Comparison of angiogenic potential in vitrified vs. slow frozen human ovarian tissue

Abstract Vitrification of ovarian tissue is a promising alternative approach to the traditional slow freezing method. Few empirical investigations have been conducted to determine the angiogenic profiles of these two freezing methods. In this study we aimed to answer the question whether one of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Schallmoser, Rebekka Einenkel, Cara Färber, Vanessa Hüren, Norah Emrich, Julia John, Nicole Sänger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39920-x
_version_ 1797452569925124096
author Andreas Schallmoser
Rebekka Einenkel
Cara Färber
Vanessa Hüren
Norah Emrich
Julia John
Nicole Sänger
author_facet Andreas Schallmoser
Rebekka Einenkel
Cara Färber
Vanessa Hüren
Norah Emrich
Julia John
Nicole Sänger
author_sort Andreas Schallmoser
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Vitrification of ovarian tissue is a promising alternative approach to the traditional slow freezing method. Few empirical investigations have been conducted to determine the angiogenic profiles of these two freezing methods. In this study we aimed to answer the question whether one of the cryopreservation methods should be preferred based on the secretion of angiogenic factors. Tissue culture with reduced oxygen (5%) was conducted for 48 h with samples of fresh, slow frozen/thawed and vitrified/rapid warmed ovarian cortex tissue from 20 patients. From each patient, tissue was used in all three treatment groups. Tissue culture supernatants were determined regarding cytokine expression profiles of angiogenin, angiopoietin-2, epidermal growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, heparin binding epidermal growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, Leptin, Platelet-derived growth factor B, placental growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor A via fluoroimmunoassay. Apoptotic changes were assessed by TUNEL staining of cryosections and supplemented by hematoxylin and eosin and proliferating cell nuclear antigen staining. Comparing the angiogenic expression profiles of vitrified/rapid warmed tissue with slow frozen/thawed tissue samples, no significant differences were observed. Detection of apoptotic DNA fragmentation via TUNEL indicated minor apoptotic profiles that were not significantly different comparing both cryopreservation methods. Vitrification of ovarian cortical tissue does not appear to impact negatively on the expression profile of angiogenic factors and may be regarded as an effective alternative approach to the traditional slow freezing method.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:10:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-38e96f35ca3d4052b1bfd6eadb6fbffb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:10:35Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-38e96f35ca3d4052b1bfd6eadb6fbffb2023-11-26T13:24:28ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-08-0113111010.1038/s41598-023-39920-xComparison of angiogenic potential in vitrified vs. slow frozen human ovarian tissueAndreas Schallmoser0Rebekka Einenkel1Cara Färber2Vanessa Hüren3Norah Emrich4Julia John5Nicole Sänger6Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of BonnDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of BonnDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of BonnDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of BonnDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of BonnDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of BonnDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of BonnAbstract Vitrification of ovarian tissue is a promising alternative approach to the traditional slow freezing method. Few empirical investigations have been conducted to determine the angiogenic profiles of these two freezing methods. In this study we aimed to answer the question whether one of the cryopreservation methods should be preferred based on the secretion of angiogenic factors. Tissue culture with reduced oxygen (5%) was conducted for 48 h with samples of fresh, slow frozen/thawed and vitrified/rapid warmed ovarian cortex tissue from 20 patients. From each patient, tissue was used in all three treatment groups. Tissue culture supernatants were determined regarding cytokine expression profiles of angiogenin, angiopoietin-2, epidermal growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, heparin binding epidermal growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, Leptin, Platelet-derived growth factor B, placental growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor A via fluoroimmunoassay. Apoptotic changes were assessed by TUNEL staining of cryosections and supplemented by hematoxylin and eosin and proliferating cell nuclear antigen staining. Comparing the angiogenic expression profiles of vitrified/rapid warmed tissue with slow frozen/thawed tissue samples, no significant differences were observed. Detection of apoptotic DNA fragmentation via TUNEL indicated minor apoptotic profiles that were not significantly different comparing both cryopreservation methods. Vitrification of ovarian cortical tissue does not appear to impact negatively on the expression profile of angiogenic factors and may be regarded as an effective alternative approach to the traditional slow freezing method.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39920-x
spellingShingle Andreas Schallmoser
Rebekka Einenkel
Cara Färber
Vanessa Hüren
Norah Emrich
Julia John
Nicole Sänger
Comparison of angiogenic potential in vitrified vs. slow frozen human ovarian tissue
Scientific Reports
title Comparison of angiogenic potential in vitrified vs. slow frozen human ovarian tissue
title_full Comparison of angiogenic potential in vitrified vs. slow frozen human ovarian tissue
title_fullStr Comparison of angiogenic potential in vitrified vs. slow frozen human ovarian tissue
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of angiogenic potential in vitrified vs. slow frozen human ovarian tissue
title_short Comparison of angiogenic potential in vitrified vs. slow frozen human ovarian tissue
title_sort comparison of angiogenic potential in vitrified vs slow frozen human ovarian tissue
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39920-x
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasschallmoser comparisonofangiogenicpotentialinvitrifiedvsslowfrozenhumanovariantissue
AT rebekkaeinenkel comparisonofangiogenicpotentialinvitrifiedvsslowfrozenhumanovariantissue
AT carafarber comparisonofangiogenicpotentialinvitrifiedvsslowfrozenhumanovariantissue
AT vanessahuren comparisonofangiogenicpotentialinvitrifiedvsslowfrozenhumanovariantissue
AT norahemrich comparisonofangiogenicpotentialinvitrifiedvsslowfrozenhumanovariantissue
AT juliajohn comparisonofangiogenicpotentialinvitrifiedvsslowfrozenhumanovariantissue
AT nicolesanger comparisonofangiogenicpotentialinvitrifiedvsslowfrozenhumanovariantissue