| Summary: | The profession of surgery has long purported to value its history. This study evaluates that interest by calculating the percent of historical articles in 4 major general surgery journals from 1885 to 2018 (Annals of Surgery; Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics; American Journal of Surgery; and Archives of Surgery). Of all articles published over the last 133 years, 1.65% focused on history, although this percentage fluctuated between 0% and 4.77%. A peak in the 1920s likely both represents and buttresses a national movement to elevate and professionalize the field of surgery. A plurality of the articles were biographical. The proportion of history articles in these journals has been declining of late due to reasons such as the proliferation of periodicals and impact factor considerations. The new Annals of Surgery—Open promises an ideal forum to publish this work, celebrate our heritage, and study the history of who we are as surgeons.
|
|---|