Construction of a DNA damage repair gene signature for predicting prognosis and immune response in breast cancer

DNA damage repair (DDR) genes are involved in developing breast cancer. Recently, a targeted therapeutic strategy through DNA repair machinery, including PARPi, has initially shown broad development and application prospects in breast cancer therapy. However, few studies that focused on the correlat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yiming Chang, Zhiyuan Huang, Hong Quan, Hui Li, Shuo Yang, Yifei Song, Jian Wang, Jian Yuan, Chenming Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1085632/full
_version_ 1797955957653766144
author Yiming Chang
Zhiyuan Huang
Hong Quan
Hui Li
Shuo Yang
Yifei Song
Jian Wang
Jian Yuan
Jian Yuan
Jian Yuan
Chenming Wu
author_facet Yiming Chang
Zhiyuan Huang
Hong Quan
Hui Li
Shuo Yang
Yifei Song
Jian Wang
Jian Yuan
Jian Yuan
Jian Yuan
Chenming Wu
author_sort Yiming Chang
collection DOAJ
description DNA damage repair (DDR) genes are involved in developing breast cancer. Recently, a targeted therapeutic strategy through DNA repair machinery, including PARPi, has initially shown broad development and application prospects in breast cancer therapy. However, few studies that focused on the correlation between the expression level of DNA repair genes, prognosis, and immune response in breast cancer patients have been recently conducted. Herein, we focused on identifying differentially expressed DNA repair genes (DEGs) in breast cancer specimens and normal samples using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Biofunction enrichment analysis was performed with DEGs using the R software “cluster Profiler” package. DNA repair genes were involved in multivariate and univariate Cox regression analyses. After the optimization by AIC value, 11 DNA repair genes were sorted as prognostic DNA repair genes for breast cancer patients to calculate risk scores. Simultaneously, a nomogram was used to represent the prognostic model, which was validated using a calibration curve and C-index. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), CIBERSORT algorithms, and ESTIMATE scores were applied to evaluate the immune filtration of tumor samples. Subsequently, anticarcinogen sensitivity analysis was performed using the R software “pRRophetic” package. Unsupervised clustering was used to excavate the correlation between the expression level of prognostic-significant DNA repair genes and clinical features. In summary, 56 DEGs were sorted, and their potential enriched biofunction pathways were revealed. In total, 11 DNA repair genes (UBE2A, RBBP8, RAD50, FAAP20, RPA3, ENDOV, DDB2, UBE2V2, MRE11, RRM2B, and PARP3) were preserved as prognostic genes to estimate risk score, which was applied to establish the prognostic model and stratified breast cancer patients into two groups with high or low risk. The calibration curve and C-index indicated that they reliably predicted the survival of breast cancer patients. Immune filtration analysis, anticarcinogen sensitivity analysis, and unsupervised clustering were applied to reveal the character of DNA repair genes between low- and high-risk groups. We identified 11 prognosis-significant DNA repair genes to establish prediction models and immune responses in breast cancer patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T23:42:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-38d95fb91411486ba8c5026008819ca5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T23:42:24Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-38d95fb91411486ba8c5026008819ca52023-01-11T06:13:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2023-01-011210.3389/fonc.2022.10856321085632Construction of a DNA damage repair gene signature for predicting prognosis and immune response in breast cancerYiming Chang0Zhiyuan Huang1Hong Quan2Hui Li3Shuo Yang4Yifei Song5Jian Wang6Jian Yuan7Jian Yuan8Jian Yuan9Chenming Wu10Jinzhou Medical University, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Medical Imaging, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaJi’an Hospital, Shanghai East Hospital, Ji’an, ChinaResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaDNA damage repair (DDR) genes are involved in developing breast cancer. Recently, a targeted therapeutic strategy through DNA repair machinery, including PARPi, has initially shown broad development and application prospects in breast cancer therapy. However, few studies that focused on the correlation between the expression level of DNA repair genes, prognosis, and immune response in breast cancer patients have been recently conducted. Herein, we focused on identifying differentially expressed DNA repair genes (DEGs) in breast cancer specimens and normal samples using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Biofunction enrichment analysis was performed with DEGs using the R software “cluster Profiler” package. DNA repair genes were involved in multivariate and univariate Cox regression analyses. After the optimization by AIC value, 11 DNA repair genes were sorted as prognostic DNA repair genes for breast cancer patients to calculate risk scores. Simultaneously, a nomogram was used to represent the prognostic model, which was validated using a calibration curve and C-index. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), CIBERSORT algorithms, and ESTIMATE scores were applied to evaluate the immune filtration of tumor samples. Subsequently, anticarcinogen sensitivity analysis was performed using the R software “pRRophetic” package. Unsupervised clustering was used to excavate the correlation between the expression level of prognostic-significant DNA repair genes and clinical features. In summary, 56 DEGs were sorted, and their potential enriched biofunction pathways were revealed. In total, 11 DNA repair genes (UBE2A, RBBP8, RAD50, FAAP20, RPA3, ENDOV, DDB2, UBE2V2, MRE11, RRM2B, and PARP3) were preserved as prognostic genes to estimate risk score, which was applied to establish the prognostic model and stratified breast cancer patients into two groups with high or low risk. The calibration curve and C-index indicated that they reliably predicted the survival of breast cancer patients. Immune filtration analysis, anticarcinogen sensitivity analysis, and unsupervised clustering were applied to reveal the character of DNA repair genes between low- and high-risk groups. We identified 11 prognosis-significant DNA repair genes to establish prediction models and immune responses in breast cancer patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1085632/fullbreast cancerprognostic modelimmune filtrationimmune responseDNA damage repair
spellingShingle Yiming Chang
Zhiyuan Huang
Hong Quan
Hui Li
Shuo Yang
Yifei Song
Jian Wang
Jian Yuan
Jian Yuan
Jian Yuan
Chenming Wu
Construction of a DNA damage repair gene signature for predicting prognosis and immune response in breast cancer
Frontiers in Oncology
breast cancer
prognostic model
immune filtration
immune response
DNA damage repair
title Construction of a DNA damage repair gene signature for predicting prognosis and immune response in breast cancer
title_full Construction of a DNA damage repair gene signature for predicting prognosis and immune response in breast cancer
title_fullStr Construction of a DNA damage repair gene signature for predicting prognosis and immune response in breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Construction of a DNA damage repair gene signature for predicting prognosis and immune response in breast cancer
title_short Construction of a DNA damage repair gene signature for predicting prognosis and immune response in breast cancer
title_sort construction of a dna damage repair gene signature for predicting prognosis and immune response in breast cancer
topic breast cancer
prognostic model
immune filtration
immune response
DNA damage repair
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1085632/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yimingchang constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer
AT zhiyuanhuang constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer
AT hongquan constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer
AT huili constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer
AT shuoyang constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer
AT yifeisong constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer
AT jianwang constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer
AT jianyuan constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer
AT jianyuan constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer
AT jianyuan constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer
AT chenmingwu constructionofadnadamagerepairgenesignatureforpredictingprognosisandimmuneresponseinbreastcancer