Risk of injury analysis in depth jump and squat jump

Introduction: The depth jump (DJ) and squat jump (SJ) are accepted ways to assess and train power producing ability but are not without risk of injury. Methods: Sixteen male participants (age = 21.7 ± 1.54 yrs., height = 177.7 ± 11.4 cm, mass = 77.7 ± 13.6 kg) were evaluated for power exertion capab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Curtis L. Tomasevicz, Jeffrey C. Woldstad, David D. Jones
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alicante 2022-10-01
Series:Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jhse.ua.es/article/view/2022-v17-n4-risk-injury-analysis-depth-jump-squat-jump
_version_ 1797995716840259584
author Curtis L. Tomasevicz
Jeffrey C. Woldstad
David D. Jones
author_facet Curtis L. Tomasevicz
Jeffrey C. Woldstad
David D. Jones
author_sort Curtis L. Tomasevicz
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The depth jump (DJ) and squat jump (SJ) are accepted ways to assess and train power producing ability but are not without risk of injury. Methods: Sixteen male participants (age = 21.7 ± 1.54 yrs., height = 177.7 ± 11.4 cm, mass = 77.7 ± 13.6 kg) were evaluated for power exertion capabilities while being assessed for risk of injury in the knee and low back through a range of resistances based on a percentage of participants’ heights in the DJ (0% through 50%) and bodyweights for the SJ (0% through 100%). Two variables were used to assess the risk of injury in the knee: valgus angle and internal abduction moment (IAM). Four variables were used in the low back: compression and shear force at the L5/S1 vertebrae, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and erector muscle tension. Results: With increasing DJ drop height, participants showed increased risk of injury in the knee through the valgus angle and IAM. In the low back, significant correlation occurred between increasing drop height and the shear force and IAP while compression force and erector muscle tension were more correlated with the power exertion of the participants than the drop height. With increasing SJ resistance, no significant increased risk of knee injury was detected. However, all low back variables except the IAP were significantly influenced by the increased resistance. Conclusion: Risk of injury in the knee and low back can be strongly dependent not only on the type of jump, but also the amount of resistance. The resulting power exerted by the athlete can also influence the risk of injury.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T10:04:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a1d9eaee5a14580ba32fc5de4b3feb5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1988-5202
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T10:04:56Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher University of Alicante
record_format Article
series Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
spelling doaj.art-3a1d9eaee5a14580ba32fc5de4b3feb52022-12-22T04:30:15ZengUniversity of AlicanteJournal of Human Sport and Exercise1988-52022022-10-0117476178110.14198/jhse.2022.174.0513016Risk of injury analysis in depth jump and squat jumpCurtis L. Tomasevicz0Jeffrey C. Woldstad1David D. Jones2University of NebraskaSouth Dakota School of Mines and TechnologyUniversity of NebraskaIntroduction: The depth jump (DJ) and squat jump (SJ) are accepted ways to assess and train power producing ability but are not without risk of injury. Methods: Sixteen male participants (age = 21.7 ± 1.54 yrs., height = 177.7 ± 11.4 cm, mass = 77.7 ± 13.6 kg) were evaluated for power exertion capabilities while being assessed for risk of injury in the knee and low back through a range of resistances based on a percentage of participants’ heights in the DJ (0% through 50%) and bodyweights for the SJ (0% through 100%). Two variables were used to assess the risk of injury in the knee: valgus angle and internal abduction moment (IAM). Four variables were used in the low back: compression and shear force at the L5/S1 vertebrae, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and erector muscle tension. Results: With increasing DJ drop height, participants showed increased risk of injury in the knee through the valgus angle and IAM. In the low back, significant correlation occurred between increasing drop height and the shear force and IAP while compression force and erector muscle tension were more correlated with the power exertion of the participants than the drop height. With increasing SJ resistance, no significant increased risk of knee injury was detected. However, all low back variables except the IAP were significantly influenced by the increased resistance. Conclusion: Risk of injury in the knee and low back can be strongly dependent not only on the type of jump, but also the amount of resistance. The resulting power exerted by the athlete can also influence the risk of injury.https://www.jhse.ua.es/article/view/2022-v17-n4-risk-injury-analysis-depth-jump-squat-jumpkinematicskineticsknee assessmenttrunk assessmentdrop jumpl5/s1 vertebrae
spellingShingle Curtis L. Tomasevicz
Jeffrey C. Woldstad
David D. Jones
Risk of injury analysis in depth jump and squat jump
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
kinematics
kinetics
knee assessment
trunk assessment
drop jump
l5/s1 vertebrae
title Risk of injury analysis in depth jump and squat jump
title_full Risk of injury analysis in depth jump and squat jump
title_fullStr Risk of injury analysis in depth jump and squat jump
title_full_unstemmed Risk of injury analysis in depth jump and squat jump
title_short Risk of injury analysis in depth jump and squat jump
title_sort risk of injury analysis in depth jump and squat jump
topic kinematics
kinetics
knee assessment
trunk assessment
drop jump
l5/s1 vertebrae
url https://www.jhse.ua.es/article/view/2022-v17-n4-risk-injury-analysis-depth-jump-squat-jump
work_keys_str_mv AT curtisltomasevicz riskofinjuryanalysisindepthjumpandsquatjump
AT jeffreycwoldstad riskofinjuryanalysisindepthjumpandsquatjump
AT daviddjones riskofinjuryanalysisindepthjumpandsquatjump