Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems?
Changing patterns in collaborative research networks reflect a new geography of science that is increasingly shaped by interactions between established and emerging scientific powers, whose cultural and political diversity are now reflected in perhaps never before thought of interactions. The variou...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
American Society for Microbiology
2014-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education |
| Online Access: | https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.867 |
| _version_ | 1818402738652839936 |
|---|---|
| author | Sonia Vasconcelos Daniel Vasgird Iekuni Ichikawa Dena Plemmons |
| author_facet | Sonia Vasconcelos Daniel Vasgird Iekuni Ichikawa Dena Plemmons |
| author_sort | Sonia Vasconcelos |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Changing patterns in collaborative research networks reflect a new geography of science that is increasingly shaped by interactions between established and emerging scientific powers, whose cultural and political diversity are now reflected in perhaps never before thought of interactions. The various partners in these international collaborations are likely to produce research results that should gradually lead to stronger diversity in research output, including an increase in international co-authorship. When it comes to multinational co-authored publications, among sensitive questions that may complicate these relationships is the way different research systems deal with research integrity. It is well worth examining how to accommodate different cultural traditions and normative assumptions embedded in academic practices for collaborative research networks. Given the increasingly international and interdisciplinary nature of science and engineering, any guidelines for authorship practices in international collaborations must be clear about the variations that exist across disciplines and cultures, variations which will have an impact on accepted practices and expectations for collaboration. Collaborative endeavors in research will succeed only if a broader understanding of potential obstacles to these collaborations is reached. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T08:13:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-38def81ebe994574a1c9775472f0f536 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1935-7877 1935-7885 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T08:13:08Z |
| publishDate | 2014-12-01 |
| publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education |
| spelling | doaj.art-38def81ebe994574a1c9775472f0f5362022-12-21T23:10:01ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologyJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education1935-78771935-78852014-12-0115215515810.1128/jmbe.v15i2.867Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems?Sonia Vasconcelos0Daniel Vasgird1Iekuni Ichikawa2Dena Plemmons3Science Education Program, Institute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), BrazilOffice of Research Integrity and Compliance, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6845, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, United States, and Shinshu University, Nagano, JapanResearch Ethics Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0612, United StatesChanging patterns in collaborative research networks reflect a new geography of science that is increasingly shaped by interactions between established and emerging scientific powers, whose cultural and political diversity are now reflected in perhaps never before thought of interactions. The various partners in these international collaborations are likely to produce research results that should gradually lead to stronger diversity in research output, including an increase in international co-authorship. When it comes to multinational co-authored publications, among sensitive questions that may complicate these relationships is the way different research systems deal with research integrity. It is well worth examining how to accommodate different cultural traditions and normative assumptions embedded in academic practices for collaborative research networks. Given the increasingly international and interdisciplinary nature of science and engineering, any guidelines for authorship practices in international collaborations must be clear about the variations that exist across disciplines and cultures, variations which will have an impact on accepted practices and expectations for collaboration. Collaborative endeavors in research will succeed only if a broader understanding of potential obstacles to these collaborations is reached.https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.867 |
| spellingShingle | Sonia Vasconcelos Daniel Vasgird Iekuni Ichikawa Dena Plemmons Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education |
| title | Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
| title_full | Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
| title_fullStr | Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
| title_short | Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
| title_sort | authorship guidelines and actual practice are they harmonized in different research systems |
| url | https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.867 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT soniavasconcelos authorshipguidelinesandactualpracticearetheyharmonizedindifferentresearchsystems AT danielvasgird authorshipguidelinesandactualpracticearetheyharmonizedindifferentresearchsystems AT iekuniichikawa authorshipguidelinesandactualpracticearetheyharmonizedindifferentresearchsystems AT denaplemmons authorshipguidelinesandactualpracticearetheyharmonizedindifferentresearchsystems |