State-level autonomy in the era of accountability: A comparative analysis of Virginia and Nebraska education policy through No Child Left Behind
Following the 1983 A Nation at Risk report and culminating in No Child Left Behind (NCLB), states designed and implemented accountability policies to evaluate student achievement. External assessments of these policies identified substantial variability in the level of stakes associated with each sy...
Main Author: | Ryan Richard Ruff |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Arizona State University
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/4013 |
Similar Items
-
Conflicting demands of No Child Left Behind and state systems: Mixed messages about school performance.
by: Robert L. Linn
Published: (2005-06-01) -
Bullying victimization and child sexual abuse among left-behind and non-left-behind children in China
by: Li Yan, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Teachers' Perceptions of the Influence of No Child Left Behind On Classroom Practices
by: Craig Alan Mertler
Published: (2010-09-01) -
Corrective Action in Low Performing Schools: Lessons for NCLB Implementation from First-generation Accountability Systems. Vol. 13 No. 48
by: Heinrich Mintrop, et al.
Published: (2005-12-01) -
Social Cognitive Domain Coordination in Left-Behind Children: A Comparative Study of Left-Behind and Non-Left-Behind Children in Rural China
by: Jianjin Liu
Published: (2016-09-01)