Automated Design Optimization of a Mono Tiltrotor in Hovering and Cruising States

A mono tiltrotor (MTR) design which combines concepts of a tiltrotor and coaxial rotor is presented. The aerodynamic modeling of the MTR based on blade element momentum theory (BEMT) is conducted, and the method is fully validated with previous experimental data. An automated optimization approach i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lifang Zeng, Jianxin Hu, Dingyi Pan, Xueming Shao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1155
_version_ 1828115530793353216
author Lifang Zeng
Jianxin Hu
Dingyi Pan
Xueming Shao
author_facet Lifang Zeng
Jianxin Hu
Dingyi Pan
Xueming Shao
author_sort Lifang Zeng
collection DOAJ
description A mono tiltrotor (MTR) design which combines concepts of a tiltrotor and coaxial rotor is presented. The aerodynamic modeling of the MTR based on blade element momentum theory (BEMT) is conducted, and the method is fully validated with previous experimental data. An automated optimization approach integrating BEMT modeling and optimization algorithms is developed. Parameters such as inter-rotor spacing, blade twist, taper ratio and aspect ratio are chosen as design variables. Single-objective (in hovering or in cruising state) optimizations and multi-objective (both in hovering and cruising states) optimizations are studied at preset design points; i.e., hovering trim and cruising trim. Two single-objective optimizations result in different sets of parameter selections according to the different design objectives. The multi-objective optimization is applied to obtain an identical and compromised selection of design parameters. An optimal point is chosen from the Pareto front of the multi-objective optimization. The optimized design has a better performance in terms of the figure of merit (FM) and propulsive efficiency, which are improved by 7.3% for FM and 13.4% for propulsive efficiency from the prototype, respectively. Further aerodynamic analysis confirmed that the optimized rotor has a much more uniform load distribution along the blade span, and therefore a better aerodynamic performance in both hovering and cruising states is achieved.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:41:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-38e6e8f73f804823832ef78c41d52e78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:41:47Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-38e6e8f73f804823832ef78c41d52e782022-12-22T04:23:28ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-03-01135115510.3390/en13051155en13051155Automated Design Optimization of a Mono Tiltrotor in Hovering and Cruising StatesLifang Zeng0Jianxin Hu1Dingyi Pan2Xueming Shao3School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering & Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, ChinaSchool of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaSchool of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaA mono tiltrotor (MTR) design which combines concepts of a tiltrotor and coaxial rotor is presented. The aerodynamic modeling of the MTR based on blade element momentum theory (BEMT) is conducted, and the method is fully validated with previous experimental data. An automated optimization approach integrating BEMT modeling and optimization algorithms is developed. Parameters such as inter-rotor spacing, blade twist, taper ratio and aspect ratio are chosen as design variables. Single-objective (in hovering or in cruising state) optimizations and multi-objective (both in hovering and cruising states) optimizations are studied at preset design points; i.e., hovering trim and cruising trim. Two single-objective optimizations result in different sets of parameter selections according to the different design objectives. The multi-objective optimization is applied to obtain an identical and compromised selection of design parameters. An optimal point is chosen from the Pareto front of the multi-objective optimization. The optimized design has a better performance in terms of the figure of merit (FM) and propulsive efficiency, which are improved by 7.3% for FM and 13.4% for propulsive efficiency from the prototype, respectively. Further aerodynamic analysis confirmed that the optimized rotor has a much more uniform load distribution along the blade span, and therefore a better aerodynamic performance in both hovering and cruising states is achieved.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1155mono tiltrotor (mtr)multi-objective optimizationbemtfigure of meritpropulsive efficiency
spellingShingle Lifang Zeng
Jianxin Hu
Dingyi Pan
Xueming Shao
Automated Design Optimization of a Mono Tiltrotor in Hovering and Cruising States
Energies
mono tiltrotor (mtr)
multi-objective optimization
bemt
figure of merit
propulsive efficiency
title Automated Design Optimization of a Mono Tiltrotor in Hovering and Cruising States
title_full Automated Design Optimization of a Mono Tiltrotor in Hovering and Cruising States
title_fullStr Automated Design Optimization of a Mono Tiltrotor in Hovering and Cruising States
title_full_unstemmed Automated Design Optimization of a Mono Tiltrotor in Hovering and Cruising States
title_short Automated Design Optimization of a Mono Tiltrotor in Hovering and Cruising States
title_sort automated design optimization of a mono tiltrotor in hovering and cruising states
topic mono tiltrotor (mtr)
multi-objective optimization
bemt
figure of merit
propulsive efficiency
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1155
work_keys_str_mv AT lifangzeng automateddesignoptimizationofamonotiltrotorinhoveringandcruisingstates
AT jianxinhu automateddesignoptimizationofamonotiltrotorinhoveringandcruisingstates
AT dingyipan automateddesignoptimizationofamonotiltrotorinhoveringandcruisingstates
AT xuemingshao automateddesignoptimizationofamonotiltrotorinhoveringandcruisingstates