Which One Is More Effective for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions in Children? Pelvic Floor Contraction or Pelvic Floor Relaxation in Biofeedback Therapy

Objective:The objective of this study is to investigate the results of contraction- and relaxation-based biofeedback (BF) in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).Materials and Methods:Between 2007 and 2017, we randomly directed children with the diagnosis of LUTD and refractory to st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burak Köprü, Turgay Ebiloğlu, Giray Ergin, Engin Kaya, Yusuf Kibar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Urological Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access: http://jurolsurgery.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/which-one-s-more-effective-for-lower-urinary-tract/38727
_version_ 1797912113693327360
author Burak Köprü
Turgay Ebiloğlu
Giray Ergin
Engin Kaya
Yusuf Kibar
author_facet Burak Köprü
Turgay Ebiloğlu
Giray Ergin
Engin Kaya
Yusuf Kibar
author_sort Burak Köprü
collection DOAJ
description Objective:The objective of this study is to investigate the results of contraction- and relaxation-based biofeedback (BF) in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).Materials and Methods:Between 2007 and 2017, we randomly directed children with the diagnosis of LUTD and refractory to standard urotherapy modifications via BF by using two different animations: animation A with relaxation nature BF (RBF) and animation B with contraction nature BF (CBF). The categories of non-response, partial response, and full response were defined as a 0-49% decrease, 50-99% decrease, and 100% decrease in the LUTD Symptom score, respectively. Results of biofeedback using RBF or CBF were compared.Results:There were 100 and 70 children in the RBF and CBF groups, respectively. Patients with an abnormal voiding pattern (abnormalVP) and a positive electromyography (EMG) activity (positive EMG) had a better resolution with RBF (p=0.001), whereas patients with abnormalVP and a negative EMG activity (negative EMG) had a better resolution with CBF (p=0.039). Despite being statistically insignificant, patients with a normal voiding pattern (normalVP) and positive EMG had a better resolution with CBF (p=0.452), whereas patients with normalVP and negative EMG had a better resolution with RBF (p=0.083).Conclusion:The EMG activity identifies the BF nature in children with LUTD and abnormalVP. Importantly, positive EMG had better results with RBF, whereas negative EMG had better results with CBF.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T11:51:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a0f930deaec4ed0974fd291df47e08a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2148-9580
2148-9580
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T11:51:20Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Journal of Urological Surgery
spelling doaj.art-3a0f930deaec4ed0974fd291df47e08a2023-02-15T16:17:05ZengGalenos YayineviJournal of Urological Surgery2148-95802148-95802020-09-017321121710.4274/jus.galenos.2020.305413049054Which One Is More Effective for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions in Children? Pelvic Floor Contraction or Pelvic Floor Relaxation in Biofeedback TherapyBurak Köprü0Turgay Ebiloğlu1Giray Ergin2Engin Kaya3Yusuf Kibar4 Koru Ankara Hospital, Clinic of Urology, Ankara, Turkiye Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Urology, Ankara, Turkiye Koru Ankara Hospital, Clinic of Urology, Ankara, Turkiye Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Urology, Ankara, Turkiye Koru Ankara Hospital, Clinic of Urology, Ankara, Turkiye Objective:The objective of this study is to investigate the results of contraction- and relaxation-based biofeedback (BF) in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).Materials and Methods:Between 2007 and 2017, we randomly directed children with the diagnosis of LUTD and refractory to standard urotherapy modifications via BF by using two different animations: animation A with relaxation nature BF (RBF) and animation B with contraction nature BF (CBF). The categories of non-response, partial response, and full response were defined as a 0-49% decrease, 50-99% decrease, and 100% decrease in the LUTD Symptom score, respectively. Results of biofeedback using RBF or CBF were compared.Results:There were 100 and 70 children in the RBF and CBF groups, respectively. Patients with an abnormal voiding pattern (abnormalVP) and a positive electromyography (EMG) activity (positive EMG) had a better resolution with RBF (p=0.001), whereas patients with abnormalVP and a negative EMG activity (negative EMG) had a better resolution with CBF (p=0.039). Despite being statistically insignificant, patients with a normal voiding pattern (normalVP) and positive EMG had a better resolution with CBF (p=0.452), whereas patients with normalVP and negative EMG had a better resolution with RBF (p=0.083).Conclusion:The EMG activity identifies the BF nature in children with LUTD and abnormalVP. Importantly, positive EMG had better results with RBF, whereas negative EMG had better results with CBF. http://jurolsurgery.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/which-one-s-more-effective-for-lower-urinary-tract/38727 lutdbiofeedbackemg activityvoiding patterncontractionrelaxation
spellingShingle Burak Köprü
Turgay Ebiloğlu
Giray Ergin
Engin Kaya
Yusuf Kibar
Which One Is More Effective for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions in Children? Pelvic Floor Contraction or Pelvic Floor Relaxation in Biofeedback Therapy
Journal of Urological Surgery
lutd
biofeedback
emg activity
voiding pattern
contraction
relaxation
title Which One Is More Effective for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions in Children? Pelvic Floor Contraction or Pelvic Floor Relaxation in Biofeedback Therapy
title_full Which One Is More Effective for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions in Children? Pelvic Floor Contraction or Pelvic Floor Relaxation in Biofeedback Therapy
title_fullStr Which One Is More Effective for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions in Children? Pelvic Floor Contraction or Pelvic Floor Relaxation in Biofeedback Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Which One Is More Effective for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions in Children? Pelvic Floor Contraction or Pelvic Floor Relaxation in Biofeedback Therapy
title_short Which One Is More Effective for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions in Children? Pelvic Floor Contraction or Pelvic Floor Relaxation in Biofeedback Therapy
title_sort which one is more effective for lower urinary tract dysfunctions in children pelvic floor contraction or pelvic floor relaxation in biofeedback therapy
topic lutd
biofeedback
emg activity
voiding pattern
contraction
relaxation
url http://jurolsurgery.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/which-one-s-more-effective-for-lower-urinary-tract/38727
work_keys_str_mv AT burakkopru whichoneismoreeffectiveforlowerurinarytractdysfunctionsinchildrenpelvicfloorcontractionorpelvicfloorrelaxationinbiofeedbacktherapy
AT turgayebiloglu whichoneismoreeffectiveforlowerurinarytractdysfunctionsinchildrenpelvicfloorcontractionorpelvicfloorrelaxationinbiofeedbacktherapy
AT girayergin whichoneismoreeffectiveforlowerurinarytractdysfunctionsinchildrenpelvicfloorcontractionorpelvicfloorrelaxationinbiofeedbacktherapy
AT enginkaya whichoneismoreeffectiveforlowerurinarytractdysfunctionsinchildrenpelvicfloorcontractionorpelvicfloorrelaxationinbiofeedbacktherapy
AT yusufkibar whichoneismoreeffectiveforlowerurinarytractdysfunctionsinchildrenpelvicfloorcontractionorpelvicfloorrelaxationinbiofeedbacktherapy