Is Grand Multiparity Still An Obstetrics Risk?

Background: Grand multiparity has been known to be an obstetric risk because of the documented complications associated with the condition, and it is an indication for booking in a tertiary health institution. Patients and Methods: Cross – sectional study was conducted in Al-Batool teaching hosp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Abdullah Abbass, Sawsan Talib Salman, Majid Khalil Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: College of medicine/ University of Diyala 2019-07-01
Series:Diyala Journal of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://djm.uodiyala.edu.iq/index.php/djm/article/view/315
_version_ 1797454753838399488
author Ali Abdullah Abbass
Sawsan Talib Salman
Majid Khalil Ali
author_facet Ali Abdullah Abbass
Sawsan Talib Salman
Majid Khalil Ali
author_sort Ali Abdullah Abbass
collection DOAJ
description Background: Grand multiparity has been known to be an obstetric risk because of the documented complications associated with the condition, and it is an indication for booking in a tertiary health institution. Patients and Methods: Cross – sectional study was conducted in Al-Batool teaching hospital during the period from July 2014 to November 2014. Total number of deliveries was 200. Samples (100 grand multipara women and 100 woman as control group), who were admitted to the maternity unit for labour and delivery, the two groups were matched for age, antepartum outcome, intrapartum outcome, postpartum outcome and fetal outcome to compare the risk between grand multiparity and control. Results: Two hundred of grand multiparous woman and control group were included in the present study the mean age was (32.32 ± 6.006) years. There was (56%) of grand multiaparity have anemia and other medical diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy and urinary tract infection. Statistically significant differences noticed when compared with the control group (p- value ≤ 0.05). Also there were higher incidence of preterm labour and abruption placenta in grand multiparity comparing to control group. However higher incidence of caesarian section delivery in grand multiparous woman than control group (60%, 40%) respectively. The most common cause for caesarian section was due to previous scar, which was (58.8%) in control versus (51.6%) in grand multiparity. Regarding the perinatal outcome there was Apgar score ≤ 7 at 1 minute (61%, 28%) in grand multiparity and control respectively which was statistically significant. Conclusion: The grand multiparity still be considered a high risk in pregnancy due to medical and obstetrical complications, also it is necessary to provide a good health care for grand multiparous woman, and their neonates.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:41:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-388b56eff3cb4b12a0d9fc9cda89cf11
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2219-9764
2617-8982
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:41:39Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher College of medicine/ University of Diyala
record_format Article
series Diyala Journal of Medicine
spelling doaj.art-388b56eff3cb4b12a0d9fc9cda89cf112023-11-24T23:23:59ZengCollege of medicine/ University of DiyalaDiyala Journal of Medicine2219-97642617-89822019-07-0181Is Grand Multiparity Still An Obstetrics Risk?Ali Abdullah AbbassSawsan Talib SalmanMajid Khalil Ali Background: Grand multiparity has been known to be an obstetric risk because of the documented complications associated with the condition, and it is an indication for booking in a tertiary health institution. Patients and Methods: Cross – sectional study was conducted in Al-Batool teaching hospital during the period from July 2014 to November 2014. Total number of deliveries was 200. Samples (100 grand multipara women and 100 woman as control group), who were admitted to the maternity unit for labour and delivery, the two groups were matched for age, antepartum outcome, intrapartum outcome, postpartum outcome and fetal outcome to compare the risk between grand multiparity and control. Results: Two hundred of grand multiparous woman and control group were included in the present study the mean age was (32.32 ± 6.006) years. There was (56%) of grand multiaparity have anemia and other medical diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy and urinary tract infection. Statistically significant differences noticed when compared with the control group (p- value ≤ 0.05). Also there were higher incidence of preterm labour and abruption placenta in grand multiparity comparing to control group. However higher incidence of caesarian section delivery in grand multiparous woman than control group (60%, 40%) respectively. The most common cause for caesarian section was due to previous scar, which was (58.8%) in control versus (51.6%) in grand multiparity. Regarding the perinatal outcome there was Apgar score ≤ 7 at 1 minute (61%, 28%) in grand multiparity and control respectively which was statistically significant. Conclusion: The grand multiparity still be considered a high risk in pregnancy due to medical and obstetrical complications, also it is necessary to provide a good health care for grand multiparous woman, and their neonates. http://djm.uodiyala.edu.iq/index.php/djm/article/view/315Grand multiparity, anaemia, abruption placenta, caesarian section
spellingShingle Ali Abdullah Abbass
Sawsan Talib Salman
Majid Khalil Ali
Is Grand Multiparity Still An Obstetrics Risk?
Diyala Journal of Medicine
Grand multiparity, anaemia, abruption placenta, caesarian section
title Is Grand Multiparity Still An Obstetrics Risk?
title_full Is Grand Multiparity Still An Obstetrics Risk?
title_fullStr Is Grand Multiparity Still An Obstetrics Risk?
title_full_unstemmed Is Grand Multiparity Still An Obstetrics Risk?
title_short Is Grand Multiparity Still An Obstetrics Risk?
title_sort is grand multiparity still an obstetrics risk
topic Grand multiparity, anaemia, abruption placenta, caesarian section
url http://djm.uodiyala.edu.iq/index.php/djm/article/view/315
work_keys_str_mv AT aliabdullahabbass isgrandmultiparitystillanobstetricsrisk
AT sawsantalibsalman isgrandmultiparitystillanobstetricsrisk
AT majidkhalilali isgrandmultiparitystillanobstetricsrisk