Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire
Abstract. Introduction and Objectives:. Chronic pain is a common postcollision consequence. Wherein, a clearer understanding of acute pain can help stem the acute-to-chronic pain transition. However, the variability of acute pain is only partially explained by psychophysical pain characteristics as...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | PAIN Reports |
| Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000821 |
| _version_ | 1811285608021098496 |
|---|---|
| author | Pora Kuperman Yelena Granovsky Hany Bahouth Shiri Fadel Hen Ben Lulu Noam Bosak Chen Buxbaum Elliot Sprecher Shoshana Crystal Michal Granot |
| author_facet | Pora Kuperman Yelena Granovsky Hany Bahouth Shiri Fadel Hen Ben Lulu Noam Bosak Chen Buxbaum Elliot Sprecher Shoshana Crystal Michal Granot |
| author_sort | Pora Kuperman |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract. Introduction and Objectives:. Chronic pain is a common postcollision consequence. Wherein, a clearer understanding of acute pain can help stem the acute-to-chronic pain transition. However, the variability of acute pain is only partially explained by psychophysical pain characteristics as measured by quantitative sensory testing. The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) may reflect inherent psychocognitive representations of patient's sensitivity and thus may reveal less-explored pain dimensions. In the vein of the biopsychosocial approach, this study aimed to explore whether PSQ holds additive value in explaining head and neck pain reports in very early acute-stage mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) after collision, above the use of psychophysical assessment.
Methods:. Study cohort (n = 130) consisted of mTBI patients (age range 19–66, 57 F) after accident with area-of-injury pain of at least 20 on the day of testing (mean pain 58.4 ± 21.6, range 20–100 Numerical Pain Scale) who underwent clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological assessment within 72-hour after injury.
Results:. Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire scores were significantly correlated with acute clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological measures. Regression model (R2 = 0.241, P < 0.001) showed that, together, age, sex, high PSQ, enhanced temporal summation, and less-efficient conditioned pain modulation explained head and neck pain variance. This model demonstrated that the strongest contribution to degree of postinjury pain was independently explained by PSQ (ß = 0.32) and then pressure pain threshold-conditioned pain modulation (ß = −0.25).
Conclusion:. Appraisal of cognitive daily-pain representations, by way of memory and imagination, provides an additional important dispositional facet to explain the variability in the acute mTBI postcollision clinical pain experience, above assessing nociceptive responsiveness to experimentally induced pain. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T02:47:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-394e6498255647e7b5e4925e69a6ef7f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2471-2531 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T02:47:30Z |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PAIN Reports |
| spelling | doaj.art-394e6498255647e7b5e4925e69a6ef7f2022-12-22T03:05:58ZengWolters KluwerPAIN Reports2471-25312020-06-0153e82110.1097/PR9.0000000000000821202006000-00001Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnairePora Kuperman0Yelena Granovsky1Hany Bahouth2Shiri Fadel3Hen Ben Lulu4Noam Bosak5Chen Buxbaum6Elliot Sprecher7Shoshana Crystal8Michal Granot9a Faculty of Medicine, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israela Faculty of Medicine, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israelb Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israela Faculty of Medicine, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israelb Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israelc Department of Neurology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israelc Department of Neurology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israelc Department of Neurology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israela Faculty of Medicine, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israeld Faculty of Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, IsraelAbstract. Introduction and Objectives:. Chronic pain is a common postcollision consequence. Wherein, a clearer understanding of acute pain can help stem the acute-to-chronic pain transition. However, the variability of acute pain is only partially explained by psychophysical pain characteristics as measured by quantitative sensory testing. The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) may reflect inherent psychocognitive representations of patient's sensitivity and thus may reveal less-explored pain dimensions. In the vein of the biopsychosocial approach, this study aimed to explore whether PSQ holds additive value in explaining head and neck pain reports in very early acute-stage mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) after collision, above the use of psychophysical assessment. Methods:. Study cohort (n = 130) consisted of mTBI patients (age range 19–66, 57 F) after accident with area-of-injury pain of at least 20 on the day of testing (mean pain 58.4 ± 21.6, range 20–100 Numerical Pain Scale) who underwent clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological assessment within 72-hour after injury. Results:. Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire scores were significantly correlated with acute clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological measures. Regression model (R2 = 0.241, P < 0.001) showed that, together, age, sex, high PSQ, enhanced temporal summation, and less-efficient conditioned pain modulation explained head and neck pain variance. This model demonstrated that the strongest contribution to degree of postinjury pain was independently explained by PSQ (ß = 0.32) and then pressure pain threshold-conditioned pain modulation (ß = −0.25). Conclusion:. Appraisal of cognitive daily-pain representations, by way of memory and imagination, provides an additional important dispositional facet to explain the variability in the acute mTBI postcollision clinical pain experience, above assessing nociceptive responsiveness to experimentally induced pain.http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000821 |
| spellingShingle | Pora Kuperman Yelena Granovsky Hany Bahouth Shiri Fadel Hen Ben Lulu Noam Bosak Chen Buxbaum Elliot Sprecher Shoshana Crystal Michal Granot Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire PAIN Reports |
| title | Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire |
| title_full | Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire |
| title_fullStr | Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire |
| title_full_unstemmed | Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire |
| title_short | Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire |
| title_sort | explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire |
| url | http://journals.lww.com/painrpts/fulltext/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000821 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT porakuperman explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire AT yelenagranovsky explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire AT hanybahouth explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire AT shirifadel explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire AT henbenlulu explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire AT noambosak explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire AT chenbuxbaum explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire AT elliotsprecher explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire AT shoshanacrystal explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire AT michalgranot explainingveryearlyacutemildtraumaticbraininjuryaftermotorvehiclecollisionpainvariabilityadditivevalueofpainsensitivityquestionnaire |