Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation
For CO2 transportation, as an intermediate link in the construction of large-scale carbon capture, utilization and storage projects, pipeline transportation is the preferred. Therefore, the economic evaluation model of CO2 pipeline transportation is the basis for evaluating its return on investment...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Artigo |
Idioma: | zho |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
2022-01-01
|
Series: | You-qi chuyun |
Subjects: | |
Acceso en liña: | http://yqcy.xml-journal.net/cn/article/doi/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016 |
_version_ | 1827284898470166528 |
---|---|
author | Jiaxing LYU Lei HOU Xin WANG Yujiang WANG Fangyuan LIU |
author_facet | Jiaxing LYU Lei HOU Xin WANG Yujiang WANG Fangyuan LIU |
author_sort | Jiaxing LYU |
collection | DOAJ |
description | For CO2 transportation, as an intermediate link in the construction of large-scale carbon capture, utilization and storage projects, pipeline transportation is the preferred. Therefore, the economic evaluation model of CO2 pipeline transportation is the basis for evaluating its return on investment and optimizing the parameters of pipeline transportation. By comparing and analyzing the calculation formula of CO2 pipeline diameter, an economic evaluation model was established and thereby, the economic evaluation of pipeline diameter was performed based on a case of supercritical CO2 pipeline engineering. The results show that the unit cost of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation decreases first and then increases with the increase of the pipeline diameter. For the pipeline with a transport capacity of 1×106 t/a and a length of 200 km, the unit transportation cost of CO2 is the lowest at the pipeline diameter of 240 mm. Since the calculation result of the Vandeginste pipeline diameter formula is close to the theoretical optimal pipeline diameter, the Vandeginste pipeline diameter formula is recommended for the calculation of the pipeline diameter in the actual projects. However, the pipeline cost saved at a nominal diameter of 200 mm is far greater than the increment of energy consumption, and thus the annual cost in this case is the minimum. In addition, the unit transportation cost decreases with the increase of transportation distance, and the unit cost trends to be stable when the distance is longer than 200 km. Therefore, the research results could provide scientific basis and reference for the decision-making concerning the economic pipeline transportation of CO2. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T10:05:04Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-38a9ece0dea54fc891c67d9eb9eaddc1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1000-8241 |
language | zho |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T10:05:04Z |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation |
record_format | Article |
series | You-qi chuyun |
spelling | doaj.art-38a9ece0dea54fc891c67d9eb9eaddc12024-04-13T02:28:17ZzhoEditorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationYou-qi chuyun1000-82412022-01-0141111412010.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016yqcy-41-1-114Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportationJiaxing LYU0Lei HOU1Xin WANG2Yujiang WANG3Fangyuan LIU4College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing)//CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationCollege of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing)//CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationCollege of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing)//CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationEngineering Technology Management Centre, SINOPEC Shengli Oilfield BranchCollege of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing)//CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationFor CO2 transportation, as an intermediate link in the construction of large-scale carbon capture, utilization and storage projects, pipeline transportation is the preferred. Therefore, the economic evaluation model of CO2 pipeline transportation is the basis for evaluating its return on investment and optimizing the parameters of pipeline transportation. By comparing and analyzing the calculation formula of CO2 pipeline diameter, an economic evaluation model was established and thereby, the economic evaluation of pipeline diameter was performed based on a case of supercritical CO2 pipeline engineering. The results show that the unit cost of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation decreases first and then increases with the increase of the pipeline diameter. For the pipeline with a transport capacity of 1×106 t/a and a length of 200 km, the unit transportation cost of CO2 is the lowest at the pipeline diameter of 240 mm. Since the calculation result of the Vandeginste pipeline diameter formula is close to the theoretical optimal pipeline diameter, the Vandeginste pipeline diameter formula is recommended for the calculation of the pipeline diameter in the actual projects. However, the pipeline cost saved at a nominal diameter of 200 mm is far greater than the increment of energy consumption, and thus the annual cost in this case is the minimum. In addition, the unit transportation cost decreases with the increase of transportation distance, and the unit cost trends to be stable when the distance is longer than 200 km. Therefore, the research results could provide scientific basis and reference for the decision-making concerning the economic pipeline transportation of CO2.http://yqcy.xml-journal.net/cn/article/doi/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016supercritical co2pipeline transportationpipeline diameter calculationtransportation costeconomic evaluationsensitivity |
spellingShingle | Jiaxing LYU Lei HOU Xin WANG Yujiang WANG Fangyuan LIU Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation You-qi chuyun supercritical co2 pipeline transportation pipeline diameter calculation transportation cost economic evaluation sensitivity |
title | Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation |
title_full | Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation |
title_fullStr | Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation |
title_short | Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation |
title_sort | economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical co2 pipeline transportation |
topic | supercritical co2 pipeline transportation pipeline diameter calculation transportation cost economic evaluation sensitivity |
url | http://yqcy.xml-journal.net/cn/article/doi/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiaxinglyu economicevaluationondiameterselectionofsupercriticalco2pipelinetransportation AT leihou economicevaluationondiameterselectionofsupercriticalco2pipelinetransportation AT xinwang economicevaluationondiameterselectionofsupercriticalco2pipelinetransportation AT yujiangwang economicevaluationondiameterselectionofsupercriticalco2pipelinetransportation AT fangyuanliu economicevaluationondiameterselectionofsupercriticalco2pipelinetransportation |