Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation

For CO2 transportation, as an intermediate link in the construction of large-scale carbon capture, utilization and storage projects, pipeline transportation is the preferred. Therefore, the economic evaluation model of CO2 pipeline transportation is the basis for evaluating its return on investment...

Descrición completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Main Authors: Jiaxing LYU, Lei HOU, Xin WANG, Yujiang WANG, Fangyuan LIU
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:zho
Publicado: Editorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation 2022-01-01
Series:You-qi chuyun
Subjects:
Acceso en liña:http://yqcy.xml-journal.net/cn/article/doi/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016
_version_ 1827284898470166528
author Jiaxing LYU
Lei HOU
Xin WANG
Yujiang WANG
Fangyuan LIU
author_facet Jiaxing LYU
Lei HOU
Xin WANG
Yujiang WANG
Fangyuan LIU
author_sort Jiaxing LYU
collection DOAJ
description For CO2 transportation, as an intermediate link in the construction of large-scale carbon capture, utilization and storage projects, pipeline transportation is the preferred. Therefore, the economic evaluation model of CO2 pipeline transportation is the basis for evaluating its return on investment and optimizing the parameters of pipeline transportation. By comparing and analyzing the calculation formula of CO2 pipeline diameter, an economic evaluation model was established and thereby, the economic evaluation of pipeline diameter was performed based on a case of supercritical CO2 pipeline engineering. The results show that the unit cost of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation decreases first and then increases with the increase of the pipeline diameter. For the pipeline with a transport capacity of 1×106 t/a and a length of 200 km, the unit transportation cost of CO2 is the lowest at the pipeline diameter of 240 mm. Since the calculation result of the Vandeginste pipeline diameter formula is close to the theoretical optimal pipeline diameter, the Vandeginste pipeline diameter formula is recommended for the calculation of the pipeline diameter in the actual projects. However, the pipeline cost saved at a nominal diameter of 200 mm is far greater than the increment of energy consumption, and thus the annual cost in this case is the minimum. In addition, the unit transportation cost decreases with the increase of transportation distance, and the unit cost trends to be stable when the distance is longer than 200 km. Therefore, the research results could provide scientific basis and reference for the decision-making concerning the economic pipeline transportation of CO2.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T10:05:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-38a9ece0dea54fc891c67d9eb9eaddc1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1000-8241
language zho
last_indexed 2024-04-24T10:05:04Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Editorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
record_format Article
series You-qi chuyun
spelling doaj.art-38a9ece0dea54fc891c67d9eb9eaddc12024-04-13T02:28:17ZzhoEditorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationYou-qi chuyun1000-82412022-01-0141111412010.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016yqcy-41-1-114Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportationJiaxing LYU0Lei HOU1Xin WANG2Yujiang WANG3Fangyuan LIU4College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing)//CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationCollege of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing)//CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationCollege of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing)//CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationEngineering Technology Management Centre, SINOPEC Shengli Oilfield BranchCollege of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing)//CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationFor CO2 transportation, as an intermediate link in the construction of large-scale carbon capture, utilization and storage projects, pipeline transportation is the preferred. Therefore, the economic evaluation model of CO2 pipeline transportation is the basis for evaluating its return on investment and optimizing the parameters of pipeline transportation. By comparing and analyzing the calculation formula of CO2 pipeline diameter, an economic evaluation model was established and thereby, the economic evaluation of pipeline diameter was performed based on a case of supercritical CO2 pipeline engineering. The results show that the unit cost of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation decreases first and then increases with the increase of the pipeline diameter. For the pipeline with a transport capacity of 1×106 t/a and a length of 200 km, the unit transportation cost of CO2 is the lowest at the pipeline diameter of 240 mm. Since the calculation result of the Vandeginste pipeline diameter formula is close to the theoretical optimal pipeline diameter, the Vandeginste pipeline diameter formula is recommended for the calculation of the pipeline diameter in the actual projects. However, the pipeline cost saved at a nominal diameter of 200 mm is far greater than the increment of energy consumption, and thus the annual cost in this case is the minimum. In addition, the unit transportation cost decreases with the increase of transportation distance, and the unit cost trends to be stable when the distance is longer than 200 km. Therefore, the research results could provide scientific basis and reference for the decision-making concerning the economic pipeline transportation of CO2.http://yqcy.xml-journal.net/cn/article/doi/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016supercritical co2pipeline transportationpipeline diameter calculationtransportation costeconomic evaluationsensitivity
spellingShingle Jiaxing LYU
Lei HOU
Xin WANG
Yujiang WANG
Fangyuan LIU
Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation
You-qi chuyun
supercritical co2
pipeline transportation
pipeline diameter calculation
transportation cost
economic evaluation
sensitivity
title Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation
title_full Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation
title_fullStr Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation
title_short Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation
title_sort economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical co2 pipeline transportation
topic supercritical co2
pipeline transportation
pipeline diameter calculation
transportation cost
economic evaluation
sensitivity
url http://yqcy.xml-journal.net/cn/article/doi/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaxinglyu economicevaluationondiameterselectionofsupercriticalco2pipelinetransportation
AT leihou economicevaluationondiameterselectionofsupercriticalco2pipelinetransportation
AT xinwang economicevaluationondiameterselectionofsupercriticalco2pipelinetransportation
AT yujiangwang economicevaluationondiameterselectionofsupercriticalco2pipelinetransportation
AT fangyuanliu economicevaluationondiameterselectionofsupercriticalco2pipelinetransportation