Demon of Controversy. Author and his Work – Accord or Discord?
Post-1989, discussions of the so-called controversial author have become one of the central topics in the cultural and literary fields. These were influenced by several factors, primarily motivated by the political and social changes that took place after the fall of state socialism. The article tac...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ces |
| Published: |
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Slovak Literature
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Slovenska Literatura |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/01211203slov_lit_01-22-3.pdf |
| _version_ | 1811170668149997568 |
|---|---|
| author | Pavel Matejovič |
| author_facet | Pavel Matejovič |
| author_sort | Pavel Matejovič |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Post-1989, discussions of the so-called controversial author have become one of the central topics in the cultural and literary fields. These were influenced by several factors, primarily motivated by the political and social changes that took place after the fall of state socialism. The article tackles the issue of social determination of authorial controversy through the theories of Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu (authorial genealogy, the notion of the literary field). Chosen case studies help illustrate the way in which aesthetic and axiological criteria shifted in response to the changing ideological requirements that characterise the literary canon at the given time. At present, authorial controversy is discussed primarily in the media where it often serves as a marketing strategy. In didactical practice, the term is based on the incongruity of the empirical author with the institutionalised understanding of literature as part of humanistic traditions. This contradiction is then reflected in cultural journalism as a controversy. Literary historical research draws on archival research and period documents and in this way employs a different theoretical apparatus which in turn enables the scholar to describe period social and cultural mechanisms that generate controversy as part of the period language. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T17:01:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-38a6e98e4e044231aca762cfb4c74ca4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0037-6973 |
| language | ces |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T17:01:38Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Slovak Literature |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Slovenska Literatura |
| spelling | doaj.art-38a6e98e4e044231aca762cfb4c74ca42023-02-06T10:47:41ZcesSlovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Slovak LiteratureSlovenska Literatura0037-69732022-01-01691354310.31577/slovlit.2022.69.1.3Demon of Controversy. Author and his Work – Accord or Discord?Pavel Matejovič0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5253-4018Ústav slovenskej literatúry SAV, v.v.i.Post-1989, discussions of the so-called controversial author have become one of the central topics in the cultural and literary fields. These were influenced by several factors, primarily motivated by the political and social changes that took place after the fall of state socialism. The article tackles the issue of social determination of authorial controversy through the theories of Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu (authorial genealogy, the notion of the literary field). Chosen case studies help illustrate the way in which aesthetic and axiological criteria shifted in response to the changing ideological requirements that characterise the literary canon at the given time. At present, authorial controversy is discussed primarily in the media where it often serves as a marketing strategy. In didactical practice, the term is based on the incongruity of the empirical author with the institutionalised understanding of literature as part of humanistic traditions. This contradiction is then reflected in cultural journalism as a controversy. Literary historical research draws on archival research and period documents and in this way employs a different theoretical apparatus which in turn enables the scholar to describe period social and cultural mechanisms that generate controversy as part of the period language.https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/01211203slov_lit_01-22-3.pdfauthorcontroversyliterary fieldliterary canonperiod language |
| spellingShingle | Pavel Matejovič Demon of Controversy. Author and his Work – Accord or Discord? Slovenska Literatura author controversy literary field literary canon period language |
| title | Demon of Controversy. Author and his Work – Accord or Discord? |
| title_full | Demon of Controversy. Author and his Work – Accord or Discord? |
| title_fullStr | Demon of Controversy. Author and his Work – Accord or Discord? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Demon of Controversy. Author and his Work – Accord or Discord? |
| title_short | Demon of Controversy. Author and his Work – Accord or Discord? |
| title_sort | demon of controversy author and his work accord or discord |
| topic | author controversy literary field literary canon period language |
| url | https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/01211203slov_lit_01-22-3.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pavelmatejovic demonofcontroversyauthorandhisworkaccordordiscord |