Examining Evident Interdisciplinarity Among Prides of Lion Researchers

Lions (Panthera leo) have experienced dramatic population declines in recent decades and today, inhabit just a fraction of their historic range. The reasons behind these declines are many, but conflict with humans, principally motivated by lion depredation of livestock, is among the most influential...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert A. Montgomery, Kevin C. Elliott, Matthew W. Hayward, Steven M. Gray, Joshua J. Millspaugh, Shawn J. Riley, Bernard M. Kissui, Daniel B. Kramer, Remington J. Moll, Tutilo Mudumba, Eric D. Tans, Arthur B. Muneza, Leandro Abade, Jacalyn M. Beck, Claire F. Hoffmann, Charlie R. Booher, David W. Macdonald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2018.00049/full
_version_ 1819295834679803904
author Robert A. Montgomery
Robert A. Montgomery
Kevin C. Elliott
Kevin C. Elliott
Kevin C. Elliott
Matthew W. Hayward
Matthew W. Hayward
Matthew W. Hayward
Steven M. Gray
Joshua J. Millspaugh
Shawn J. Riley
Bernard M. Kissui
Daniel B. Kramer
Daniel B. Kramer
Remington J. Moll
Tutilo Mudumba
Eric D. Tans
Arthur B. Muneza
Leandro Abade
Leandro Abade
Jacalyn M. Beck
Claire F. Hoffmann
Charlie R. Booher
David W. Macdonald
author_facet Robert A. Montgomery
Robert A. Montgomery
Kevin C. Elliott
Kevin C. Elliott
Kevin C. Elliott
Matthew W. Hayward
Matthew W. Hayward
Matthew W. Hayward
Steven M. Gray
Joshua J. Millspaugh
Shawn J. Riley
Bernard M. Kissui
Daniel B. Kramer
Daniel B. Kramer
Remington J. Moll
Tutilo Mudumba
Eric D. Tans
Arthur B. Muneza
Leandro Abade
Leandro Abade
Jacalyn M. Beck
Claire F. Hoffmann
Charlie R. Booher
David W. Macdonald
author_sort Robert A. Montgomery
collection DOAJ
description Lions (Panthera leo) have experienced dramatic population declines in recent decades and today, inhabit just a fraction of their historic range. The reasons behind these declines are many, but conflict with humans, principally motivated by lion depredation of livestock, is among the most influential. Recent calls within the scientific community have identified that wicked problems like these should be addressed using interdisciplinary approaches. Here we examined the extent to which human-lion conflict research has been interdisciplinary. We conducted an extensive review of the literature and uncovered 88 papers, published between 1990 and 2015, that assessed human-lion interaction and the ecology of lions exposed to anthropogenic disturbance. While human-lion conflict research experienced near-exponential growth (y = 8E-194e0.222x, R2 = 0.76) across this time period, the number of co-authors engaged in this research changed very little (x = 3.28, se = 0.19). Moreover, co-authors of this research tended to be affiliated with units from just three highly-related STEM disciplines (biology, wildlife management, and environmental science). Comparatively, co-authors affiliated with units in the humanities and social sciences occurred in <4% of all papers examined. Our analysis also presents a novel framework that positions human-lion conflict research as having not two dimensions, as has been commonly conceptualized, but five dimensions. These dimensions include not only the human and the lion dimensions, but also the livestock, wild prey, and environmental dimensions. None of the papers that we evaluated concurrently studied all five of these dimensions to determine their impact on human-lion conflict. Furthermore, despite the fact that human-lion conflict research was primarily developed by co-authors from STEM disciplines, the most common dimension evaluated was the human dimension which requires social science and humanities expertise. Our analysis indicates that interdisciplinarity among human-lion conflict research has historically been low. These low levels of interdisciplinarity observed from 1990 to 2015 however, are not necessarily representative of the ongoing efforts to develop more inclusive research teams. Thus, we discuss the implications of this research for the development of sustainable solutions to conserve lions and preserve human well-being and identify potential avenues forward to create more interdisciplinary prides of lion researchers.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T04:48:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-396f2acf1a6944278eee3c9d3a229958
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-701X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T04:48:31Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-396f2acf1a6944278eee3c9d3a2299582022-12-21T17:14:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2018-04-01610.3389/fevo.2018.00049347983Examining Evident Interdisciplinarity Among Prides of Lion ResearchersRobert A. Montgomery0Robert A. Montgomery1Kevin C. Elliott2Kevin C. Elliott3Kevin C. Elliott4Matthew W. Hayward5Matthew W. Hayward6Matthew W. Hayward7Steven M. Gray8Joshua J. Millspaugh9Shawn J. Riley10Bernard M. Kissui11Daniel B. Kramer12Daniel B. Kramer13Remington J. Moll14Tutilo Mudumba15Eric D. Tans16Arthur B. Muneza17Leandro Abade18Leandro Abade19Jacalyn M. Beck20Claire F. Hoffmann21Charlie R. Booher22David W. Macdonald23Research on the Ecology of Carnivores and their Prey Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesWildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomLyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesDepartment of Philosophy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaCentre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South AfricaCentre for Wildlife Management, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South AfricaResearch on the Ecology of Carnivores and their Prey Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesWildlife Biology Program, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United StatesDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States0Center for Wildlife Management Studies, The School for Field Studies, Beverly, NJ, United StatesDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States1James Madison College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesResearch on the Ecology of Carnivores and their Prey Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesResearch on the Ecology of Carnivores and their Prey Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States2Collections Management Division, Michigan