Full thickness vs sliced mosaic cartilage graft in tympanoplasty: a comparative study

Abstract Background Tympanoplasty is one of the most performed procedures in otorhinolaryngology—head and neck surgery. Reconstruction of hearing is one of its targeted goals (Jeffery et al., J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 46:48, 2017). Closure of tympanic membrane was accomplished by various grafts....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mahmoud S. Elfouly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-07-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00109-6
_version_ 1797203086184284160
author Mahmoud S. Elfouly
author_facet Mahmoud S. Elfouly
author_sort Mahmoud S. Elfouly
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Tympanoplasty is one of the most performed procedures in otorhinolaryngology—head and neck surgery. Reconstruction of hearing is one of its targeted goals (Jeffery et al., J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 46:48, 2017). Closure of tympanic membrane was accomplished by various grafts. Temporalis fascia is commonly used in tympanoplasty but it could not withstand pressure variations due to its low elasticity (Sözen et al., J Craniofac Surg 23:e280-e283, 2012). Cartilage was preferred in this condition owing to its rigidity (Zhang et al., Otol Neurotol 32:1234-1238, 2011). However, this rigid character is thought to hinder the acoustic transfer through the cartilage (Bozdemir et al., ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 74:28-32, 2012). This study was conducted to determine the acoustic characteristics of sliced mosaic cartilage tympanoplasty. Results Comparable success rates were found among the 2 groups at 3 months postoperatively; 14 cases (88%) in group 1 and 20 cases (91%) in group 2. One year postoperatively, two cases with healed perforation in group 2 showed re-perforation; resulting in decreasing success rate to 81%, in contrast to constant success rate (88%) in the corresponding follow-up in group 1. However, the difference between the two groups remained insignificant (P = 1 in both follow ups). Conclusion Using split thickness cartilage slices arranged in mosaic pattern in type I tympanoplasty successfully overcame the hindering effect of cartilage on acoustic transfer, with no fear regarding take rate or complications.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:13:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-396beb4035064a0c972f2e5a7c4c7cde
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1012-5574
2090-8539
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:13:44Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
spelling doaj.art-396beb4035064a0c972f2e5a7c4c7cde2024-04-17T04:38:35ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology1012-55742090-85392021-07-013711510.1186/s43163-021-00109-6Full thickness vs sliced mosaic cartilage graft in tympanoplasty: a comparative studyMahmoud S. Elfouly0Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityAbstract Background Tympanoplasty is one of the most performed procedures in otorhinolaryngology—head and neck surgery. Reconstruction of hearing is one of its targeted goals (Jeffery et al., J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 46:48, 2017). Closure of tympanic membrane was accomplished by various grafts. Temporalis fascia is commonly used in tympanoplasty but it could not withstand pressure variations due to its low elasticity (Sözen et al., J Craniofac Surg 23:e280-e283, 2012). Cartilage was preferred in this condition owing to its rigidity (Zhang et al., Otol Neurotol 32:1234-1238, 2011). However, this rigid character is thought to hinder the acoustic transfer through the cartilage (Bozdemir et al., ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 74:28-32, 2012). This study was conducted to determine the acoustic characteristics of sliced mosaic cartilage tympanoplasty. Results Comparable success rates were found among the 2 groups at 3 months postoperatively; 14 cases (88%) in group 1 and 20 cases (91%) in group 2. One year postoperatively, two cases with healed perforation in group 2 showed re-perforation; resulting in decreasing success rate to 81%, in contrast to constant success rate (88%) in the corresponding follow-up in group 1. However, the difference between the two groups remained insignificant (P = 1 in both follow ups). Conclusion Using split thickness cartilage slices arranged in mosaic pattern in type I tympanoplasty successfully overcame the hindering effect of cartilage on acoustic transfer, with no fear regarding take rate or complications.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00109-6
spellingShingle Mahmoud S. Elfouly
Full thickness vs sliced mosaic cartilage graft in tympanoplasty: a comparative study
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
title Full thickness vs sliced mosaic cartilage graft in tympanoplasty: a comparative study
title_full Full thickness vs sliced mosaic cartilage graft in tympanoplasty: a comparative study
title_fullStr Full thickness vs sliced mosaic cartilage graft in tympanoplasty: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Full thickness vs sliced mosaic cartilage graft in tympanoplasty: a comparative study
title_short Full thickness vs sliced mosaic cartilage graft in tympanoplasty: a comparative study
title_sort full thickness vs sliced mosaic cartilage graft in tympanoplasty a comparative study
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-021-00109-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudselfouly fullthicknessvsslicedmosaiccartilagegraftintympanoplastyacomparativestudy