| Summary: | A long-duration, multi-mission altimeter dataset is analyzed to determine its accuracy in determining long-term trends in significant wave height. Two calibration methods are investigated: “altimeter–buoy” calibration and “altimeter–altimeter” calibration. The “altimeter–altimeter” approach shows larger positive trends globally, but both approaches are subject to temporal non-homogeneity between altimeter missions. This limits the accuracy of such datasets to approximately ±0.2 cm/year in determining trends in significant wave height. The sampling pattern of the altimeters is also investigated to determine if under-sampling impacts the ability of altimeters to measure trends for higher percentiles. It is concluded that, at the 99th percentile level, sampling issues result in a positive bias in values of trend. At lower percentiles (90th and mean), the sampling issues do not bias the trend estimates significantly.
|
|---|