Preclinical efficacy of immune-checkpoint monotherapy does not recapitulate corresponding biomarkers-based clinical predictions in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is resistant to most multimodal therapies. Clinical success of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has spurred interest in applying ICIs targeting CTLA4, PD1 or IDO1 against GBM. This amplifies the need to ascertain GBM's intrinsic susceptibility (or resistance) toward these...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abhishek D. Garg, Lien Vandenberk, Matthias Van Woensel, Jochen Belmans, Marco Schaaf, Louis Boon, Steven De Vleeschouwer, Patrizia Agostinis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-04-01
Series:OncoImmunology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2017.1295903
_version_ 1811204294281527296
author Abhishek D. Garg
Lien Vandenberk
Matthias Van Woensel
Jochen Belmans
Marco Schaaf
Louis Boon
Steven De Vleeschouwer
Patrizia Agostinis
author_facet Abhishek D. Garg
Lien Vandenberk
Matthias Van Woensel
Jochen Belmans
Marco Schaaf
Louis Boon
Steven De Vleeschouwer
Patrizia Agostinis
author_sort Abhishek D. Garg
collection DOAJ
description Glioblastoma (GBM) is resistant to most multimodal therapies. Clinical success of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has spurred interest in applying ICIs targeting CTLA4, PD1 or IDO1 against GBM. This amplifies the need to ascertain GBM's intrinsic susceptibility (or resistance) toward these ICIs, through clinical biomarkers that may also “guide and prioritize” preclinical testing. Here, we interrogated the TCGA and/or REMBRANDT human patient-cohorts to predict GBM's predisposition toward ICIs. We exploited various broad clinical biomarkers, including mutational or predicted-neoantigen burden, pre-existing or basal levels of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs), differential expression of immune-checkpoints within the tumor and their correlation with particular TILs/Treg-associated functional signature and prognostic impact of differential immune-checkpoint expression. Based on these analyses, we found that predictive biomarkers of ICI responsiveness exhibited inconsistent patterns in GBM patients, i.e., they either predicted ICI resistance (as compared with typical ICI-responsive cancer-types like melanoma, lung cancer or bladder cancer) or susceptibility to therapeutic targeting of CTLA4 or IDO1. On the other hand, our comprehensive literature meta-analysis and preclinical testing of ICIs using an orthotopic GL261-glioma mice model, indicated significant antitumor properties of anti-PD1 antibody, whereas blockade of IDO1 or CTLA4 either failed or provided very marginal advantage. These trends raise the need to better assess the applicability of ICIs and associated biomarkers for GBM.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T03:10:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a0cee7e7812429bb36bd26111abdbdf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2162-402X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T03:10:37Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series OncoImmunology
spelling doaj.art-3a0cee7e7812429bb36bd26111abdbdf2022-12-22T03:50:21ZengTaylor & Francis GroupOncoImmunology2162-402X2017-04-016410.1080/2162402X.2017.12959031295903Preclinical efficacy of immune-checkpoint monotherapy does not recapitulate corresponding biomarkers-based clinical predictions in glioblastomaAbhishek D. Garg0Lien Vandenberk1Matthias Van Woensel2Jochen Belmans3Marco Schaaf4Louis Boon5Steven De Vleeschouwer6Patrizia Agostinis7KU Leuven University of LeuvenKU Leuven University of LeuvenResearch Group – Experimental Neurosurgery & Neuroanatomy, KU Leuven University of LeuvenKU Leuven University of LeuvenKU Leuven University of LeuvenBioceros BVResearch Group – Experimental Neurosurgery & Neuroanatomy, KU Leuven University of LeuvenKU Leuven University of LeuvenGlioblastoma (GBM) is resistant to most multimodal therapies. Clinical success of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has spurred interest in applying ICIs targeting CTLA4, PD1 or IDO1 against GBM. This amplifies the need to ascertain GBM's intrinsic susceptibility (or resistance) toward these ICIs, through clinical biomarkers that may also “guide and prioritize” preclinical testing. Here, we