Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Frequency of Antibiotic-Resistant <i>Clostridium</i> Species in Saudi Arabia

<i>Clostridium</i> is a genus comprising Gram-positive, rod-shaped, spore-forming, anaerobic bacteria that cause a variety of diseases. However, there is a shortage of information regarding antibiotic resistance in the genus in Saudi Arabia. This comprehensive analysis of research result...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saeed S. Banawas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Antibiotics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/9/1165
Description
Summary:<i>Clostridium</i> is a genus comprising Gram-positive, rod-shaped, spore-forming, anaerobic bacteria that cause a variety of diseases. However, there is a shortage of information regarding antibiotic resistance in the genus in Saudi Arabia. This comprehensive analysis of research results published up until December 2021 intends to highlight the incidence of antibiotic resistance in <i>Clostridium</i> species in Saudi Arabia. PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, SDL, and ScienceDirect databases were searched using specific keywords, and ten publications on antibiotic resistance in <i>Clostridium</i> species in Saudi Arabia were identified. We found that the rates of resistance of <i>Clostridium difficile</i> to antibiotics were as follows: 42% for ciprofloxacin, 83% for gentamicin, 28% for clindamycin, 25% for penicillin, 100% for levofloxacin, 24% for tetracycline, 77% for nalidixic acid, 50% for erythromycin, 72% for ampicillin, and 28% for moxifloxacin; whereas those of <i>C. perfringens</i> were: 21% for metronidazole, 83% for ceftiofur, 39% for clindamycin, 59% for penicillin, 62% for erythromycin, 47% for oxytetracycline, and 47% for lincomycin. The current findings suggest that ceftiofur, erythromycin, lincomycin, and oxytetracycline should not be used in <i>C. perfringens</i> infection treatments in humans or animals in Saudi Arabia.
ISSN:2079-6382