The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis

Abstract Oral health is a window to a patient’s general well-being. Balance in oral microbiome functions is crucial for health maintenance. A state of oral dysbiosis may lead to a variety of local and systemic pathological conditions. The presence of dental plaque is related to the majority of oral...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Dudek-Wicher, A. F. Junka, P. Migdał, A. Korzeniowska-Kowal, A. Wzorek, M. Bartoszewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-11-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02532-4
_version_ 1811219345743806464
author R. Dudek-Wicher
A. F. Junka
P. Migdał
A. Korzeniowska-Kowal
A. Wzorek
M. Bartoszewicz
author_facet R. Dudek-Wicher
A. F. Junka
P. Migdał
A. Korzeniowska-Kowal
A. Wzorek
M. Bartoszewicz
author_sort R. Dudek-Wicher
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Oral health is a window to a patient’s general well-being. Balance in oral microbiome functions is crucial for health maintenance. A state of oral dysbiosis may lead to a variety of local and systemic pathological conditions. The presence of dental plaque is related to the majority of oral infections. Proper oral hygiene is crucial and the most economic practice contributing to oral health prophylaxis. Aside from prophylactic treatments provided by dental practitioners, mouth rinses, containing antimicrobial agents, are one of the possible tools used for oral care. Our study was to determine whether available mouth rinses and selected products dedicated for professional use are efficient to eradicate biofilm formed by reference and clinical strains of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus mitis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Candida albicans on the surface of hydroxyapatite – major mineral component of a tooth. Therefore, such antimicrobials as chlorhexidine, cetylpyridine chloride, polyhexanide, silver nanoparticles, sulphonated phenolics, and natural antiplaque essential oils and coconut oil were analyzed. Applied experimental settings in in vitro models were designed to reflect accurately the recommended use of the tested substances, therefore four types of eradication procedure were conducted. Sialorrhea simulation was also performed to evaluate antibiofilm potential of diluted mouth rinses. Biofilm was investigated with quantitative method where absorbance values were measured. Statistical differences were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with a post-hoc Dunnett’s analysis. Results have shown that biofilms displayed a diversified sensitivity to the tested antimicrobials. The highest antibiofilm activity was detected for cetylpyridine chloride while the lowest for chlorhexidine. However the differences in E. faecalis biofilm reduction observed after the use of these two compounds were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), whereas all observed differences in S. aureus survival after exposure to the examined antimicrobial agents were statistically significant (p < 0.5). The PHMB, both in standard and in sialorrhea simulated conditions had the highest potential against streptococci. The coconut oil reduced C. albicans fungus biofilm by 65.48% but low eradication level was observed in case of bacterial biofilms. The dehydrating mechanism of action of sulfonated phenolics turned out to be ineffective against streptococcal biofilm which in turn was effectively eradicated by silver nanoparticles. The implementation of Antibiofilm Dressing's Activity Measurement method allowed to observe strain-related differences in terms of antimicrobial sensitivity. The obtained results may be introduced in everyday out-patient dental plaque prophylaxis as well as clinical environment.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:25:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-38a5757d0abe4651a8a0f62dde771312
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6831
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:25:49Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Oral Health
spelling doaj.art-38a5757d0abe4651a8a0f62dde7713122022-12-22T03:42:12ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312022-11-0122111410.1186/s12903-022-02532-4The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxisR. Dudek-Wicher0A. F. Junka1P. Migdał2A. Korzeniowska-Kowal3A. Wzorek4M. Bartoszewicz5Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Silesian Piasts in WroclawDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Silesian Piasts in WroclawDepartment of Environment, Hygiene and Animal Welfare, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life SciencesDepartment of Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Polish Collection of Microorganisms (PCM), Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of SciencesDepartment of Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Polish Collection of Microorganisms (PCM), Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of SciencesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Silesian Piasts in WroclawAbstract Oral health is a window to a patient’s general well-being. Balance in oral microbiome functions is crucial for health maintenance. A state of oral dysbiosis may lead to a variety of local and systemic pathological conditions. The presence of dental plaque is related to the majority of oral infections. Proper oral hygiene is crucial and the most economic practice contributing to oral health prophylaxis. Aside from prophylactic treatments provided by dental practitioners, mouth rinses, containing antimicrobial agents, are one of the possible tools used for oral care. Our study was to determine whether available mouth rinses and selected products dedicated for professional use are efficient to eradicate biofilm formed by reference and clinical strains of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus mitis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Candida albicans on the surface of hydroxyapatite – major mineral component of a tooth. Therefore, such antimicrobials as chlorhexidine, cetylpyridine chloride, polyhexanide, silver nanoparticles, sulphonated phenolics, and natural antiplaque essential oils and coconut oil were analyzed. Applied experimental settings in in vitro models were designed to reflect accurately the recommended use of the tested substances, therefore four types of eradication procedure were conducted. Sialorrhea simulation was also performed to evaluate antibiofilm potential of diluted mouth rinses. Biofilm was investigated with quantitative method where absorbance values were measured. Statistical differences were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with a post-hoc Dunnett’s analysis. Results have shown that biofilms displayed a diversified sensitivity to the tested antimicrobials. The highest antibiofilm activity was detected for cetylpyridine chloride while the lowest for chlorhexidine. However the differences in E. faecalis biofilm reduction observed after the use of these two compounds were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), whereas all observed differences in S. aureus survival after exposure to the examined antimicrobial agents were statistically significant (p < 0.5). The PHMB, both in standard and in sialorrhea simulated conditions had the highest potential against streptococci. The coconut oil reduced C. albicans fungus biofilm by 65.48% but low eradication level was observed in case of bacterial biofilms. The dehydrating mechanism of action of sulfonated phenolics turned out to be ineffective against streptococcal biofilm which in turn was effectively eradicated by silver nanoparticles. The implementation of Antibiofilm Dressing's Activity Measurement method allowed to observe strain-related differences in terms of antimicrobial sensitivity. The obtained results may be introduced in everyday out-patient dental plaque prophylaxis as well as clinical environment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02532-4DysbiosisBiofilmChlorhexidineCetylpyridinium chloridePolyhexanideSilver nanoparticles
spellingShingle R. Dudek-Wicher
A. F. Junka
P. Migdał
A. Korzeniowska-Kowal
A. Wzorek
M. Bartoszewicz
The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
BMC Oral Health
Dysbiosis
Biofilm
Chlorhexidine
Cetylpyridinium chloride
Polyhexanide
Silver nanoparticles
title The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title_full The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title_fullStr The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title_short The antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
title_sort antibiofilm activity of selected substances used in oral health prophylaxis
topic Dysbiosis
Biofilm
Chlorhexidine
Cetylpyridinium chloride
Polyhexanide
Silver nanoparticles
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02532-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rdudekwicher theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT afjunka theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT pmigdał theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT akorzeniowskakowal theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT awzorek theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT mbartoszewicz theantibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT rdudekwicher antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT afjunka antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT pmigdał antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT akorzeniowskakowal antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT awzorek antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis
AT mbartoszewicz antibiofilmactivityofselectedsubstancesusedinoralhealthprophylaxis