Federal do Espírito SantoUniversidade Federal do Espírito SantoUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières<p>Many studies have described the successful incorporation of wastes and industrial byproducts, here called alternative materials (AMs), into self-compacting-concrete (SCC) mixtures from a technical point of view. Such studies usually considered a universal truth that incorporating these materials into the concrete matrix helps improve their eco-efficiency. Therefore, the objective of this study is to associate SCC production that incorporates AM with the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology to compare mixtures in a specific United States scenario. SimaPro software, the IMPACT 2002+ impact assessment method, the Ecoinvent database and a 1 m3 functional unit with the cradle-to-gate system boundary were used. An analysis of total impact, global warming, impact intensity and most impactful processes was performed. According to the criteria analyzed, the mixtures with the best environmental gains are characterized by the partial or total replacement of cement by AMs classified as supplementary cementing materials (SCMs). Other cases did not yield significant environmental gains, such as the use of concrete and glass waste as aggregates, serving only as an alternative to their final disposal. In addition, when there was excessive energy consumption for waste recycling, such as for rubber and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling, the environmental efficiency of the SCC deteriorated.</p>https://periodicos.ifpb.edu.br/index.php/principia/article/view/3393self-compacting-concrete (scc)life cycle assessment (lca)wastesalternative materials (am)environmental impact
spellingShingle Felipe Zanellato Coelho
Robson Zulcão
João Luiz Calmon
Darli Rodrigues Vieira
Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete incorporating alternative materials: a case study
Revista Principia
self-compacting-concrete (scc)
life cycle assessment (lca)
wastes
alternative materials (am)
environmental impact
title Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete incorporating alternative materials: a case study
title_full Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete incorporating alternative materials: a case study
title_fullStr Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete incorporating alternative materials: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete incorporating alternative materials: a case study
title_short Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of self-compacting concrete incorporating alternative materials: a case study
title_sort cradle to gate life cycle assessment of self compacting concrete incorporating alternative materials a case study
topic self-compacting-concrete (scc)
life cycle assessment (lca)
wastes
alternative materials (am)
environmental impact
url https://periodicos.ifpb.edu.br/index.php/principia/article/view/3393
work_keys_str_mv AT felipezanellatocoelho cradletogatelifecycleassessmentofselfcompactingconcreteincorporatingalternativematerialsacasestudy
AT robsonzulcao cradletogatelifecycleassessmentofselfcompactingconcreteincorporatingalternativematerialsacasestudy
AT joaoluizcalmon cradletogatelifecycleassessmentofselfcompactingconcreteincorporatingalternativematerialsacasestudy
AT darlirodriguesvieira cradletogatelifecycleassessmentofselfcompactingconcreteincorporatingalternativematerialsacasestudy