Technical assistance in the field of risk communication

Abstract This report assesses peer‐reviewed and grey literature on risk communication concepts and practices, as requested by the European Commission to support the implementation of a ‘General Plan for Risk Communication’, i.e. an integrated framework for EU food safety risk assessors and risk mana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Laura Maxim, Mario Mazzocchi, Stephan Van den Broucke, Fabiana Zollo, Tobin Robinson, Claire Rogers, Domagoj Vrbos, Giorgia Zamariola, Anthony Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-04-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574
_version_ 1819092577234714624
author European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Laura Maxim
Mario Mazzocchi
Stephan Van den Broucke
Fabiana Zollo
Tobin Robinson
Claire Rogers
Domagoj Vrbos
Giorgia Zamariola
Anthony Smith
author_facet European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Laura Maxim
Mario Mazzocchi
Stephan Van den Broucke
Fabiana Zollo
Tobin Robinson
Claire Rogers
Domagoj Vrbos
Giorgia Zamariola
Anthony Smith
author_sort European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This report assesses peer‐reviewed and grey literature on risk communication concepts and practices, as requested by the European Commission to support the implementation of a ‘General Plan for Risk Communication’, i.e. an integrated framework for EU food safety risk assessors and risk managers at Union and national level, as required by the revised EU General Food Law Regulation. We conducted a scoping review of social research studies and official reports in relation to risk communication in the following areas: understanding and awareness of risk analysis roles and tasks, reducing misunderstanding of the different meaning of the terms ‘hazard’ and ‘risk’, tackling misinformation and disinformation, enhancing confidence in EU food safety, taking account of risk perceptions, key factors in trade‐offs about risks, audience segmentation and tools, channels and mechanisms for coordinated risk communications. We structured our findings as follows: i) definitions of key concepts, ii) audience analysis and information requirements, iii) risk profiling, models and mechanisms, iv) contributions to communication strategies. We make several recommendations for consideration by the Commission, both in terms of actions to support the design and implementation of the general plan, and research needs that we consider crucial to further inform appropriate risk communication in the EU. EFSA carried out a targeted consultation of experts and a public consultation open to all interested parties including the general public, in preparing and finalising this report.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:57:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3899508da1c64332bb56d9e2f52969ed
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1831-4732
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:57:50Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj.art-3899508da1c64332bb56d9e2f52969ed2022-12-21T18:47:24ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322021-04-01194n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574Technical assistance in the field of risk communicationEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Laura MaximMario MazzocchiStephan Van den BrouckeFabiana ZolloTobin RobinsonClaire RogersDomagoj VrbosGiorgia ZamariolaAnthony SmithAbstract This report assesses peer‐reviewed and grey literature on risk communication concepts and practices, as requested by the European Commission to support the implementation of a ‘General Plan for Risk Communication’, i.e. an integrated framework for EU food safety risk assessors and risk managers at Union and national level, as required by the revised EU General Food Law Regulation. We conducted a scoping review of social research studies and official reports in relation to risk communication in the following areas: understanding and awareness of risk analysis roles and tasks, reducing misunderstanding of the different meaning of the terms ‘hazard’ and ‘risk’, tackling misinformation and disinformation, enhancing confidence in EU food safety, taking account of risk perceptions, key factors in trade‐offs about risks, audience segmentation and tools, channels and mechanisms for coordinated risk communications. We structured our findings as follows: i) definitions of key concepts, ii) audience analysis and information requirements, iii) risk profiling, models and mechanisms, iv) contributions to communication strategies. We make several recommendations for consideration by the Commission, both in terms of actions to support the design and implementation of the general plan, and research needs that we consider crucial to further inform appropriate risk communication in the EU. EFSA carried out a targeted consultation of experts and a public consultation open to all interested parties including the general public, in preparing and finalising this report.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574risk communicationrisk perceptionstrustaudience analysisrisk profilingmisinformation
spellingShingle European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Laura Maxim
Mario Mazzocchi
Stephan Van den Broucke
Fabiana Zollo
Tobin Robinson
Claire Rogers
Domagoj Vrbos
Giorgia Zamariola
Anthony Smith
Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
EFSA Journal
risk communication
risk perceptions
trust
audience analysis
risk profiling
misinformation
title Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title_full Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title_fullStr Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title_full_unstemmed Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title_short Technical assistance in the field of risk communication
title_sort technical assistance in the field of risk communication
topic risk communication
risk perceptions
trust
audience analysis
risk profiling
misinformation
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574
work_keys_str_mv AT europeanfoodsafetyauthorityefsa technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT lauramaxim technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT mariomazzocchi technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT stephanvandenbroucke technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT fabianazollo technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT tobinrobinson technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT clairerogers technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT domagojvrbos technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT giorgiazamariola technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication
AT anthonysmith technicalassistanceinthefieldofriskcommunication