Dorsolumbar Spinal infection: Surgery versus Conservative Treatment

Background: The spinal infection is defined as infection accompanied by the destruction of the vertebral bodies, starting at the endplate with secondary involvement of the intervertebral disks. Patients with spinal infection experience back pain with or without fever. Aim of the Work: The aim of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad Elmezain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta) 2021-07-01
Series:International Journal of Medical Arts
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_177951_fdd1a33d90e1c70e3d2250ef003a9048.pdf
_version_ 1831834172122988544
author Ahmad Elmezain
author_facet Ahmad Elmezain
author_sort Ahmad Elmezain
collection DOAJ
description Background: The spinal infection is defined as infection accompanied by the destruction of the vertebral bodies, starting at the endplate with secondary involvement of the intervertebral disks. Patients with spinal infection experience back pain with or without fever. Aim of the Work: The aim of the current study was to compare the results for both surgical interference and conservative methods in managing dorsolumbar spinal infections. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective study that included 30 patients with dorsolumbar spinal infection. They were admitted and managed at the Neurosurgery Department, Al-Azhar University hospitals and Health Insurance hospitals through the period of 2015 to 2020. Result: The disease was more common in males. Patient age ranged from 29 to 65 years. Diabetes mellitus was the most common reported comorbidity. The most affected region was the thoracic region followed by the lumbar region. Diagnosis was established bacteriologically for 32%. The average erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] in the first hour was 84.5 mm/hr, elevated in the second hour to 94mm/hr. C-reactive protein [CRP] level was greater than 10mg/L in all cases with an average of 55.8mg/L. All patients received more than 4 weeks of antibiotic therapy. The outcome was excellent to good outcome among 60% and 73.3%. Fair outcome was 13.3% and 20%, poor outcome, was 20% and 6.7%, and patients died was 6.7% and 0%, in conservative and surgical groups, respectively. Relapse developed in 10% of patients. Conclusion: ESR and CRP were very important in both diagnosis and follow-up [with CRP superior to ESR]. Surgery is superior than conservative treatment.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T04:09:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a3023ec511348438ea9879892305ef1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2636-4174
2682-3780
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T04:09:05Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)
record_format Article
series International Journal of Medical Arts
spelling doaj.art-3a3023ec511348438ea9879892305ef12022-12-21T18:00:33ZengAl-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)International Journal of Medical Arts2636-41742682-37802021-07-01331611161710.21608/ijma.2021.66161.1275177951Dorsolumbar Spinal infection: Surgery versus Conservative TreatmentAhmad Elmezain0Tanta Health Insurance Hospital, Ministry of Health, EgyptBackground: The spinal infection is defined as infection accompanied by the destruction of the vertebral bodies, starting at the endplate with secondary involvement of the intervertebral disks. Patients with spinal infection experience back pain with or without fever. Aim of the Work: The aim of the current study was to compare the results for both surgical interference and conservative methods in managing dorsolumbar spinal infections. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective study that included 30 patients with dorsolumbar spinal infection. They were admitted and managed at the Neurosurgery Department, Al-Azhar University hospitals and Health Insurance hospitals through the period of 2015 to 2020. Result: The disease was more common in males. Patient age ranged from 29 to 65 years. Diabetes mellitus was the most common reported comorbidity. The most affected region was the thoracic region followed by the lumbar region. Diagnosis was established bacteriologically for 32%. The average erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] in the first hour was 84.5 mm/hr, elevated in the second hour to 94mm/hr. C-reactive protein [CRP] level was greater than 10mg/L in all cases with an average of 55.8mg/L. All patients received more than 4 weeks of antibiotic therapy. The outcome was excellent to good outcome among 60% and 73.3%. Fair outcome was 13.3% and 20%, poor outcome, was 20% and 6.7%, and patients died was 6.7% and 0%, in conservative and surgical groups, respectively. Relapse developed in 10% of patients. Conclusion: ESR and CRP were very important in both diagnosis and follow-up [with CRP superior to ESR]. Surgery is superior than conservative treatment.https://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_177951_fdd1a33d90e1c70e3d2250ef003a9048.pdfspinal infectionvertebral osteomyelitisdisk space infectionspondylodiscitisepidural abscess
spellingShingle Ahmad Elmezain
Dorsolumbar Spinal infection: Surgery versus Conservative Treatment
International Journal of Medical Arts
spinal infection
vertebral osteomyelitis
disk space infection
spondylodiscitis
epidural abscess
title Dorsolumbar Spinal infection: Surgery versus Conservative Treatment
title_full Dorsolumbar Spinal infection: Surgery versus Conservative Treatment
title_fullStr Dorsolumbar Spinal infection: Surgery versus Conservative Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Dorsolumbar Spinal infection: Surgery versus Conservative Treatment
title_short Dorsolumbar Spinal infection: Surgery versus Conservative Treatment
title_sort dorsolumbar spinal infection surgery versus conservative treatment
topic spinal infection
vertebral osteomyelitis
disk space infection
spondylodiscitis
epidural abscess
url https://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_177951_fdd1a33d90e1c70e3d2250ef003a9048.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadelmezain dorsolumbarspinalinfectionsurgeryversusconservativetreatment