Comparative evaluation of a novel herbal anesthetic gel and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children: Bilateral split-mouth, single-blind, crossover in vivo study
Background: Topical anesthetics have an intrinsic part to reduce pricking pain sensation due to needle stick before injection in children. Aim: The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a novel herbal anesthetic gel used as a topical anesthetic before an inferior alveolar nerve block...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2020;volume=38;issue=2;spage=177;epage=183;aulast=Mohite |
_version_ | 1819002590008967168 |
---|---|
author | Vedangi Arvind Mohite Sudhindra Baliga Nilima Thosar Nilesh Rathi Pramod Khobragade Rashi Srivastava |
author_facet | Vedangi Arvind Mohite Sudhindra Baliga Nilima Thosar Nilesh Rathi Pramod Khobragade Rashi Srivastava |
author_sort | Vedangi Arvind Mohite |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Topical anesthetics have an intrinsic part to reduce pricking pain sensation due to needle stick before injection in children. Aim: The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a novel herbal anesthetic gel used as a topical anesthetic before an inferior alveolar nerve block. SettingsandDesign: This was a bilateral split-mouth, single blind, crossoverin vivo study. Methods: Atotal number of 30 children were selected for this study design. After the application of the topical anesthesia, a 26-gauge needle was inserted in the mucobuccal fold and local anesthetic solution was deposited. Assessment of pain perception was done before the procedure and at the time of needle penetration using hemodynamic parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate. The objective and subjective pain assessment was recoded through sound eye motor scale and Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). StatisticalAnalysis: As the data followed a normal distribution, parametric tests were used to analyze these data. The independent sample t-test and paired sample t-test were used to check the mean differences. Results: The data showed no statistically significant differences in the objective and subjective pain assessment values of the novel herbal anesthetic gel compared to the 2% lignocaine gel. However, the intragroup comparisons of the before and during treatment results showed statistically significant results (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The novel herbal anesthetic gel was effective and safe in reducing the pain from needle insertion. Thus, setting up scientific evidence for the therapeutic usage of herbal products can, therefore, assist to develop a more efficient and alternative topical anesthetic. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T23:07:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-388c021e1723433caddc516e3893e508 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0970-4388 1998-3905 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T23:07:31Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
spelling | doaj.art-388c021e1723433caddc516e3893e5082022-12-21T19:23:49ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052020-01-0138217718310.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_226_20Comparative evaluation of a novel herbal anesthetic gel and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children: Bilateral split-mouth, single-blind, crossover in vivo studyVedangi Arvind MohiteSudhindra BaligaNilima ThosarNilesh RathiPramod KhobragadeRashi SrivastavaBackground: Topical anesthetics have an intrinsic part to reduce pricking pain sensation due to needle stick before injection in children. Aim: The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a novel herbal anesthetic gel used as a topical anesthetic before an inferior alveolar nerve block. SettingsandDesign: This was a bilateral split-mouth, single blind, crossoverin vivo study. Methods: Atotal number of 30 children were selected for this study design. After the application of the topical anesthesia, a 26-gauge needle was inserted in the mucobuccal fold and local anesthetic solution was deposited. Assessment of pain perception was done before the procedure and at the time of needle penetration using hemodynamic parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate. The objective and subjective pain assessment was recoded through sound eye motor scale and Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). StatisticalAnalysis: As the data followed a normal distribution, parametric tests were used to analyze these data. The independent sample t-test and paired sample t-test were used to check the mean differences. Results: The data showed no statistically significant differences in the objective and subjective pain assessment values of the novel herbal anesthetic gel compared to the 2% lignocaine gel. However, the intragroup comparisons of the before and during treatment results showed statistically significant results (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The novel herbal anesthetic gel was effective and safe in reducing the pain from needle insertion. Thus, setting up scientific evidence for the therapeutic usage of herbal products can, therefore, assist to develop a more efficient and alternative topical anesthetic.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2020;volume=38;issue=2;spage=177;epage=183;aulast=Mohite2% lignocaine gelfaces pain scale-revised scalesound eye motor scaletopical anesthetic gel |
spellingShingle | Vedangi Arvind Mohite Sudhindra Baliga Nilima Thosar Nilesh Rathi Pramod Khobragade Rashi Srivastava Comparative evaluation of a novel herbal anesthetic gel and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children: Bilateral split-mouth, single-blind, crossover in vivo study Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 2% lignocaine gel faces pain scale-revised scale sound eye motor scale topical anesthetic gel |
title | Comparative evaluation of a novel herbal anesthetic gel and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children: Bilateral split-mouth, single-blind, crossover in vivo study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of a novel herbal anesthetic gel and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children: Bilateral split-mouth, single-blind, crossover in vivo study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of a novel herbal anesthetic gel and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children: Bilateral split-mouth, single-blind, crossover in vivo study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of a novel herbal anesthetic gel and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children: Bilateral split-mouth, single-blind, crossover in vivo study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of a novel herbal anesthetic gel and 2% lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children: Bilateral split-mouth, single-blind, crossover in vivo study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of a novel herbal anesthetic gel and 2 lignocaine gel as an intraoral topical anesthetic agent in children bilateral split mouth single blind crossover in vivo study |
topic | 2% lignocaine gel faces pain scale-revised scale sound eye motor scale topical anesthetic gel |
url | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2020;volume=38;issue=2;spage=177;epage=183;aulast=Mohite |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vedangiarvindmohite comparativeevaluationofanovelherbalanestheticgeland2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildrenbilateralsplitmouthsingleblindcrossoverinvivostudy AT sudhindrabaliga comparativeevaluationofanovelherbalanestheticgeland2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildrenbilateralsplitmouthsingleblindcrossoverinvivostudy AT nilimathosar comparativeevaluationofanovelherbalanestheticgeland2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildrenbilateralsplitmouthsingleblindcrossoverinvivostudy AT nileshrathi comparativeevaluationofanovelherbalanestheticgeland2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildrenbilateralsplitmouthsingleblindcrossoverinvivostudy AT pramodkhobragade comparativeevaluationofanovelherbalanestheticgeland2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildrenbilateralsplitmouthsingleblindcrossoverinvivostudy AT rashisrivastava comparativeevaluationofanovelherbalanestheticgeland2lignocainegelasanintraoraltopicalanestheticagentinchildrenbilateralsplitmouthsingleblindcrossoverinvivostudy |