Are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction? Text-based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non-majors introductory biology course

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a reimagining of many aspects of higher education, including how instructors interact with their students and how they encourage student participation. Text-based chatting during synchronous remote instruction is a simple form of student-st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachael D. Robnett, Cissy J. Ballen, Sheritta Fagbodun, Kelly Lane, Sophie J. McCoy, Lecia Robinson, Ebony I. Weems, Sehoya Cotner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581347/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1797990783720095744
author Rachael D. Robnett
Cissy J. Ballen
Sheritta Fagbodun
Kelly Lane
Sophie J. McCoy
Lecia Robinson
Ebony I. Weems
Sehoya Cotner
author_facet Rachael D. Robnett
Cissy J. Ballen
Sheritta Fagbodun
Kelly Lane
Sophie J. McCoy
Lecia Robinson
Ebony I. Weems
Sehoya Cotner
author_sort Rachael D. Robnett
collection DOAJ
description The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a reimagining of many aspects of higher education, including how instructors interact with their students and how they encourage student participation. Text-based chatting during synchronous remote instruction is a simple form of student-student and student-instructor interaction. The importance of student participation has been documented, as have clear disparities in participation between those well-represented and those under-represented in science disciplines. Thus, we conducted an investigation into who is texting, what students are texting, and how these texts align with course content. We focused on two sections of a large-enrollment, introductory biology class offered remotely during Fall 2020. Using an analysis of in-class chatting, in combination with student survey responses, we find that text-based chatting suggests not only a high level of student engagement, but a type of participation that is disproportionately favored by women. Given the multiple lines of evidence indicating that women typically under-participate in their science courses, any vehicle that counters this trend merits further exploration. We conclude with suggestions for further research, and ideas for carrying forward text-based chatting in the post-COVID-19, in-person classroom.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T08:40:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-39786d6613384226bb4939f3acdefe44
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T08:40:48Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-39786d6613384226bb4939f3acdefe442022-12-22T04:34:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011710Are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction? Text-based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non-majors introductory biology courseRachael D. RobnettCissy J. BallenSheritta FagbodunKelly LaneSophie J. McCoyLecia RobinsonEbony I. WeemsSehoya CotnerThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a reimagining of many aspects of higher education, including how instructors interact with their students and how they encourage student participation. Text-based chatting during synchronous remote instruction is a simple form of student-student and student-instructor interaction. The importance of student participation has been documented, as have clear disparities in participation between those well-represented and those under-represented in science disciplines. Thus, we conducted an investigation into who is texting, what students are texting, and how these texts align with course content. We focused on two sections of a large-enrollment, introductory biology class offered remotely during Fall 2020. Using an analysis of in-class chatting, in combination with student survey responses, we find that text-based chatting suggests not only a high level of student engagement, but a type of participation that is disproportionately favored by women. Given the multiple lines of evidence indicating that women typically under-participate in their science courses, any vehicle that counters this trend merits further exploration. We conclude with suggestions for further research, and ideas for carrying forward text-based chatting in the post-COVID-19, in-person classroom.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581347/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Rachael D. Robnett
Cissy J. Ballen
Sheritta Fagbodun
Kelly Lane
Sophie J. McCoy
Lecia Robinson
Ebony I. Weems
Sehoya Cotner
Are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction? Text-based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non-majors introductory biology course
PLoS ONE
title Are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction? Text-based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non-majors introductory biology course
title_full Are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction? Text-based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non-majors introductory biology course
title_fullStr Are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction? Text-based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non-majors introductory biology course
title_full_unstemmed Are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction? Text-based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non-majors introductory biology course
title_short Are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction? Text-based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non-majors introductory biology course
title_sort are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction text based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non majors introductory biology course
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581347/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT rachaeldrobnett aresynchronouschatsasilverliningofemergencyremoteinstructiontextbasedchattingisdisproportionatelyfavoredbywomeninanonmajorsintroductorybiologycourse
AT cissyjballen aresynchronouschatsasilverliningofemergencyremoteinstructiontextbasedchattingisdisproportionatelyfavoredbywomeninanonmajorsintroductorybiologycourse
AT sherittafagbodun aresynchronouschatsasilverliningofemergencyremoteinstructiontextbasedchattingisdisproportionatelyfavoredbywomeninanonmajorsintroductorybiologycourse
AT kellylane aresynchronouschatsasilverliningofemergencyremoteinstructiontextbasedchattingisdisproportionatelyfavoredbywomeninanonmajorsintroductorybiologycourse
AT sophiejmccoy aresynchronouschatsasilverliningofemergencyremoteinstructiontextbasedchattingisdisproportionatelyfavoredbywomeninanonmajorsintroductorybiologycourse
AT leciarobinson aresynchronouschatsasilverliningofemergencyremoteinstructiontextbasedchattingisdisproportionatelyfavoredbywomeninanonmajorsintroductorybiologycourse
AT ebonyiweems aresynchronouschatsasilverliningofemergencyremoteinstructiontextbasedchattingisdisproportionatelyfavoredbywomeninanonmajorsintroductorybiologycourse
AT sehoyacotner aresynchronouschatsasilverliningofemergencyremoteinstructiontextbasedchattingisdisproportionatelyfavoredbywomeninanonmajorsintroductorybiologycourse