A Systematic Analysis of Reviews Exploring the Scope, Validity, and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures of Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes
Joshua Wells, Philip Crilly, Reem Kayyali Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Kingston, UKCorrespondence: Reem Kayyali, Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston, KT1 2EE, UK, Tel/Fax +44 208 417 2561, Email r.kayyali@kingston.ac.ukIntroduction: Non-adherence to me...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2022-08-01
|
| Series: | Patient Preference and Adherence |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/a-systematic-analysis-of-reviews-exploring-the-scope-validity-and-repo-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PPA |
| _version_ | 1798041190444040192 |
|---|---|
| author | Wells J Crilly P Kayyali R |
| author_facet | Wells J Crilly P Kayyali R |
| author_sort | Wells J |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Joshua Wells, Philip Crilly, Reem Kayyali Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Kingston, UKCorrespondence: Reem Kayyali, Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston, KT1 2EE, UK, Tel/Fax +44 208 417 2561, Email r.kayyali@kingston.ac.ukIntroduction: Non-adherence to medicines is estimated to cost billions to healthcare providers across the US and Europe each year. Addressing medication adherence (MA) can be challenging. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed to collect self-reported data on MA, among other behaviours. Despite the myriad PROMs available and their widespread implementation in research, there is little commentary or standardization on the way they are reported, or their validity assessed. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of systematic reviews (SRs) that report PROMs of MA with a focus on type 2 diabetes to explore PROM reporting and validity.Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science. SRs reporting on PROMs related to MA behaviour in patients living with type 2 diabetes were included. Any SR published in English prior to December 2021 was included. Abstract and title screening were performed prior to full-text review by two independent researchers with discrepancies managed by a third. Protocols and SRs reporting on paediatric populations were excluded.Results: A total of 19 eligible SRs that included 241 unique PROM studies were captured from the initial 2074 records that were identified. Data were captured across a 30-year scope, with roughly half (47.4%, n=9/19) of the SRs published in the last 5 years. In total, 104 unique PROMs were identified. Inclusion of non-validated PROMs was identified in 63.2% (n=12/19) of the included SRs, and reporting issues were identified in 47.3% of studies (n=114/241). A lower journal impact factor was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of validity issues (r=0.44, p=0.04).Conclusion: There are a broad range of available PROMs; however, they have been reported inconsistently in the literature, often lacking significant evidence with respect to validity criteria. Standardization of reporting and assessments of validity may help to address this.Keywords: medication adherence, patient-reported outcomes measures, type 2 diabetes, validity, taxonomy |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T22:18:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-38bbc71503024baebfd676a3d659d668 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1177-889X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T22:18:02Z |
| publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
| publisher | Dove Medical Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Patient Preference and Adherence |
| spelling | doaj.art-38bbc71503024baebfd676a3d659d6682022-12-22T04:00:19ZengDove Medical PressPatient Preference and Adherence1177-889X2022-08-01Volume 161941195477090A Systematic Analysis of Reviews Exploring the Scope, Validity, and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures of Medication Adherence in Type 2 DiabetesWells JCrilly PKayyali RJoshua Wells, Philip Crilly, Reem Kayyali Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Kingston, UKCorrespondence: Reem Kayyali, Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston, KT1 2EE, UK, Tel/Fax +44 208 417 2561, Email r.kayyali@kingston.ac.ukIntroduction: Non-adherence to medicines is estimated to cost billions to healthcare providers across the US and Europe each year. Addressing medication adherence (MA) can be challenging. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed to collect self-reported data on MA, among other behaviours. Despite the myriad PROMs available and their widespread implementation in research, there is little commentary or standardization on the way they are reported, or their validity assessed. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of systematic reviews (SRs) that report PROMs of MA with a focus on type 2 diabetes to explore PROM reporting and validity.Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science. SRs reporting on PROMs related to MA behaviour in patients living with type 2 diabetes were included. Any SR published in English prior to December 2021 was included. Abstract and title screening were performed prior to full-text review by two independent researchers with discrepancies managed by a third. Protocols and SRs reporting on paediatric populations were excluded.Results: A total of 19 eligible SRs that included 241 unique PROM studies were captured from the initial 2074 records that were identified. Data were captured across a 30-year scope, with roughly half (47.4%, n=9/19) of the SRs published in the last 5 years. In total, 104 unique PROMs were identified. Inclusion of non-validated PROMs was identified in 63.2% (n=12/19) of the included SRs, and reporting issues were identified in 47.3% of studies (n=114/241). A lower journal impact factor was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of validity issues (r=0.44, p=0.04).Conclusion: There are a broad range of available PROMs; however, they have been reported inconsistently in the literature, often lacking significant evidence with respect to validity criteria. Standardization of reporting and assessments of validity may help to address this.Keywords: medication adherence, patient-reported outcomes measures, type 2 diabetes, validity, taxonomyhttps://www.dovepress.com/a-systematic-analysis-of-reviews-exploring-the-scope-validity-and-repo-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PPAmedication adherencepatient-reported outcomes measurestype 2 diabetesvaliditytaxonomy |
| spellingShingle | Wells J Crilly P Kayyali R A Systematic Analysis of Reviews Exploring the Scope, Validity, and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures of Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes Patient Preference and Adherence medication adherence patient-reported outcomes measures type 2 diabetes validity taxonomy |
| title | A Systematic Analysis of Reviews Exploring the Scope, Validity, and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures of Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes |
| title_full | A Systematic Analysis of Reviews Exploring the Scope, Validity, and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures of Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes |
| title_fullStr | A Systematic Analysis of Reviews Exploring the Scope, Validity, and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures of Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Analysis of Reviews Exploring the Scope, Validity, and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures of Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes |
| title_short | A Systematic Analysis of Reviews Exploring the Scope, Validity, and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures of Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes |
| title_sort | systematic analysis of reviews exploring the scope validity and reporting of patient reported outcomes measures of medication adherence in type 2 diabetes |
| topic | medication adherence patient-reported outcomes measures type 2 diabetes validity taxonomy |
| url | https://www.dovepress.com/a-systematic-analysis-of-reviews-exploring-the-scope-validity-and-repo-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PPA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wellsj asystematicanalysisofreviewsexploringthescopevalidityandreportingofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresofmedicationadherenceintype2diabetes AT crillyp asystematicanalysisofreviewsexploringthescopevalidityandreportingofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresofmedicationadherenceintype2diabetes AT kayyalir asystematicanalysisofreviewsexploringthescopevalidityandreportingofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresofmedicationadherenceintype2diabetes AT wellsj systematicanalysisofreviewsexploringthescopevalidityandreportingofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresofmedicationadherenceintype2diabetes AT crillyp systematicanalysisofreviewsexploringthescopevalidityandreportingofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresofmedicationadherenceintype2diabetes AT kayyalir systematicanalysisofreviewsexploringthescopevalidityandreportingofpatientreportedoutcomesmeasuresofmedicationadherenceintype2diabetes |