Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs
The study examined the growth performance of pigs offered liquid feed or dry feed on either a restricted or an ad libitum basis, and whether their growth performance was further influenced by the water-to-feed ratio. The study was split into two parts to enable unrestricted (trial 1; n = 64) and res...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2008-01-01
|
Series: | Animal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175173110800253X |
_version_ | 1798032817720918016 |
---|---|
author | D. Hurst L. Clarke I.J. Lean |
author_facet | D. Hurst L. Clarke I.J. Lean |
author_sort | D. Hurst |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The study examined the growth performance of pigs offered liquid feed or dry feed on either a restricted or an ad libitum basis, and whether their growth performance was further influenced by the water-to-feed ratio. The study was split into two parts to enable unrestricted (trial 1; n = 64) and restricted (trial 2; n = 48) feeding to be compared. Male pigs were randomly allocated to six dietary treatment groups. A standard dry pellets diet (D) was offered either as: (i) unrestricted ration (UR); (ii) restricted ration (R); or D soaked in water at a feed-to-water ratio of (iii) 1 : 1.5 restricted (1 : 1.5 R); (iv) 1 : 3 unrestricted (1 : 3 UR); (v) 1 : 3 restricted (1 : 3 R); or (vi) 1 : 3 restricted with the addition of lactic acid to adjust the feed to pH 4 (1 : 3(4) R). Liquid feeding improved (P < 0.05) average daily live-weight gain (ADG) and lean tissue growth rate (LTGR) in the 1 : 3 UR compared with DUR but did not alter feed conversion ratio (FCR). Within the R groups, ADG were greater in all of the 1 : 3 diets, whereas feed intake, and hence FCR, was lower (P < 0.001) in these groups when offered the R ration. In conclusion, liquid feeding has a beneficial influence on the performance of modern porcine genotypes during the growth/finishing phase and this is further modulated by the water-to-feed ratio. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:19:03Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3a06147b93a8499f994ae2f0532e951b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1751-7311 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:19:03Z |
publishDate | 2008-01-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Animal |
spelling | doaj.art-3a06147b93a8499f994ae2f0532e951b2022-12-22T04:04:52ZengElsevierAnimal1751-73112008-01-012912971302Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigsD. Hurst0L. Clarke1I.J. Lean2Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London (Wye Campus) Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UKFaculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London (Wye Campus) Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UKFaculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London (Wye Campus) Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UKThe study examined the growth performance of pigs offered liquid feed or dry feed on either a restricted or an ad libitum basis, and whether their growth performance was further influenced by the water-to-feed ratio. The study was split into two parts to enable unrestricted (trial 1; n = 64) and restricted (trial 2; n = 48) feeding to be compared. Male pigs were randomly allocated to six dietary treatment groups. A standard dry pellets diet (D) was offered either as: (i) unrestricted ration (UR); (ii) restricted ration (R); or D soaked in water at a feed-to-water ratio of (iii) 1 : 1.5 restricted (1 : 1.5 R); (iv) 1 : 3 unrestricted (1 : 3 UR); (v) 1 : 3 restricted (1 : 3 R); or (vi) 1 : 3 restricted with the addition of lactic acid to adjust the feed to pH 4 (1 : 3(4) R). Liquid feeding improved (P < 0.05) average daily live-weight gain (ADG) and lean tissue growth rate (LTGR) in the 1 : 3 UR compared with DUR but did not alter feed conversion ratio (FCR). Within the R groups, ADG were greater in all of the 1 : 3 diets, whereas feed intake, and hence FCR, was lower (P < 0.001) in these groups when offered the R ration. In conclusion, liquid feeding has a beneficial influence on the performance of modern porcine genotypes during the growth/finishing phase and this is further modulated by the water-to-feed ratio.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175173110800253Xgrowth performanceliquid feedingpigs |
spellingShingle | D. Hurst L. Clarke I.J. Lean Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs Animal growth performance liquid feeding pigs |
title | Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs |
title_full | Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs |
title_fullStr | Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs |
title_short | Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs |
title_sort | effect of liquid feeding at different water to feed ratios on the growth performance of growing finishing pigs |
topic | growth performance liquid feeding pigs |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175173110800253X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhurst effectofliquidfeedingatdifferentwatertofeedratiosonthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigs AT lclarke effectofliquidfeedingatdifferentwatertofeedratiosonthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigs AT ijlean effectofliquidfeedingatdifferentwatertofeedratiosonthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigs |