Should We Accept Arguments from Skeptics to Ignore the Psi Data? A Comment on Reber and Alcock’s Searching for the Impossible
Reber and Alcock have recently made a sharp attack on the entire psi literature, and in particular a recent overview by Cardeña of the meta-analyses across various categories of psi. They claim the data is inherently flawed because of its disconnect with our current understanding of the world. As a...
Main Author: | George Robert Williams III |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SSE
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Scientific Exploration |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/1681 |
Similar Items
-
Reassessing the "Impossible": A Critical Commentary on Reber and Alcock's "Why Parapsychological Claims Cannot Be True"
by: Bryan J Williams
Published: (2019-12-01) -
"The Data Are Irrelevant”: Comment on Reber and Alcock (2019)
by: Etzel Cardeña
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Thought-Forms Gone Rogue: A Theory for Psi-Critics and Parapsychologists
by: Adrian Parker
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Blind Watchers of PSI: A Rebuttal of Reber and Alcock (2019)
by: Bernard Carr
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Future directions in precognition research: More research can bridge the gap between skeptics and proponents
by: Michael eFranklin, et al.
Published: (2014-08-01)