Clinical significance of para‐carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: The relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax

Abstract Background Para‐tracheal or para‐carinal air cysts (PACs) are often asymptomatic and usually detected incidentally by methods such as computed tomography. Their clinical significance is unclear in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE). Methods We evaluated the clinical signi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hideaki Yamakawa, Shintaro Sato, Hiroki Ohta, Makiko Takatsuka, Kenji Kusano, Rie Kawabe, Tomohiro Oba, Keiichi Akasaka, Masako Amano, Jun Araya, Hiroki Sasaki, Hidekazu Matsushima
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-08-01
Series:The Clinical Respiratory Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13671
_version_ 1797741396841463808
author Hideaki Yamakawa
Shintaro Sato
Hiroki Ohta
Makiko Takatsuka
Kenji Kusano
Rie Kawabe
Tomohiro Oba
Keiichi Akasaka
Masako Amano
Jun Araya
Hiroki Sasaki
Hidekazu Matsushima
author_facet Hideaki Yamakawa
Shintaro Sato
Hiroki Ohta
Makiko Takatsuka
Kenji Kusano
Rie Kawabe
Tomohiro Oba
Keiichi Akasaka
Masako Amano
Jun Araya
Hiroki Sasaki
Hidekazu Matsushima
author_sort Hideaki Yamakawa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Para‐tracheal or para‐carinal air cysts (PACs) are often asymptomatic and usually detected incidentally by methods such as computed tomography. Their clinical significance is unclear in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE). Methods We evaluated the clinical significance of PACs in PPFE and their relationship with pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax. Results In total, 50 patients had PPFE and 34 (68%) had PACs. Most PACs were para‐carinal (n = 30). A para‐tracheal air cyst was detected in only nine patients, which included five patients having both para‐carinal and para‐tracheal air cysts. Overall median survival was 24.7 months. Survival was not significantly different between the patients with [PACs(+)] and without PACs (P = 0.268). A high frequency (64%) of the complication of pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax occurred in the overall population during follow‐up. Pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax occurred significantly more frequently in patients with PACs(+) than in those without (76.5% vs. 37.5%; P = 0.012). PACs(+) was the only significant risk factor for pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax. Conclusions Our data showed that PACs commonly occur in patients with PPFE, and most PACs were para‐carinal air cysts. Additionally, PACs(+) was a significant risk factor for pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax; therefore, clinicians should be more aware of these complications during follow‐up examination, particular in PACs(+) patients with PPFE.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:26:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a21cc0a25bb49a8bcade6cebfc446d8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-6981
1752-699X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:26:06Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Clinical Respiratory Journal
spelling doaj.art-3a21cc0a25bb49a8bcade6cebfc446d82023-08-18T07:18:02ZengWileyThe Clinical Respiratory Journal1752-69811752-699X2023-08-0117880581010.1111/crj.13671Clinical significance of para‐carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: The relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothoraxHideaki Yamakawa0Shintaro Sato1Hiroki Ohta2Makiko Takatsuka3Kenji Kusano4Rie Kawabe5Tomohiro Oba6Keiichi Akasaka7Masako Amano8Jun Araya9Hiroki Sasaki10Hidekazu Matsushima11Department of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Red Cross Hospital Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Red Cross Hospital Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Red Cross Hospital Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Red Cross Hospital Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Red Cross Hospital Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Red Cross Hospital Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Red Cross Hospital Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Red Cross Hospital Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Red Cross Hospital Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Tokyo Jikei University Hospital Tokyo JapanDepartment of Radiology Saitama Cross Hospital Saitama JapanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine Saitama Red Cross Hospital Saitama JapanAbstract Background Para‐tracheal or para‐carinal air cysts (PACs) are often asymptomatic and usually detected incidentally by methods such as computed tomography. Their clinical significance is unclear in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE). Methods We evaluated the clinical significance of PACs in PPFE and their relationship with pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax. Results In total, 50 patients had PPFE and 34 (68%) had PACs. Most PACs were para‐carinal (n = 30). A para‐tracheal air cyst was detected in only nine patients, which included five patients having both para‐carinal and para‐tracheal air cysts. Overall median survival was 24.7 months. Survival was not significantly different between the patients with [PACs(+)] and without PACs (P = 0.268). A high frequency (64%) of the complication of pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax occurred in the overall population during follow‐up. Pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax occurred significantly more frequently in patients with PACs(+) than in those without (76.5% vs. 37.5%; P = 0.012). PACs(+) was the only significant risk factor for pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax. Conclusions Our data showed that PACs commonly occur in patients with PPFE, and most PACs were para‐carinal air cysts. Additionally, PACs(+) was a significant risk factor for pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax; therefore, clinicians should be more aware of these complications during follow‐up examination, particular in PACs(+) patients with PPFE.https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13671para‐carinal air cystspleuroparenchymal fibroelastosispneumomediastinumpneumothorax
spellingShingle Hideaki Yamakawa
Shintaro Sato
Hiroki Ohta
Makiko Takatsuka
Kenji Kusano
Rie Kawabe
Tomohiro Oba
Keiichi Akasaka
Masako Amano
Jun Araya
Hiroki Sasaki
Hidekazu Matsushima
Clinical significance of para‐carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: The relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax
The Clinical Respiratory Journal
para‐carinal air cysts
pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis
pneumomediastinum
pneumothorax
title Clinical significance of para‐carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: The relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax
title_full Clinical significance of para‐carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: The relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax
title_fullStr Clinical significance of para‐carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: The relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax
title_full_unstemmed Clinical significance of para‐carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: The relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax
title_short Clinical significance of para‐carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: The relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax
title_sort clinical significance of para carinal air cysts in patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis the relationship with pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax
topic para‐carinal air cysts
pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis
pneumomediastinum
pneumothorax
url https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13671
work_keys_str_mv AT hideakiyamakawa clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT shintarosato clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT hirokiohta clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT makikotakatsuka clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT kenjikusano clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT riekawabe clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT tomohirooba clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT keiichiakasaka clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT masakoamano clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT junaraya clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT hirokisasaki clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax
AT hidekazumatsushima clinicalsignificanceofparacarinalaircystsinpatientswithpleuroparenchymalfibroelastosistherelationshipwithpneumomediastinumandpneumothorax