Evaluation of periodontal status adjacent to interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfaces

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the periodontal status of interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfaces. Methods: In 65 patients, we analyzed 145 restored surfaces and 145 non-restored surfaces. Results: Most of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elvia Christina Barros de Almeida, Estela Santos Gusmão, Ana Cláudia da Silva Araújo, Fernanda Cristina Barros, Bruna de Carvalho Farias, Renata Cimões
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic 2008-01-01
Series:RGO: Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistargo.com.br/include/getdoc.php?id=2569&article=924&mode=pdf
_version_ 1818517625369526272
author Elvia Christina Barros de Almeida
Estela Santos Gusmão
Ana Cláudia da Silva Araújo
Fernanda Cristina Barros
Bruna de Carvalho Farias
Renata Cimões
author_facet Elvia Christina Barros de Almeida
Estela Santos Gusmão
Ana Cláudia da Silva Araújo
Fernanda Cristina Barros
Bruna de Carvalho Farias
Renata Cimões
author_sort Elvia Christina Barros de Almeida
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the periodontal status of interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfaces. Methods: In 65 patients, we analyzed 145 restored surfaces and 145 non-restored surfaces. Results: Most of the restored surfaces (54.3%) showed radiographic alterations, which was shown to be higher among restorations with clinically detected proximal excess (56.8% x 52.8%); with lack of restorative material (64.5% x 51.4%); in restorations with proximal overhang (67.7% x 44.4%); in teeth with gingival inflammation?/bleeding (55.1% x 40.0%) and in teeth with probing depth exceeding 3 mm (64.3% x 52.9%). However, there were no significant associations for these variables. Of the non-restored surfaces, 24.4% showed radiographic alterations, however there were no significant associations. Conclusion: The results showed a statistical significance for radiographic alterations in restored and non-restored surfaces.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T00:58:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-39e44120315e4059a1e920403a8c1f51
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0103-6971
1981-8637
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T00:58:42Z
publishDate 2008-01-01
publisher Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic
record_format Article
series RGO: Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia
spelling doaj.art-39e44120315e4059a1e920403a8c1f512022-12-22T01:26:24ZengFaculdade São Leopoldo MandicRGO: Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia0103-69711981-86372008-01-01563245251Evaluation of periodontal status adjacent to interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfacesElvia Christina Barros de AlmeidaEstela Santos GusmãoAna Cláudia da Silva AraújoFernanda Cristina BarrosBruna de Carvalho FariasRenata CimõesObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the periodontal status of interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfaces. Methods: In 65 patients, we analyzed 145 restored surfaces and 145 non-restored surfaces. Results: Most of the restored surfaces (54.3%) showed radiographic alterations, which was shown to be higher among restorations with clinically detected proximal excess (56.8% x 52.8%); with lack of restorative material (64.5% x 51.4%); in restorations with proximal overhang (67.7% x 44.4%); in teeth with gingival inflammation?/bleeding (55.1% x 40.0%) and in teeth with probing depth exceeding 3 mm (64.3% x 52.9%). However, there were no significant associations for these variables. Of the non-restored surfaces, 24.4% showed radiographic alterations, however there were no significant associations. Conclusion: The results showed a statistical significance for radiographic alterations in restored and non-restored surfaces.http://www.revistargo.com.br/include/getdoc.php?id=2569&article=924&mode=pdfresinasperiodontoradiografia interproximalresinperiodontiumradiography bitewing
spellingShingle Elvia Christina Barros de Almeida
Estela Santos Gusmão
Ana Cláudia da Silva Araújo
Fernanda Cristina Barros
Bruna de Carvalho Farias
Renata Cimões
Evaluation of periodontal status adjacent to interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfaces
RGO: Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia
resinas
periodonto
radiografia interproximal
resin
periodontium
radiography bitewing
title Evaluation of periodontal status adjacent to interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfaces
title_full Evaluation of periodontal status adjacent to interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfaces
title_fullStr Evaluation of periodontal status adjacent to interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of periodontal status adjacent to interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfaces
title_short Evaluation of periodontal status adjacent to interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin, in comparison with non-restored interproximal surfaces
title_sort evaluation of periodontal status adjacent to interproximal surfaces restored with composite resin in comparison with non restored interproximal surfaces
topic resinas
periodonto
radiografia interproximal
resin
periodontium
radiography bitewing
url http://www.revistargo.com.br/include/getdoc.php?id=2569&article=924&mode=pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT elviachristinabarrosdealmeida evaluationofperiodontalstatusadjacenttointerproximalsurfacesrestoredwithcompositeresinincomparisonwithnonrestoredinterproximalsurfaces
AT estelasantosgusmao evaluationofperiodontalstatusadjacenttointerproximalsurfacesrestoredwithcompositeresinincomparisonwithnonrestoredinterproximalsurfaces
AT anaclaudiadasilvaaraujo evaluationofperiodontalstatusadjacenttointerproximalsurfacesrestoredwithcompositeresinincomparisonwithnonrestoredinterproximalsurfaces
AT fernandacristinabarros evaluationofperiodontalstatusadjacenttointerproximalsurfacesrestoredwithcompositeresinincomparisonwithnonrestoredinterproximalsurfaces
AT brunadecarvalhofarias evaluationofperiodontalstatusadjacenttointerproximalsurfacesrestoredwithcompositeresinincomparisonwithnonrestoredinterproximalsurfaces
AT renatacimoes evaluationofperiodontalstatusadjacenttointerproximalsurfacesrestoredwithcompositeresinincomparisonwithnonrestoredinterproximalsurfaces