Responding to Xenophobic Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Barking Up the Wrong Tree?

This paper highlights the general failure to effectively respond to and prevent xenophobic violence in South Africa and offers critical reflections on reasons thereof. Drawing mainly on the evaluation of a number of anti-xenophobic programmes by government and civil society organisations, the paper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean Pierre Misago
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Western Cape 2021-04-01
Series:African Human Mobility Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epubs.ac.za/index.php/ahmr/article/view/765
_version_ 1818545945745293312
author Jean Pierre Misago
author_facet Jean Pierre Misago
author_sort Jean Pierre Misago
collection DOAJ
description This paper highlights the general failure to effectively respond to and prevent xenophobic violence in South Africa and offers critical reflections on reasons thereof. Drawing mainly on the evaluation of a number of anti-xenophobic programmes by government and civil society organisations, the paper argues that past and current interventions, instead of muzzling dogs that bite, have been rather barking up the wrong tree. National government and relevant local authorities have thus far either tended to ignore the problem or categorise violence against foreign nationals and other outsiders as normal crime with no need for more specific or more targeted interventions. Although well-intentioned, civil society efforts to foster peaceful cohabitation and tolerance through social dialogues and campaigns aimed at changing attitudes have also largely proven ineffective in reducing violence. There are many reasons why these interventions continue to fail. Chief among these reasons is the fact that interventions are not evidence-based and are not informed by a clear understanding of the drivers of the violence. Similarly, past and current responses and interventions are based on shaky foundations and untested theories of change. Indeed, by focussing almost exclusively on public attitudes, interventions neglect factors and motivations that trigger violent behaviour; perhaps ignoring that attitudes are not always a good predictor of behaviour. Without a clear understanding of the drivers of the violence and of what type of responses work or do not work, intervention strategies can only be ineffective at best, and counter-productive at worst.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T07:46:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a33a52d01b243d88a4d0545682eb69f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2411-6955
2410-7972
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T07:46:36Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher University of the Western Cape
record_format Article
series African Human Mobility Review
spelling doaj.art-3a33a52d01b243d88a4d0545682eb69f2022-12-22T00:32:35ZengUniversity of the Western CapeAfrican Human Mobility Review2411-69552410-79722021-04-012210.14426/ahmr.v2i2.765Responding to Xenophobic Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Barking Up the Wrong Tree?Jean Pierre Misago0University of the Witwatersrand This paper highlights the general failure to effectively respond to and prevent xenophobic violence in South Africa and offers critical reflections on reasons thereof. Drawing mainly on the evaluation of a number of anti-xenophobic programmes by government and civil society organisations, the paper argues that past and current interventions, instead of muzzling dogs that bite, have been rather barking up the wrong tree. National government and relevant local authorities have thus far either tended to ignore the problem or categorise violence against foreign nationals and other outsiders as normal crime with no need for more specific or more targeted interventions. Although well-intentioned, civil society efforts to foster peaceful cohabitation and tolerance through social dialogues and campaigns aimed at changing attitudes have also largely proven ineffective in reducing violence. There are many reasons why these interventions continue to fail. Chief among these reasons is the fact that interventions are not evidence-based and are not informed by a clear understanding of the drivers of the violence. Similarly, past and current responses and interventions are based on shaky foundations and untested theories of change. Indeed, by focussing almost exclusively on public attitudes, interventions neglect factors and motivations that trigger violent behaviour; perhaps ignoring that attitudes are not always a good predictor of behaviour. Without a clear understanding of the drivers of the violence and of what type of responses work or do not work, intervention strategies can only be ineffective at best, and counter-productive at worst. https://epubs.ac.za/index.php/ahmr/article/view/765South AfricaXenophobiaViolence
spellingShingle Jean Pierre Misago
Responding to Xenophobic Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Barking Up the Wrong Tree?
African Human Mobility Review
South Africa
Xenophobia
Violence
title Responding to Xenophobic Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Barking Up the Wrong Tree?
title_full Responding to Xenophobic Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Barking Up the Wrong Tree?
title_fullStr Responding to Xenophobic Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Barking Up the Wrong Tree?
title_full_unstemmed Responding to Xenophobic Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Barking Up the Wrong Tree?
title_short Responding to Xenophobic Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Barking Up the Wrong Tree?
title_sort responding to xenophobic violence in post apartheid south africa barking up the wrong tree
topic South Africa
Xenophobia
Violence
url https://epubs.ac.za/index.php/ahmr/article/view/765
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanpierremisago respondingtoxenophobicviolenceinpostapartheidsouthafricabarkingupthewrongtree