State University Libraries, East Lansing, MI, United StatesResearch on the Ecology of Carnivores and their Prey Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesResearch on the Ecology of Carnivores and their Prey Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesWildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomResearch on the Ecology of Carnivores and their Prey Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesResearch on the Ecology of Carnivores and their Prey Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesResearch on the Ecology of Carnivores and their Prey Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesWildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomLions (Panthera leo) have experienced dramatic population declines in recent decades and today, inhabit just a fraction of their historic range. The reasons behind these declines are many, but conflict with humans, principally motivated by lion depredation of livestock, is among the most influential. Recent calls within the scientific community have identified that wicked problems like these should be addressed using interdisciplinary approaches. Here we examined the extent to which human-lion conflict research has been interdisciplinary. We conducted an extensive review of the literature and uncovered 88 papers, published between 1990 and 2015, that assessed human-lion interaction and the ecology of lions exposed to anthropogenic disturbance. While human-lion conflict research experienced near-exponential growth (y = 8E-194e0.222x, R2 = 0.76) across this time period, the number of co-authors engaged in this research changed very little (x = 3.28, se = 0.19). Moreover, co-authors of this research tended to be affiliated with units from just three highly-related STEM disciplines (biology, wildlife management, and environmental science). Comparatively, co-authors affiliated with units in the humanities and social sciences occurred in <4% of all papers examined. Our analysis also presents a novel framework that positions human-lion conflict research as having not two dimensions, as has been commonly conceptualized, but five dimensions. These dimensions include not only the human and the lion dimensions, but also the livestock, wild prey, and environmental dimensions. None of the papers that we evaluated concurrently studied all five of these dimensions to determine their impact on human-lion conflict. Furthermore, despite the fact that human-lion conflict research was primarily developed by co-authors from STEM disciplines, the most common dimension evaluated was the human dimension which requires social science and humanities expertise. Our analysis indicates that interdisciplinarity among human-lion conflict research has historically been low. These low levels of interdisciplinarity observed from 1990 to 2015 however, are not necessarily representative of the ongoing efforts to develop more inclusive research teams. Thus, we discuss the implications of this research for the development of sustainable solutions to conserve lions and preserve human well-being and identify potential avenues forward to create more interdisciplinary prides of lion researchers.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2018.00049/fullconservationhuman-lion conflictinterdisciplinarylionPanthera leo
spellingShingle Robert A. Montgomery
Robert A. Montgomery
Kevin C. Elliott
Kevin C. Elliott
Kevin C. Elliott
Matthew W. Hayward
Matthew W. Hayward
Matthew W. Hayward
Steven M. Gray
Joshua J. Millspaugh
Shawn J. Riley
Bernard M. Kissui
Daniel B. Kramer
Daniel B. Kramer
Remington J. Moll
Tutilo Mudumba
Eric D. Tans
Arthur B. Muneza
Leandro Abade
Leandro Abade
Jacalyn M. Beck
Claire F. Hoffmann
Charlie R. Booher
David W. Macdonald
Examining Evident Interdisciplinarity Among Prides of Lion Researchers
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
conservation
human-lion conflict
interdisciplinary
lion
Panthera leo
title Examining Evident Interdisciplinarity Among Prides of Lion Researchers
title_full Examining Evident Interdisciplinarity Among Prides of Lion Researchers
title_fullStr Examining Evident Interdisciplinarity Among Prides of Lion Researchers
title_full_unstemmed Examining Evident Interdisciplinarity Among Prides of Lion Researchers
title_short Examining Evident Interdisciplinarity Among Prides of Lion Researchers
title_sort examining evident interdisciplinarity among prides of lion researchers
topic conservation
human-lion conflict
interdisciplinary
lion
Panthera leo
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2018.00049/full
work_keys_str_mv AT robertamontgomery examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT robertamontgomery examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT kevincelliott examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT kevincelliott examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT kevincelliott examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT matthewwhayward examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT matthewwhayward examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT matthewwhayward examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT stevenmgray examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT joshuajmillspaugh examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT shawnjriley examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT bernardmkissui examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT danielbkramer examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT danielbkramer examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT remingtonjmoll examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT tutilomudumba examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT ericdtans examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT arthurbmuneza examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT leandroabade examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT leandroabade examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT jacalynmbeck examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT clairefhoffmann examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT charlierbooher examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers
AT davidwmacdonald examiningevidentinterdisciplinarityamongpridesoflionresearchers