Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing symptoms after surgery performed under general anaesthesia. 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonists are routinely used for prevention and treatment of PONV. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of QTc prolongation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashish Ganjare, Atul P Kulkarni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=1;spage=41;epage=45;aulast=Ganjare
_version_ 1819259447069900800
author Ashish Ganjare
Atul P Kulkarni
author_facet Ashish Ganjare
Atul P Kulkarni
author_sort Ashish Ganjare
collection DOAJ
description Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing symptoms after surgery performed under general anaesthesia. 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonists are routinely used for prevention and treatment of PONV. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of QTc prolongation and quantify the amount of QTc prolongation with ondansetron and granisetron. Methods: This prospective, randomised, single-blind study was carried out in the OT and Recovery Room (RR) of a tertiary referral cancer centre. After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent from the patients, 70 patients undergoing elective surgery for carcinoma breast were included. In the RR, patients randomly received 8 mg of ondansetron or 1 mg of granisetron intravenously. Serial ECGs were recorded at various intervals, Non-invasive blood pressure and SpO 2 were also recorded. Chi-square test and Mann-Whiteny test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The demographics were similar in both groups. The incidence of significant QTc prolongation was significantly higher in the ondansetron group (22 of 37 (59.4%) vs. 11 of 33 patients (33.33%) ( P<0.05)). There was an increase in the QTc interval in both the groups as compared to the baseline. The median prolongation in QTc interval from baseline was much more in the ondansetron group; this was statistically significant only at 5 and 15 min. Conclusion: Granisetron may be a safer option than ondanasetron for prevention and treatment of PONV due to lesser prolongation QTc interval. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01352130)
first_indexed 2024-12-23T19:10:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-39d9770669f7405ba512d250281f92de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0019-5049
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T19:10:09Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-39d9770669f7405ba512d250281f92de2022-12-21T17:34:29ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50492013-01-01571414510.4103/0019-5049.108560Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trialAshish GanjareAtul P KulkarniBackground: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and distressing symptoms after surgery performed under general anaesthesia. 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonists are routinely used for prevention and treatment of PONV. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of QTc prolongation and quantify the amount of QTc prolongation with ondansetron and granisetron. Methods: This prospective, randomised, single-blind study was carried out in the OT and Recovery Room (RR) of a tertiary referral cancer centre. After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent from the patients, 70 patients undergoing elective surgery for carcinoma breast were included. In the RR, patients randomly received 8 mg of ondansetron or 1 mg of granisetron intravenously. Serial ECGs were recorded at various intervals, Non-invasive blood pressure and SpO 2 were also recorded. Chi-square test and Mann-Whiteny test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The demographics were similar in both groups. The incidence of significant QTc prolongation was significantly higher in the ondansetron group (22 of 37 (59.4%) vs. 11 of 33 patients (33.33%) ( P<0.05)). There was an increase in the QTc interval in both the groups as compared to the baseline. The median prolongation in QTc interval from baseline was much more in the ondansetron group; this was statistically significant only at 5 and 15 min. Conclusion: Granisetron may be a safer option than ondanasetron for prevention and treatment of PONV due to lesser prolongation QTc interval. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01352130)http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=1;spage=41;epage=45;aulast=Ganjare5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonistsgranisteronondansetronpostoperative nausea and vomitingQTc interval
spellingShingle Ashish Ganjare
Atul P Kulkarni
Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonists
granisteron
ondansetron
postoperative nausea and vomiting
QTc interval
title Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title_full Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title_fullStr Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title_short Comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast: A prospective single-blind randomised trial
title_sort comparative electrocardiographic effects of intravenous ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma breast a prospective single blind randomised trial
topic 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonists
granisteron
ondansetron
postoperative nausea and vomiting
QTc interval
url http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2013;volume=57;issue=1;spage=41;epage=45;aulast=Ganjare
work_keys_str_mv AT ashishganjare comparativeelectrocardiographiceffectsofintravenousondansetronandgranisetroninpatientsundergoingsurgeryforcarcinomabreastaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedtrial
AT atulpkulkarni comparativeelectrocardiographiceffectsofintravenousondansetronandgranisetroninpatientsundergoingsurgeryforcarcinomabreastaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedtrial