Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bartosz W. Wojciechowski, Emmanuel M. Pothos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02281/full
_version_ 1811301235840516096
author Bartosz W. Wojciechowski
Emmanuel M. Pothos
author_facet Bartosz W. Wojciechowski
Emmanuel M. Pothos
author_sort Bartosz W. Wojciechowski
collection DOAJ
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:05:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-399d259cd1b641c19fa0450260b97f67
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:05:16Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-399d259cd1b641c19fa0450260b97f672022-12-22T02:57:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-11-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.02281432659Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?Bartosz W. Wojciechowski0Emmanuel M. Pothos1Department of Clinical and Forensic Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia of Katowice, Katowice, PolandDepartment of Psychology, City, University of London, London, United Kingdomhttps://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02281/fullconjunction fallacylegal decision makingquantum cognitionquantum probability theorylegal psychology
spellingShingle Bartosz W. Wojciechowski
Emmanuel M. Pothos
Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
Frontiers in Psychology
conjunction fallacy
legal decision making
quantum cognition
quantum probability theory
legal psychology
title Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
title_full Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
title_fullStr Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
title_full_unstemmed Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
title_short Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
title_sort corrigendum is there a conjunction fallacy in legal probabilistic decision making
topic conjunction fallacy
legal decision making
quantum cognition
quantum probability theory
legal psychology
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02281/full
work_keys_str_mv AT bartoszwwojciechowski corrigendumisthereaconjunctionfallacyinlegalprobabilisticdecisionmaking
AT emmanuelmpothos corrigendumisthereaconjunctionfallacyinlegalprobabilisticdecisionmaking