Assessing the Reliability of Merging Chickering & Gamson’s Seven Principles for Good Practice with Merrill’s Different Levels of Instructional Strategy (DLISt7)

Based on Chickering and Gamson’s (1987) Seven Principles for Good Practice, this research project attempted to revitalize the principles by merging them with Merrill’s (2006) Different Levels of Instructional Strategy. The aim was to develop, validate, and standardize a measurement instrument (DLISt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Syaril Izwann Jabar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Online Learning Consortium 2016-01-01
Series:Online Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/784
_version_ 1797327751971078144
author Syaril Izwann Jabar
author_facet Syaril Izwann Jabar
author_sort Syaril Izwann Jabar
collection DOAJ
description Based on Chickering and Gamson’s (1987) Seven Principles for Good Practice, this research project attempted to revitalize the principles by merging them with Merrill’s (2006) Different Levels of Instructional Strategy. The aim was to develop, validate, and standardize a measurement instrument (DLISt7) using a pretest-posttest Internet quasi-experiment. It was proposed that the instrument could then be used as a rubric either for facilitating the implementation of DLISt7, or as a set of unobtrusive diagnostic indicators for assessing the quality of learning experienced by students in blended and online courses. The study was conducted across five faculties at a regional Australian multi-campus university. The intent was to contribute to knowledge building by leveraging the data that had been collected, analyzed, and reported to generate awareness about the likelihood of scaffolding and scaling, varying levels of instructional strategies for communicating expectations, and relaying information. The idea was to produce a tool that would create more opportunities for more of the principles to be put to good use as an effectiveness multiplier. The findings from the analysis conducted using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis verified the validity of DLISt7 and demonstrated excellent internal reliability values.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:43:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-38c8e2b1acc54987bb70de5b5508809e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2472-5749
2472-5730
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:43:08Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Online Learning Consortium
record_format Article
series Online Learning
spelling doaj.art-38c8e2b1acc54987bb70de5b5508809e2024-02-03T08:25:32ZengOnline Learning ConsortiumOnline Learning2472-57492472-57302016-01-0120210.24059/olj.v20i2.784Assessing the Reliability of Merging Chickering & Gamson’s Seven Principles for Good Practice with Merrill’s Different Levels of Instructional Strategy (DLISt7)Syaril Izwann Jabar0University Selangor (UNISEL)Based on Chickering and Gamson’s (1987) Seven Principles for Good Practice, this research project attempted to revitalize the principles by merging them with Merrill’s (2006) Different Levels of Instructional Strategy. The aim was to develop, validate, and standardize a measurement instrument (DLISt7) using a pretest-posttest Internet quasi-experiment. It was proposed that the instrument could then be used as a rubric either for facilitating the implementation of DLISt7, or as a set of unobtrusive diagnostic indicators for assessing the quality of learning experienced by students in blended and online courses. The study was conducted across five faculties at a regional Australian multi-campus university. The intent was to contribute to knowledge building by leveraging the data that had been collected, analyzed, and reported to generate awareness about the likelihood of scaffolding and scaling, varying levels of instructional strategies for communicating expectations, and relaying information. The idea was to produce a tool that would create more opportunities for more of the principles to be put to good use as an effectiveness multiplier. The findings from the analysis conducted using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis verified the validity of DLISt7 and demonstrated excellent internal reliability values.https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/784Community of PracticeBlended LearningOnline LearningMeasurement Model
spellingShingle Syaril Izwann Jabar
Assessing the Reliability of Merging Chickering & Gamson’s Seven Principles for Good Practice with Merrill’s Different Levels of Instructional Strategy (DLISt7)
Online Learning
Community of Practice
Blended Learning
Online Learning
Measurement Model
title Assessing the Reliability of Merging Chickering & Gamson’s Seven Principles for Good Practice with Merrill’s Different Levels of Instructional Strategy (DLISt7)
title_full Assessing the Reliability of Merging Chickering & Gamson’s Seven Principles for Good Practice with Merrill’s Different Levels of Instructional Strategy (DLISt7)
title_fullStr Assessing the Reliability of Merging Chickering & Gamson’s Seven Principles for Good Practice with Merrill’s Different Levels of Instructional Strategy (DLISt7)
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Reliability of Merging Chickering & Gamson’s Seven Principles for Good Practice with Merrill’s Different Levels of Instructional Strategy (DLISt7)
title_short Assessing the Reliability of Merging Chickering & Gamson’s Seven Principles for Good Practice with Merrill’s Different Levels of Instructional Strategy (DLISt7)
title_sort assessing the reliability of merging chickering gamson s seven principles for good practice with merrill s different levels of instructional strategy dlist7
topic Community of Practice
Blended Learning
Online Learning
Measurement Model
url https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/784
work_keys_str_mv AT syarilizwannjabar assessingthereliabilityofmergingchickeringgamsonssevenprinciplesforgoodpracticewithmerrillsdifferentlevelsofinstructionalstrategydlist7