Prospective Comparison of Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis 4 Years After Surgery

Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare physical and mental function, ankle-specific function, pain intensity, and rates of revision surgery and minor complications between ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in a prospective cohort study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruce J. Satngeorzan MD, Daniel Norvell PhD, William R. Ledoux PhD, J. Chris Coetzee MD, James S. Davitt MD, Jane Shofer MS, John G. Anderson MD, Donald R. Bohay MD, FACS, Michael J. Houghton MD, John D. Maskill MD, Michael E. Brage MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-10-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00081
_version_ 1818452615908818944
author Bruce J. Satngeorzan MD
Daniel Norvell PhD
William R. Ledoux PhD
J. Chris Coetzee MD
James S. Davitt MD
Jane Shofer MS
John G. Anderson MD
Donald R. Bohay MD, FACS
Michael J. Houghton MD
John D. Maskill MD
Michael E. Brage MD
author_facet Bruce J. Satngeorzan MD
Daniel Norvell PhD
William R. Ledoux PhD
J. Chris Coetzee MD
James S. Davitt MD
Jane Shofer MS
John G. Anderson MD
Donald R. Bohay MD, FACS
Michael J. Houghton MD
John D. Maskill MD
Michael E. Brage MD
author_sort Bruce J. Satngeorzan MD
collection DOAJ
description Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare physical and mental function, ankle-specific function, pain intensity, and rates of revision surgery and minor complications between ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in a prospective cohort study with minimum 4 year follow up after surgery. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled subjects from May 2012 to May 2015 included 517 subjects from 6 centers. Inclusion criteria ensured patients were suitable for both treatments while exclusion criteria were those with disabilities or diseases other than OA that effected ambulatory function including metabolic, neurologic, or musculoskeletal diseases such as hip or knee OA Outcomes were measured pre-treatment and 4-7 years after surgery. Linear mixed effects regression was used to determine if there were differences in postoperative improvement in each continuous outcome by surgical procedure. The primary outcomes included the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and the FAAM sport, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) scores, the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG) including average pain, worst pain and pain interference. Data were collected by study coordinators who were not involved in the surgery. Results: Of the 517 patients (414 receiving TAA, 103 receiving AA) with baseline assessment, 400 (325 TAA and 75 AA) were followed to 4 years. Pre-treatment, the two groups were not significantly different by sex, race, marital status, education, severity of OA. Data were adjusted, BMI, age. Patients demonstrated mean improvement in the FAAM and CPG outcomes at 1 year and maintained improvement out to 4 years (p<.001) regardless of surgery. TAA patients had significantly greater improvement in FAAM ADL score at all post-op visits compared to AA patients, with improvement at 4 year post-op 10 points greater (95% confidence interval 4, 17, p<.001). Similar differences in improvement occurred for the FAAM Sports and worst pain outcomes, although these differences were not statistically significant at all follow-ups. Conclusion: At 4 years post treatment, patients who were treated by ankle arthrodesis and ankle arthroplasty had sustained significant improvement. Patients treated with ankle replacement had greater improvement in FAAM and pain compared to those treated with arthrodesis. There was no difference in adverse events in the two groups
first_indexed 2024-12-14T21:25:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-38a30350193542f9be6b395c6e2c9099
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T21:25:55Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-38a30350193542f9be6b395c6e2c90992022-12-21T22:46:48ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142020-10-01510.1177/2473011420S00081Prospective Comparison of Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis 4 Years After SurgeryBruce J. Satngeorzan MDDaniel Norvell PhDWilliam R. Ledoux PhDJ. Chris Coetzee MDJames S. Davitt MDJane Shofer MSJohn G. Anderson MDDonald R. Bohay MD, FACSMichael J. Houghton MDJohn D. Maskill MDMichael E. Brage MDCategory: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare physical and mental function, ankle-specific function, pain intensity, and rates of revision surgery and minor complications between ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in a prospective cohort study with minimum 4 year follow up after surgery. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled subjects from May 2012 to May 2015 included 517 subjects from 6 centers. Inclusion criteria ensured patients were suitable for both treatments while exclusion criteria were those with disabilities or diseases other than OA that effected ambulatory function including metabolic, neurologic, or musculoskeletal diseases such as hip or knee OA Outcomes were measured pre-treatment and 4-7 years after surgery. Linear mixed effects regression was used to determine if there were differences in postoperative improvement in each continuous outcome by surgical procedure. The primary outcomes included the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and the FAAM sport, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) scores, the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG) including average pain, worst pain and pain interference. Data were collected by study coordinators who were not involved in the surgery. Results: Of the 517 patients (414 receiving TAA, 103 receiving AA) with baseline assessment, 400 (325 TAA and 75 AA) were followed to 4 years. Pre-treatment, the two groups were not significantly different by sex, race, marital status, education, severity of OA. Data were adjusted, BMI, age. Patients demonstrated mean improvement in the FAAM and CPG outcomes at 1 year and maintained improvement out to 4 years (p<.001) regardless of surgery. TAA patients had significantly greater improvement in FAAM ADL score at all post-op visits compared to AA patients, with improvement at 4 year post-op 10 points greater (95% confidence interval 4, 17, p<.001). Similar differences in improvement occurred for the FAAM Sports and worst pain outcomes, although these differences were not statistically significant at all follow-ups. Conclusion: At 4 years post treatment, patients who were treated by ankle arthrodesis and ankle arthroplasty had sustained significant improvement. Patients treated with ankle replacement had greater improvement in FAAM and pain compared to those treated with arthrodesis. There was no difference in adverse events in the two groupshttps://doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00081
spellingShingle Bruce J. Satngeorzan MD
Daniel Norvell PhD
William R. Ledoux PhD
J. Chris Coetzee MD
James S. Davitt MD
Jane Shofer MS
John G. Anderson MD
Donald R. Bohay MD, FACS
Michael J. Houghton MD
John D. Maskill MD
Michael E. Brage MD
Prospective Comparison of Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis 4 Years After Surgery
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title Prospective Comparison of Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis 4 Years After Surgery
title_full Prospective Comparison of Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis 4 Years After Surgery
title_fullStr Prospective Comparison of Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis 4 Years After Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Comparison of Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis 4 Years After Surgery
title_short Prospective Comparison of Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis 4 Years After Surgery
title_sort prospective comparison of ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis 4 years after surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00081
work_keys_str_mv AT brucejsatngeorzanmd prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery
AT danielnorvellphd prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery
AT williamrledouxphd prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery
AT jchriscoetzeemd prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery
AT jamessdavittmd prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery
AT janeshoferms prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery
AT johngandersonmd prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery
AT donaldrbohaymdfacs prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery
AT michaeljhoughtonmd prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery
AT johndmaskillmd prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery
AT michaelebragemd prospectivecomparisonofanklereplacementandanklearthrodesis4yearsaftersurgery