A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer

Abstract Background Mini-invasive colorectal cancer surgery was adopted widely in recent years. This meta-analysis aimed to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with open right hemicolectomy (OS) for malignant disease. Methods PRISMA guidelines with random effects model were adopted usi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Mohamed Wejih Dougaz, Meriem Mesbehi, Hichem Jerraya, Ramzi Nouira, Jim S. Khan, Chadli Dziri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-020-01869-w
_version_ 1818316140661702656
author Mohamed Ali Chaouch
Mohamed Wejih Dougaz
Meriem Mesbehi
Hichem Jerraya
Ramzi Nouira
Jim S. Khan
Chadli Dziri
author_facet Mohamed Ali Chaouch
Mohamed Wejih Dougaz
Meriem Mesbehi
Hichem Jerraya
Ramzi Nouira
Jim S. Khan
Chadli Dziri
author_sort Mohamed Ali Chaouch
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Mini-invasive colorectal cancer surgery was adopted widely in recent years. This meta-analysis aimed to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with open right hemicolectomy (OS) for malignant disease. Methods PRISMA guidelines with random effects model were adopted using Review Manager Version 5.3 for pooled estimates. Results Seven studies that involved 506 patients were included. Compared to OS, HALS improved results in terms of blood loss (MD = 53.67, 95% CI 10.67 to 96.67, p = 0.01), time to first flatus (MD = 21.11, 95% CI 14.99 to 27.23, p < 0.00001), postoperative pain score, and overall hospital stay (MD = 3.47, 95% CI 2.12 to 4.82, p < 0.00001). There was no difference as concerns post-operative mortality, morbidity (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.7, p = 0.12), wound infection (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.76, p = 0.32), operative time (MD = − 16.10, 95% CI [− 36.57 to 4.36], p = 0.12), harvested lymph nodes (MD = 0.59, 95% CI − 0.18 to 1.36, p = 0.13), and recurrence (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.15, p = 0.96). Conclusions HALS is an efficient alternative to OS in right colectomy which combines the advantages of OS with the mini-invasive surgery.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T09:16:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3893a9de254543b18758bc72801dd7a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T09:16:42Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-3893a9de254543b18758bc72801dd7a62022-12-21T23:52:49ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192020-05-011811910.1186/s12957-020-01869-wA meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancerMohamed Ali Chaouch0Mohamed Wejih Dougaz1Meriem Mesbehi2Hichem Jerraya3Ramzi Nouira4Jim S. Khan5Chadli Dziri6Department B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University Tunis El ManarDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University Tunis El ManarDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University Tunis El ManarDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University Tunis El ManarDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University Tunis El ManarDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra HospitalDepartment B of Surgery, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University Tunis El ManarAbstract Background Mini-invasive colorectal cancer surgery was adopted widely in recent years. This meta-analysis aimed to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with open right hemicolectomy (OS) for malignant disease. Methods PRISMA guidelines with random effects model were adopted using Review Manager Version 5.3 for pooled estimates. Results Seven studies that involved 506 patients were included. Compared to OS, HALS improved results in terms of blood loss (MD = 53.67, 95% CI 10.67 to 96.67, p = 0.01), time to first flatus (MD = 21.11, 95% CI 14.99 to 27.23, p < 0.00001), postoperative pain score, and overall hospital stay (MD = 3.47, 95% CI 2.12 to 4.82, p < 0.00001). There was no difference as concerns post-operative mortality, morbidity (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.7, p = 0.12), wound infection (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.76, p = 0.32), operative time (MD = − 16.10, 95% CI [− 36.57 to 4.36], p = 0.12), harvested lymph nodes (MD = 0.59, 95% CI − 0.18 to 1.36, p = 0.13), and recurrence (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.15, p = 0.96). Conclusions HALS is an efficient alternative to OS in right colectomy which combines the advantages of OS with the mini-invasive surgery.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-020-01869-wRight colonic cancerRight hemicolectomyHand-assisted laparoscopyHALSOpen surgeryColectomy
spellingShingle Mohamed Ali Chaouch
Mohamed Wejih Dougaz
Meriem Mesbehi
Hichem Jerraya
Ramzi Nouira
Jim S. Khan
Chadli Dziri
A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Right colonic cancer
Right hemicolectomy
Hand-assisted laparoscopy
HALS
Open surgery
Colectomy
title A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer
title_full A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer
title_fullStr A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer
title_short A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer
title_sort meta analysis comparing hand assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right sided colon cancer
topic Right colonic cancer
Right hemicolectomy
Hand-assisted laparoscopy
HALS
Open surgery
Colectomy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-020-01869-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedalichaouch ametaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT mohamedwejihdougaz ametaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT meriemmesbehi ametaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT hichemjerraya ametaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT ramzinouira ametaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT jimskhan ametaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT chadlidziri ametaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT mohamedalichaouch metaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT mohamedwejihdougaz metaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT meriemmesbehi metaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT hichemjerraya metaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT ramzinouira metaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT jimskhan metaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer
AT chadlidziri metaanalysiscomparinghandassistedlaparoscopicrighthemicolectomyandopenrighthemicolectomyforrightsidedcoloncancer