interrogated the TCGA and/or REMBRANDT human patient-cohorts to predict GBM's predisposition toward ICIs. We exploited various broad clinical biomarkers, including mutational or predicted-neoantigen burden, pre-existing or basal levels of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs), differential expression of immune-checkpoints within the tumor and their correlation with particular TILs/Treg-associated functional signature and prognostic impact of differential immune-checkpoint expression. Based on these analyses, we found that predictive biomarkers of ICI responsiveness exhibited inconsistent patterns in GBM patients, i.e., they either predicted ICI resistance (as compared with typical ICI-responsive cancer-types like melanoma, lung cancer or bladder cancer) or susceptibility to therapeutic targeting of CTLA4 or IDO1. On the other hand, our comprehensive literature meta-analysis and preclinical testing of ICIs using an orthotopic GL261-glioma mice model, indicated significant antitumor properties of anti-PD1 antibody, whereas blockade of IDO1 or CTLA4 either failed or provided very marginal advantage. These trends raise the need to better assess the applicability of ICIs and associated biomarkers for GBM.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2017.1295903cancer immunotherapycopy-number alterations (cna)ctla4high-grade gliomaido1immune-checkpoint blockers (icbs)mutational burdenneoantigenpatient prognosispd1t cellstreg cells
spellingShingle Abhishek D. Garg
Lien Vandenberk
Matthias Van Woensel
Jochen Belmans
Marco Schaaf
Louis Boon
Steven De Vleeschouwer
Patrizia Agostinis
Preclinical efficacy of immune-checkpoint monotherapy does not recapitulate corresponding biomarkers-based clinical predictions in glioblastoma
OncoImmunology
cancer immunotherapy
copy-number alterations (cna)
ctla4
high-grade glioma
ido1
immune-checkpoint blockers (icbs)
mutational burden
neoantigen
patient prognosis
pd1
t cells
treg cells
title Preclinical efficacy of immune-checkpoint monotherapy does not recapitulate corresponding biomarkers-based clinical predictions in glioblastoma
title_full Preclinical efficacy of immune-checkpoint monotherapy does not recapitulate corresponding biomarkers-based clinical predictions in glioblastoma
title_fullStr Preclinical efficacy of immune-checkpoint monotherapy does not recapitulate corresponding biomarkers-based clinical predictions in glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Preclinical efficacy of immune-checkpoint monotherapy does not recapitulate corresponding biomarkers-based clinical predictions in glioblastoma
title_short Preclinical efficacy of immune-checkpoint monotherapy does not recapitulate corresponding biomarkers-based clinical predictions in glioblastoma
title_sort preclinical efficacy of immune checkpoint monotherapy does not recapitulate corresponding biomarkers based clinical predictions in glioblastoma
topic cancer immunotherapy
copy-number alterations (cna)
ctla4
high-grade glioma
ido1
immune-checkpoint blockers (icbs)
mutational burden
neoantigen
patient prognosis
pd1
t cells
treg cells
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2017.1295903
work_keys_str_mv AT abhishekdgarg preclinicalefficacyofimmunecheckpointmonotherapydoesnotrecapitulatecorrespondingbiomarkersbasedclinicalpredictionsinglioblastoma
AT lienvandenberk preclinicalefficacyofimmunecheckpointmonotherapydoesnotrecapitulatecorrespondingbiomarkersbasedclinicalpredictionsinglioblastoma
AT matthiasvanwoensel preclinicalefficacyofimmunecheckpointmonotherapydoesnotrecapitulatecorrespondingbiomarkersbasedclinicalpredictionsinglioblastoma
AT jochenbelmans preclinicalefficacyofimmunecheckpointmonotherapydoesnotrecapitulatecorrespondingbiomarkersbasedclinicalpredictionsinglioblastoma
AT marcoschaaf preclinicalefficacyofimmunecheckpointmonotherapydoesnotrecapitulatecorrespondingbiomarkersbasedclinicalpredictionsinglioblastoma
AT louisboon preclinicalefficacyofimmunecheckpointmonotherapydoesnotrecapitulatecorrespondingbiomarkersbasedclinicalpredictionsinglioblastoma
AT stevendevleeschouwer preclinicalefficacyofimmunecheckpointmonotherapydoesnotrecapitulatecorrespondingbiomarkersbasedclinicalpredictionsinglioblastoma
AT patriziaagostinis preclinicalefficacyofimmunecheckpointmonotherapydoesnotrecapitulatecorrespondingbiomarkersbasedclinicalpredictionsinglioblastoma