Quantitative Evaluation of Fundus Autofluorescence in Laser Photocoagulation Scars for Diabetic Retinopathy: Conventional vs. Short-Pulse Laser

Short-pulse laser is popular for its advantages like less pain. However, its effectiveness is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare fundus autofluorescence (FAF) luminosity changes of laser photocoagulation scars between the conventional laser (0.2 s) and the short-pulse laser (0.02 s)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Toshiya Kimura, Shuntaro Ogura, Tsutomu Yasukawa, Miho Nozaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:Life
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/13/9/1901
_version_ 1797579152727998464
author Toshiya Kimura
Shuntaro Ogura
Tsutomu Yasukawa
Miho Nozaki
author_facet Toshiya Kimura
Shuntaro Ogura
Tsutomu Yasukawa
Miho Nozaki
author_sort Toshiya Kimura
collection DOAJ
description Short-pulse laser is popular for its advantages like less pain. However, its effectiveness is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare fundus autofluorescence (FAF) luminosity changes of laser photocoagulation scars between the conventional laser (0.2 s) and the short-pulse laser (0.02 s) for diabetic retinopathy. Conventional and short-pulse laser photocoagulations were performed in six and seven eyes, respectively. FAF images were captured at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after the treatments. To evaluate FAF, individual gray-scale values of the laser scars adjacent to the retinal arcade vessels were recorded; then, the mean gray values of the scars were divided by the luminosity of arcade vein. The average luminosity ratio of laser scars at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months were 1.51 ± 0.17, 1.26 ± 0.07, 1.21 ± 0.03, 0.95 ± 0.11, and 0.89 ± 0.05 with conventional laser and 1.91 ± 0.13, 1.50 ± 0.15, 1.26 ± 0.08, 1.18 ± 0.06, and 0.97 ± 0.04 with short-pulse laser, respectively. Findings suggest the short-pulse laser displayed delayed hypoautofluorescence progression. This implies potential postponement in post-irradiation atrophic changes, as well as metabolic amelioration delay in the ischemic retina, when compared to conventional laser treatment.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:31:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3995819ab1ad48419f96435c5b720391
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-1729
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:31:51Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Life
spelling doaj.art-3995819ab1ad48419f96435c5b7203912023-11-19T11:37:52ZengMDPI AGLife2075-17292023-09-01139190110.3390/life13091901Quantitative Evaluation of Fundus Autofluorescence in Laser Photocoagulation Scars for Diabetic Retinopathy: Conventional vs. Short-Pulse LaserToshiya Kimura0Shuntaro Ogura1Tsutomu Yasukawa2Miho Nozaki3Department of Ophthalmology, Laser Eye Center, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, Nagoya 464-8547, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Laser Eye Center, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, Nagoya 464-8547, JapanShort-pulse laser is popular for its advantages like less pain. However, its effectiveness is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare fundus autofluorescence (FAF) luminosity changes of laser photocoagulation scars between the conventional laser (0.2 s) and the short-pulse laser (0.02 s) for diabetic retinopathy. Conventional and short-pulse laser photocoagulations were performed in six and seven eyes, respectively. FAF images were captured at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after the treatments. To evaluate FAF, individual gray-scale values of the laser scars adjacent to the retinal arcade vessels were recorded; then, the mean gray values of the scars were divided by the luminosity of arcade vein. The average luminosity ratio of laser scars at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months were 1.51 ± 0.17, 1.26 ± 0.07, 1.21 ± 0.03, 0.95 ± 0.11, and 0.89 ± 0.05 with conventional laser and 1.91 ± 0.13, 1.50 ± 0.15, 1.26 ± 0.08, 1.18 ± 0.06, and 0.97 ± 0.04 with short-pulse laser, respectively. Findings suggest the short-pulse laser displayed delayed hypoautofluorescence progression. This implies potential postponement in post-irradiation atrophic changes, as well as metabolic amelioration delay in the ischemic retina, when compared to conventional laser treatment.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/13/9/1901diabetic retinopathypanretinal photocoagulationconventional lasershort-pulse laserfundus autofluorescencehypoautofluorescence
spellingShingle Toshiya Kimura
Shuntaro Ogura
Tsutomu Yasukawa
Miho Nozaki
Quantitative Evaluation of Fundus Autofluorescence in Laser Photocoagulation Scars for Diabetic Retinopathy: Conventional vs. Short-Pulse Laser
Life
diabetic retinopathy
panretinal photocoagulation
conventional laser
short-pulse laser
fundus autofluorescence
hypoautofluorescence
title Quantitative Evaluation of Fundus Autofluorescence in Laser Photocoagulation Scars for Diabetic Retinopathy: Conventional vs. Short-Pulse Laser
title_full Quantitative Evaluation of Fundus Autofluorescence in Laser Photocoagulation Scars for Diabetic Retinopathy: Conventional vs. Short-Pulse Laser
title_fullStr Quantitative Evaluation of Fundus Autofluorescence in Laser Photocoagulation Scars for Diabetic Retinopathy: Conventional vs. Short-Pulse Laser
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Evaluation of Fundus Autofluorescence in Laser Photocoagulation Scars for Diabetic Retinopathy: Conventional vs. Short-Pulse Laser
title_short Quantitative Evaluation of Fundus Autofluorescence in Laser Photocoagulation Scars for Diabetic Retinopathy: Conventional vs. Short-Pulse Laser
title_sort quantitative evaluation of fundus autofluorescence in laser photocoagulation scars for diabetic retinopathy conventional vs short pulse laser
topic diabetic retinopathy
panretinal photocoagulation
conventional laser
short-pulse laser
fundus autofluorescence
hypoautofluorescence
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/13/9/1901
work_keys_str_mv AT toshiyakimura quantitativeevaluationoffundusautofluorescenceinlaserphotocoagulationscarsfordiabeticretinopathyconventionalvsshortpulselaser
AT shuntaroogura quantitativeevaluationoffundusautofluorescenceinlaserphotocoagulationscarsfordiabeticretinopathyconventionalvsshortpulselaser
AT tsutomuyasukawa quantitativeevaluationoffundusautofluorescenceinlaserphotocoagulationscarsfordiabeticretinopathyconventionalvsshortpulselaser
AT mihonozaki quantitativeevaluationoffundusautofluorescenceinlaserphotocoagulationscarsfordiabeticretinopathyconventionalvsshortpulselaser