A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy

PURPOSE: To compare hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy techniques in live donor nephrectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included all patients submitted to hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure laparoscopic live dono...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anibal Wood Branco, William Kondo, Alcides José Branco Filho, Marco Aurélio de George, Marlon Rangel, Luciano Carneiro Stunitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier España 2008-01-01
Series:Clinics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322008000600015
_version_ 1818237307300347904
author Anibal Wood Branco
William Kondo
Alcides José Branco Filho
Marco Aurélio de George
Marlon Rangel
Luciano Carneiro Stunitz
author_facet Anibal Wood Branco
William Kondo
Alcides José Branco Filho
Marco Aurélio de George
Marlon Rangel
Luciano Carneiro Stunitz
author_sort Anibal Wood Branco
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSE: To compare hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy techniques in live donor nephrectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included all patients submitted to hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy between May 2002 and December 2007. The operative data and post-operative courses were reviewed. Information was collected on the operative time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, intra-operative complications, time to first oral intake, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications. The data were analyzed using Student's t -tests and Fisher exact tests as appropriate, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: The means of the operative duration, warm ischemia time and intra-operative bleeding were 83 min, 3.6 min and 130.9 cc, respectively, for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, and 78.4 min, 2.5 min and 98.9 cc, respectively, for pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (p=0.29, p<0.0001 and p=0.08, respectively). Intra-operative complications occurred in 6% of patients submitted to hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and in 4.5% of those submitted to pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (p=0.68). Only one patient from each group required conversion to open surgery; one person receiving hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy had bleeding and one person receiving pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy had low carbon dioxide levels during the warm ischemia period. Compared with patients receiving hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, patients submitted to pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy were able to take their first meal earlier (12.5 vs. 9.2 hours, p=0.046), were discharged home sooner (2.8 vs. 1.4 days, p<0.0001) and had fewer post-operative complications (7.5% vs. 0.6%, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy had some advantages over hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in terms of the warm ischemia time, time to first oral intake, length of hospital stay, and post-operative donor complications.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T12:23:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-399f44c44a4f47f5a8cbe459e6df5886
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1807-5932
1980-5322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T12:23:41Z
publishDate 2008-01-01
publisher Elsevier España
record_format Article
series Clinics
spelling doaj.art-399f44c44a4f47f5a8cbe459e6df58862022-12-22T00:24:35ZengElsevier EspañaClinics1807-59321980-53222008-01-0163679580010.1590/S1807-59322008000600015A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomyAnibal Wood BrancoWilliam KondoAlcides José Branco FilhoMarco Aurélio de GeorgeMarlon RangelLuciano Carneiro StunitzPURPOSE: To compare hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy techniques in live donor nephrectomy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included all patients submitted to hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy between May 2002 and December 2007. The operative data and post-operative courses were reviewed. Information was collected on the operative time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, intra-operative complications, time to first oral intake, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications. The data were analyzed using Student's t -tests and Fisher exact tests as appropriate, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: The means of the operative duration, warm ischemia time and intra-operative bleeding were 83 min, 3.6 min and 130.9 cc, respectively, for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, and 78.4 min, 2.5 min and 98.9 cc, respectively, for pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (p=0.29, p<0.0001 and p=0.08, respectively). Intra-operative complications occurred in 6% of patients submitted to hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and in 4.5% of those submitted to pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (p=0.68). Only one patient from each group required conversion to open surgery; one person receiving hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy had bleeding and one person receiving pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy had low carbon dioxide levels during the warm ischemia period. Compared with patients receiving hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, patients submitted to pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy were able to take their first meal earlier (12.5 vs. 9.2 hours, p=0.046), were discharged home sooner (2.8 vs. 1.4 days, p<0.0001) and had fewer post-operative complications (7.5% vs. 0.6%, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy had some advantages over hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in terms of the warm ischemia time, time to first oral intake, length of hospital stay, and post-operative donor complications.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322008000600015LaparoscopyNephrectomyKidney transplantationLiving donorHand-assisted
spellingShingle Anibal Wood Branco
William Kondo
Alcides José Branco Filho
Marco Aurélio de George
Marlon Rangel
Luciano Carneiro Stunitz
A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy
Clinics
Laparoscopy
Nephrectomy
Kidney transplantation
Living donor
Hand-assisted
title A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy
title_full A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy
title_fullStr A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy
title_short A comparison of hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy
title_sort comparison of hand assisted and pure laparoscopic techniques in live donor nephrectomy
topic Laparoscopy
Nephrectomy
Kidney transplantation
Living donor
Hand-assisted
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322008000600015
work_keys_str_mv AT anibalwoodbranco acomparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT williamkondo acomparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT alcidesjosebrancofilho acomparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT marcoaureliodegeorge acomparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT marlonrangel acomparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT lucianocarneirostunitz acomparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT anibalwoodbranco comparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT williamkondo comparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT alcidesjosebrancofilho comparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT marcoaureliodegeorge comparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT marlonrangel comparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy
AT lucianocarneirostunitz comparisonofhandassistedandpurelaparoscopictechniquesinlivedonornephrectomy