Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs

The study examined the growth performance of pigs offered liquid feed or dry feed on either a restricted or an ad libitum basis, and whether their growth performance was further influenced by the water-to-feed ratio. The study was split into two parts to enable unrestricted (trial 1; n = 64) and res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Hurst, L. Clarke, I.J. Lean
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2008-01-01
Series:Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175173110800253X
_version_ 1798032817720918016
author D. Hurst
L. Clarke
I.J. Lean
author_facet D. Hurst
L. Clarke
I.J. Lean
author_sort D. Hurst
collection DOAJ
description The study examined the growth performance of pigs offered liquid feed or dry feed on either a restricted or an ad libitum basis, and whether their growth performance was further influenced by the water-to-feed ratio. The study was split into two parts to enable unrestricted (trial 1; n = 64) and restricted (trial 2; n = 48) feeding to be compared. Male pigs were randomly allocated to six dietary treatment groups. A standard dry pellets diet (D) was offered either as: (i) unrestricted ration (UR); (ii) restricted ration (R); or D soaked in water at a feed-to-water ratio of (iii) 1 : 1.5 restricted (1 : 1.5 R); (iv) 1 : 3 unrestricted (1 : 3 UR); (v) 1 : 3 restricted (1 : 3 R); or (vi) 1 : 3 restricted with the addition of lactic acid to adjust the feed to pH 4 (1 : 3(4) R). Liquid feeding improved (P < 0.05) average daily live-weight gain (ADG) and lean tissue growth rate (LTGR) in the 1 : 3 UR compared with DUR but did not alter feed conversion ratio (FCR). Within the R groups, ADG were greater in all of the 1 : 3 diets, whereas feed intake, and hence FCR, was lower (P < 0.001) in these groups when offered the R ration. In conclusion, liquid feeding has a beneficial influence on the performance of modern porcine genotypes during the growth/finishing phase and this is further modulated by the water-to-feed ratio.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:19:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a06147b93a8499f994ae2f0532e951b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1751-7311
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:19:03Z
publishDate 2008-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Animal
spelling doaj.art-3a06147b93a8499f994ae2f0532e951b2022-12-22T04:04:52ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112008-01-012912971302Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigsD. Hurst0L. Clarke1I.J. Lean2Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London (Wye Campus) Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UKFaculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London (Wye Campus) Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UKFaculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London (Wye Campus) Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UKThe study examined the growth performance of pigs offered liquid feed or dry feed on either a restricted or an ad libitum basis, and whether their growth performance was further influenced by the water-to-feed ratio. The study was split into two parts to enable unrestricted (trial 1; n = 64) and restricted (trial 2; n = 48) feeding to be compared. Male pigs were randomly allocated to six dietary treatment groups. A standard dry pellets diet (D) was offered either as: (i) unrestricted ration (UR); (ii) restricted ration (R); or D soaked in water at a feed-to-water ratio of (iii) 1 : 1.5 restricted (1 : 1.5 R); (iv) 1 : 3 unrestricted (1 : 3 UR); (v) 1 : 3 restricted (1 : 3 R); or (vi) 1 : 3 restricted with the addition of lactic acid to adjust the feed to pH 4 (1 : 3(4) R). Liquid feeding improved (P < 0.05) average daily live-weight gain (ADG) and lean tissue growth rate (LTGR) in the 1 : 3 UR compared with DUR but did not alter feed conversion ratio (FCR). Within the R groups, ADG were greater in all of the 1 : 3 diets, whereas feed intake, and hence FCR, was lower (P < 0.001) in these groups when offered the R ration. In conclusion, liquid feeding has a beneficial influence on the performance of modern porcine genotypes during the growth/finishing phase and this is further modulated by the water-to-feed ratio.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175173110800253Xgrowth performanceliquid feedingpigs
spellingShingle D. Hurst
L. Clarke
I.J. Lean
Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs
Animal
growth performance
liquid feeding
pigs
title Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs
title_full Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs
title_fullStr Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs
title_full_unstemmed Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs
title_short Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs
title_sort effect of liquid feeding at different water to feed ratios on the growth performance of growing finishing pigs
topic growth performance
liquid feeding
pigs
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175173110800253X
work_keys_str_mv AT dhurst effectofliquidfeedingatdifferentwatertofeedratiosonthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigs
AT lclarke effectofliquidfeedingatdifferentwatertofeedratiosonthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigs
AT ijlean effectofliquidfeedingatdifferentwatertofeedratiosonthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigs