The experience of self-sufficiency in mysticism of the twentieth century
Mysticism is a religious practice, and philosophical mysticism is a reflection on this practice. They distinguish between theistic mysticism as classical, where the absolute is a personal God, and non-theistic as non-classical, where the personal God is replaced by an impersonal transcendental begin...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Ukrainian Association of Researchers of Religion (UARR)
2003-11-01
|
| Series: | Українське Pелігієзнавство |
| Online Access: | https://uars.info/index.php/uars/article/view/1472 |
| _version_ | 1818128589796671488 |
|---|---|
| author | Mykhailo G. Murashkin |
| author_facet | Mykhailo G. Murashkin |
| author_sort | Mykhailo G. Murashkin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Mysticism is a religious practice, and philosophical mysticism is a reflection on this practice. They distinguish between theistic mysticism as classical, where the absolute is a personal God, and non-theistic as non-classical, where the personal God is replaced by an impersonal transcendental beginning, such as "Tao" in Taoism, "Shunyata" in Buddhism, or "One" in Neo-Platonism. Both classical (theistic) and non-classical (non-theistic) mysticism suggest the need for mystical practice. But in the second half of the twentieth century, post-theistic mysticism arises, which completely rejects mystical practice and is considered post-classical. The emergence of post-non-classical mysticism in the twentieth century coincides with the emergence of the post-non-classical direction in the general culture, that is, with postmodernism. Both classical, non-classical and post-classical mysticism describe the characteristics of a person's state of self-sufficiency. Only the philosophical mysticism of the classical and non-classical directions connects the emergence of this state of self-sufficiency in the mystic with its practice, and the post-non-classical direction denies this practice. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T07:35:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-39d5981eae7d46b582c2688ccd4eac28 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2306-3548 2617-9792 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T07:35:39Z |
| publishDate | 2003-11-01 |
| publisher | Ukrainian Association of Researchers of Religion (UARR) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Українське Pелігієзнавство |
| spelling | doaj.art-39d5981eae7d46b582c2688ccd4eac282022-12-22T01:15:42ZrusUkrainian Association of Researchers of Religion (UARR)Українське Pелігієзнавство2306-35482617-97922003-11-0127-2810.32420/2003.27-28.1472The experience of self-sufficiency in mysticism of the twentieth centuryMykhailo G. MurashkinMysticism is a religious practice, and philosophical mysticism is a reflection on this practice. They distinguish between theistic mysticism as classical, where the absolute is a personal God, and non-theistic as non-classical, where the personal God is replaced by an impersonal transcendental beginning, such as "Tao" in Taoism, "Shunyata" in Buddhism, or "One" in Neo-Platonism. Both classical (theistic) and non-classical (non-theistic) mysticism suggest the need for mystical practice. But in the second half of the twentieth century, post-theistic mysticism arises, which completely rejects mystical practice and is considered post-classical. The emergence of post-non-classical mysticism in the twentieth century coincides with the emergence of the post-non-classical direction in the general culture, that is, with postmodernism. Both classical, non-classical and post-classical mysticism describe the characteristics of a person's state of self-sufficiency. Only the philosophical mysticism of the classical and non-classical directions connects the emergence of this state of self-sufficiency in the mystic with its practice, and the post-non-classical direction denies this practice.https://uars.info/index.php/uars/article/view/1472 |
| spellingShingle | Mykhailo G. Murashkin The experience of self-sufficiency in mysticism of the twentieth century Українське Pелігієзнавство |
| title | The experience of self-sufficiency in mysticism of the twentieth century |
| title_full | The experience of self-sufficiency in mysticism of the twentieth century |
| title_fullStr | The experience of self-sufficiency in mysticism of the twentieth century |
| title_full_unstemmed | The experience of self-sufficiency in mysticism of the twentieth century |
| title_short | The experience of self-sufficiency in mysticism of the twentieth century |
| title_sort | experience of self sufficiency in mysticism of the twentieth century |
| url | https://uars.info/index.php/uars/article/view/1472 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mykhailogmurashkin theexperienceofselfsufficiencyinmysticismofthetwentiethcentury AT mykhailogmurashkin experienceofselfsufficiencyinmysticismofthetwentiethcentury |