KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN BERWICK SAYERS DAN MARY MORTIMER TENTANG SISTEM KLASIFIKASI PERPUSTAKAAN
This paper focuses on a good library classification system based on the thoughts of Berwick Sayers and Mary Mortimer. It compares and looks at the relevance of these thoughts. This study applied a qualitative approach and comparative descriptive analysis. Both Berwick Sayers and Mary Mortimer have b...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
UPT Perpustakaan Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Pustaka Ilmiah |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jurnalpustakailmiah/article/view/46421 |
| _version_ | 1818000788209795072 |
|---|---|
| author | Nurul Fadilla |
| author_facet | Nurul Fadilla |
| author_sort | Nurul Fadilla |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper focuses on a good library classification system based on the thoughts of Berwick Sayers and Mary Mortimer. It compares and looks at the relevance of these thoughts. This study applied a qualitative approach and comparative descriptive analysis. Both Berwick Sayers and Mary Mortimer have been famous for their works including the library classification system. Based on the results of a comparison between their thoughts, the study found four fundamental differences. The differences cover 1) A good form of classification is easy to use as explicitly proposed by Mary Mortimer because a ‘good version’ for the librarian is not necessarily a ‘good version’ for the library user. Thus, the result will be different. However, if it is easy to use for the user, then it is certainly a good classification form. Meanwhile, Berwick Sayers does not provide an assertive statement but only explains about a good classification; 2) Simple notation versus specific notation; 3) Fitted with a geographical table; 4) Alphabetical versus systematical. Further, the study found four similarities between those thoughts, such as 1) Cover all fields of science; 2) Accommodate new scientific subjects and notations; 3) Develop new science, and 4) Have a supervisory board. Explicitly, the idea that can be implemented in the current library is Mary Mortimer’s thought, Dewey Decimal Classification. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-14T03:26:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-38a81bf1e474475985ee1edad0d68b26 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2477-2070 2685-8363 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-14T03:26:08Z |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | UPT Perpustakaan Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Pustaka Ilmiah |
| spelling | doaj.art-38a81bf1e474475985ee1edad0d68b262022-12-22T02:15:10ZengUPT Perpustakaan Universitas Sebelas Maret SurakartaJurnal Pustaka Ilmiah2477-20702685-83632021-01-01621065107510.20961/jpi.v6i2.4642129013KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN BERWICK SAYERS DAN MARY MORTIMER TENTANG SISTEM KLASIFIKASI PERPUSTAKAANNurul Fadilla0UIN Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaThis paper focuses on a good library classification system based on the thoughts of Berwick Sayers and Mary Mortimer. It compares and looks at the relevance of these thoughts. This study applied a qualitative approach and comparative descriptive analysis. Both Berwick Sayers and Mary Mortimer have been famous for their works including the library classification system. Based on the results of a comparison between their thoughts, the study found four fundamental differences. The differences cover 1) A good form of classification is easy to use as explicitly proposed by Mary Mortimer because a ‘good version’ for the librarian is not necessarily a ‘good version’ for the library user. Thus, the result will be different. However, if it is easy to use for the user, then it is certainly a good classification form. Meanwhile, Berwick Sayers does not provide an assertive statement but only explains about a good classification; 2) Simple notation versus specific notation; 3) Fitted with a geographical table; 4) Alphabetical versus systematical. Further, the study found four similarities between those thoughts, such as 1) Cover all fields of science; 2) Accommodate new scientific subjects and notations; 3) Develop new science, and 4) Have a supervisory board. Explicitly, the idea that can be implemented in the current library is Mary Mortimer’s thought, Dewey Decimal Classification.https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jurnalpustakailmiah/article/view/46421figureclassificationlibrary classification systemcomparison of figuresberwick sayersmary mortimer |
| spellingShingle | Nurul Fadilla KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN BERWICK SAYERS DAN MARY MORTIMER TENTANG SISTEM KLASIFIKASI PERPUSTAKAAN Jurnal Pustaka Ilmiah figure classification library classification system comparison of figures berwick sayers mary mortimer |
| title | KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN BERWICK SAYERS DAN MARY MORTIMER TENTANG SISTEM KLASIFIKASI PERPUSTAKAAN |
| title_full | KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN BERWICK SAYERS DAN MARY MORTIMER TENTANG SISTEM KLASIFIKASI PERPUSTAKAAN |
| title_fullStr | KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN BERWICK SAYERS DAN MARY MORTIMER TENTANG SISTEM KLASIFIKASI PERPUSTAKAAN |
| title_full_unstemmed | KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN BERWICK SAYERS DAN MARY MORTIMER TENTANG SISTEM KLASIFIKASI PERPUSTAKAAN |
| title_short | KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN BERWICK SAYERS DAN MARY MORTIMER TENTANG SISTEM KLASIFIKASI PERPUSTAKAAN |
| title_sort | komparasi pemikiran berwick sayers dan mary mortimer tentang sistem klasifikasi perpustakaan |
| topic | figure classification library classification system comparison of figures berwick sayers mary mortimer |
| url | https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jurnalpustakailmiah/article/view/46421 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nurulfadilla komparasipemikiranberwicksayersdanmarymortimertentangsistemklasifikasiperpustakaan |