Digitally Engaged Rural Community Development
First paragraphs: As a scholar working with the Regional and Rural Broadband research team in Canada (see http://www.r2b2project.ca), I was motivated to review Responsive Countryside: The Digital Age and Rural Communities, by Roberto Gallardo, to learn more about digitally engaged rural community d...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
2016-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/428 |
_version_ | 1797705907972341760 |
---|---|
author | Laxmi Prasad Pant |
author_facet | Laxmi Prasad Pant |
author_sort | Laxmi Prasad Pant |
collection | DOAJ |
description | First paragraphs:
As a scholar working with the Regional and Rural Broadband research team in Canada (see http://www.r2b2project.ca), I was motivated to review Responsive Countryside: The Digital Age and Rural Communities, by Roberto Gallardo, to learn more about digitally engaged rural community development in the U.S. I begin this review with Gallardo's contextual discussion of the U.S. countryside. I then consider Gallardo's examples of digital revolutions in rural community development and finally reflect on this book's scholarly contributions.
In defining the term "rural" in Chapter 1, Gallardo clearly appreciates that, unlike in the past, businesses and livelihoods in the countryside are not only about agriculture. Rural is a geographic concept that connotes location and lifestyle. In the U.S., there have been profound changes in rural areas (those without an urban core of at least 10,000 residents) and small cities (those with an urban core of 10,000 to 49,999 residents). Gallardo produces an evidence base that, contrary to general perceptions, the population in the U.S. countryside is growing. This also applies to rural parts of other countries, such as Canada. However, population growth rates in the countryside are slower than in metro areas. The U.S. population is also aging, and rural communities and small cities are aging faster than metro areas. Further, the U.S. population is becoming more diverse, with a decrease in white non-Hispanics and an increase in Hispanics, even in rural areas. Gallardo argues that these changes are due to new technologies, not the least of which are digital revolutions..... |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:44:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-38db12d12ada40bfbd122cf09c2caf06 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2152-0801 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:44:18Z |
publishDate | 2016-10-01 |
publisher | Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development |
spelling | doaj.art-38db12d12ada40bfbd122cf09c2caf062023-09-03T05:43:19ZengLyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food SystemsJournal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development2152-08012016-10-016410.5304/jafscd.2016.064.005428Digitally Engaged Rural Community DevelopmentLaxmi Prasad Pant0University of GuelphFirst paragraphs: As a scholar working with the Regional and Rural Broadband research team in Canada (see http://www.r2b2project.ca), I was motivated to review Responsive Countryside: The Digital Age and Rural Communities, by Roberto Gallardo, to learn more about digitally engaged rural community development in the U.S. I begin this review with Gallardo's contextual discussion of the U.S. countryside. I then consider Gallardo's examples of digital revolutions in rural community development and finally reflect on this book's scholarly contributions. In defining the term "rural" in Chapter 1, Gallardo clearly appreciates that, unlike in the past, businesses and livelihoods in the countryside are not only about agriculture. Rural is a geographic concept that connotes location and lifestyle. In the U.S., there have been profound changes in rural areas (those without an urban core of at least 10,000 residents) and small cities (those with an urban core of 10,000 to 49,999 residents). Gallardo produces an evidence base that, contrary to general perceptions, the population in the U.S. countryside is growing. This also applies to rural parts of other countries, such as Canada. However, population growth rates in the countryside are slower than in metro areas. The U.S. population is also aging, and rural communities and small cities are aging faster than metro areas. Further, the U.S. population is becoming more diverse, with a decrease in white non-Hispanics and an increase in Hispanics, even in rural areas. Gallardo argues that these changes are due to new technologies, not the least of which are digital revolutions.....https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/428Digital AgeRural Community DevelopmentTechnology |
spellingShingle | Laxmi Prasad Pant Digitally Engaged Rural Community Development Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development Digital Age Rural Community Development Technology |
title | Digitally Engaged Rural Community Development |
title_full | Digitally Engaged Rural Community Development |
title_fullStr | Digitally Engaged Rural Community Development |
title_full_unstemmed | Digitally Engaged Rural Community Development |
title_short | Digitally Engaged Rural Community Development |
title_sort | digitally engaged rural community development |
topic | Digital Age Rural Community Development Technology |
url | https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laxmiprasadpant digitallyengagedruralcommunitydevelopment |