What Do We Know about Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Polish Hospitals? A Questionnaire Study

Background: Sepsis and septic shock are medical emergencies with a high risk of poor prognosis. We investigate the correspondence between Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines and clinical practice in Poland, with special attention given to differences between ICU and non-ICU environments as we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Łukasz J. Krzych, Agnieszka Wiórek, Paweł Zatorski, Karol Gruca, Karina Stefańska-Wronka, Janusz Trzebicki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/2/140
_version_ 1797416923289354240
author Łukasz J. Krzych
Agnieszka Wiórek
Paweł Zatorski
Karol Gruca
Karina Stefańska-Wronka
Janusz Trzebicki
author_facet Łukasz J. Krzych
Agnieszka Wiórek
Paweł Zatorski
Karol Gruca
Karina Stefańska-Wronka
Janusz Trzebicki
author_sort Łukasz J. Krzych
collection DOAJ
description Background: Sepsis and septic shock are medical emergencies with a high risk of poor prognosis. We investigate the correspondence between Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines and clinical practice in Poland, with special attention given to differences between ICU and non-ICU environments as well as regional variations within the country. Methods: A web-based questionnaire study was performed on a random sample of 60 hospitals from the three most populated regions in Poland—Masovia, Silesia, and Greater Poland. A 19-item questionnaire was built based on the most recent edition of SSC guidelines. Results: Sepsis diagnosis was primarily based on clinical evaluation (ICUs: 94%, non-ICUs: 62%; <i>p</i> = 0.02). There were significant differences between ICUs and non-ICUs regarding taking blood cultures for pathogen identification (2-times more frequent in ICUs) and having hospital-based operating procedures to adjust antimicrobial treatment to a clinical scenario (a difference of 17%). Modification of empiric antimicrobial treatment was required post-ICU admission in 70% of cases. ICUs differed from non-ICUs with regard to the methods of fluid responsiveness assessment and the types of catecholamines and fluids used to treat septic shock. The mean fluid load applied before the implementation of catecholamines was 25.8 ± 10.6 mL/kg. Norepinephrine was the first-line agent used to treat shock, and balanced crystalloids were preferred in both ICUs and non-ICUs. Conclusion: Compliance with SCC guidelines in Polish hospitals is insufficient, especially outside ICUs. There is a need for education among healthcare professionals to reach at least an acceptable level of knowledge and attitude in this field.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:11:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-39525f1cf0f0485aa263c5c95708c93d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9032
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:11:23Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Healthcare
spelling doaj.art-39525f1cf0f0485aa263c5c95708c93d2023-12-03T11:58:01ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322021-02-019214010.3390/healthcare9020140What Do We Know about Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Polish Hospitals? A Questionnaire StudyŁukasz J. Krzych0Agnieszka Wiórek1Paweł Zatorski2Karol Gruca3Karina Stefańska-Wronka4Janusz Trzebicki5Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 14 Medyków Street, 40-752 Katowice, PolandDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 14 Medyków Street, 40-752 Katowice, PolandFirst Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, PolandStudents’ Scientific Society of the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 14 Medyków Street, 40-752 Katowice, PolandDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, District Hospital in Poznań, 60-479 Poznań, PolandFirst Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, PolandBackground: Sepsis and septic shock are medical emergencies with a high risk of poor prognosis. We investigate the correspondence between Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines and clinical practice in Poland, with special attention given to differences between ICU and non-ICU environments as well as regional variations within the country. Methods: A web-based questionnaire study was performed on a random sample of 60 hospitals from the three most populated regions in Poland—Masovia, Silesia, and Greater Poland. A 19-item questionnaire was built based on the most recent edition of SSC guidelines. Results: Sepsis diagnosis was primarily based on clinical evaluation (ICUs: 94%, non-ICUs: 62%; <i>p</i> = 0.02). There were significant differences between ICUs and non-ICUs regarding taking blood cultures for pathogen identification (2-times more frequent in ICUs) and having hospital-based operating procedures to adjust antimicrobial treatment to a clinical scenario (a difference of 17%). Modification of empiric antimicrobial treatment was required post-ICU admission in 70% of cases. ICUs differed from non-ICUs with regard to the methods of fluid responsiveness assessment and the types of catecholamines and fluids used to treat septic shock. The mean fluid load applied before the implementation of catecholamines was 25.8 ± 10.6 mL/kg. Norepinephrine was the first-line agent used to treat shock, and balanced crystalloids were preferred in both ICUs and non-ICUs. Conclusion: Compliance with SCC guidelines in Polish hospitals is insufficient, especially outside ICUs. There is a need for education among healthcare professionals to reach at least an acceptable level of knowledge and attitude in this field.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/2/140guidelines compliance comparisonintensive care unitsepsis guidelines adherencesepsis and septic shock managementSurviving Sepsis Campaign
spellingShingle Łukasz J. Krzych
Agnieszka Wiórek
Paweł Zatorski
Karol Gruca
Karina Stefańska-Wronka
Janusz Trzebicki
What Do We Know about Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Polish Hospitals? A Questionnaire Study
Healthcare
guidelines compliance comparison
intensive care unit
sepsis guidelines adherence
sepsis and septic shock management
Surviving Sepsis Campaign
title What Do We Know about Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Polish Hospitals? A Questionnaire Study
title_full What Do We Know about Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Polish Hospitals? A Questionnaire Study
title_fullStr What Do We Know about Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Polish Hospitals? A Questionnaire Study
title_full_unstemmed What Do We Know about Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Polish Hospitals? A Questionnaire Study
title_short What Do We Know about Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Polish Hospitals? A Questionnaire Study
title_sort what do we know about early management of sepsis and septic shock in polish hospitals a questionnaire study
topic guidelines compliance comparison
intensive care unit
sepsis guidelines adherence
sepsis and septic shock management
Surviving Sepsis Campaign
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/2/140
work_keys_str_mv AT łukaszjkrzych whatdoweknowaboutearlymanagementofsepsisandsepticshockinpolishhospitalsaquestionnairestudy
AT agnieszkawiorek whatdoweknowaboutearlymanagementofsepsisandsepticshockinpolishhospitalsaquestionnairestudy
AT pawełzatorski whatdoweknowaboutearlymanagementofsepsisandsepticshockinpolishhospitalsaquestionnairestudy
AT karolgruca whatdoweknowaboutearlymanagementofsepsisandsepticshockinpolishhospitalsaquestionnairestudy
AT karinastefanskawronka whatdoweknowaboutearlymanagementofsepsisandsepticshockinpolishhospitalsaquestionnairestudy
AT janusztrzebicki whatdoweknowaboutearlymanagementofsepsisandsepticshockinpolishhospitalsaquestionnairestudy