Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review
Abstract: This study aimed to assess the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations performed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in elderly patients. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. The records were searched until August 2020 in eight el...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica
2021-12-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401&tlng=en |
_version_ | 1818775106267119616 |
---|---|
author | Thaís Souza Maia Thamires Diogo Lima Walbert de Andrade Vieira Cauane Blumenberg Bernardo Antonio Agostini Gustavo Giacomelli Nascimento Luiz Renato Paranhos Murilo de Sousa Menezes |
author_facet | Thaís Souza Maia Thamires Diogo Lima Walbert de Andrade Vieira Cauane Blumenberg Bernardo Antonio Agostini Gustavo Giacomelli Nascimento Luiz Renato Paranhos Murilo de Sousa Menezes |
author_sort | Thaís Souza Maia |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract: This study aimed to assess the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations performed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in elderly patients. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. The records were searched until August 2020 in eight electronic bibliographic databases, and included randomized and non-randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with no restrictions on the language or year of publication. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted, summarized, collected for qualitative analysis, and evaluated for individual risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool. The literature search retrieved 5,186 records; however, only seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. The studies were published between 2002 and 2019. A total of 1,239 restorations were investigated at intervals of 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of follow-up. Some studies had a low risk of bias, while others had moderate and high risk of bias. In general, GIC restorations placed using ART were considered satisfactory. The 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates ranged from 81.3% to 97.2%, 72.2% to 94%, and 63% to 87%, respectively; additionally, the survival rate for the longest follow-up period (60 months) was 85%. Given the best evidence-based information regarding caries removal, we highlight the need to provide a conservative and effective technique for use in elderly patients. ART is a promising and viable alternative that guarantees the survival of restorations in elderly patients. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-18T10:51:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3a348126f6b5428a8a51ae2206283045 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1807-3107 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-18T10:51:46Z |
publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica |
record_format | Article |
series | Brazilian Oral Research |
spelling | doaj.art-3a348126f6b5428a8a51ae22062830452022-12-21T21:10:26ZengSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa OdontológicaBrazilian Oral Research1807-31072021-12-013510.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0130Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic reviewThaís Souza Maiahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1932-346XThamires Diogo Limahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9215-0641Walbert de Andrade Vieirahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8872-2865Cauane Blumenberghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4580-3849Bernardo Antonio Agostinihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4480-1873Gustavo Giacomelli Nascimentohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-6300Luiz Renato Paranhoshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-0120Murilo de Sousa Menezeshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5912-310XAbstract: This study aimed to assess the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations performed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in elderly patients. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. The records were searched until August 2020 in eight electronic bibliographic databases, and included randomized and non-randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with no restrictions on the language or year of publication. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted, summarized, collected for qualitative analysis, and evaluated for individual risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool. The literature search retrieved 5,186 records; however, only seven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. The studies were published between 2002 and 2019. A total of 1,239 restorations were investigated at intervals of 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of follow-up. Some studies had a low risk of bias, while others had moderate and high risk of bias. In general, GIC restorations placed using ART were considered satisfactory. The 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month survival rates ranged from 81.3% to 97.2%, 72.2% to 94%, and 63% to 87%, respectively; additionally, the survival rate for the longest follow-up period (60 months) was 85%. Given the best evidence-based information regarding caries removal, we highlight the need to provide a conservative and effective technique for use in elderly patients. ART is a promising and viable alternative that guarantees the survival of restorations in elderly patients.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401&tlng=enDental Atraumatic Restorative TreatmentAgedGeriatric DentistryGlass Ionomer CementsRoot Caries |
spellingShingle | Thaís Souza Maia Thamires Diogo Lima Walbert de Andrade Vieira Cauane Blumenberg Bernardo Antonio Agostini Gustavo Giacomelli Nascimento Luiz Renato Paranhos Murilo de Sousa Menezes Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review Brazilian Oral Research Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Aged Geriatric Dentistry Glass Ionomer Cements Root Caries |
title | Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
title_full | Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
title_short | Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients: a systematic review |
title_sort | survival of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in the elderly patients a systematic review |
topic | Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Aged Geriatric Dentistry Glass Ionomer Cements Root Caries |
url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100401&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thaissouzamaia survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentrestorationsintheelderlypatientsasystematicreview AT thamiresdiogolima survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentrestorationsintheelderlypatientsasystematicreview AT walbertdeandradevieira survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentrestorationsintheelderlypatientsasystematicreview AT cauaneblumenberg survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentrestorationsintheelderlypatientsasystematicreview AT bernardoantonioagostini survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentrestorationsintheelderlypatientsasystematicreview AT gustavogiacomellinascimento survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentrestorationsintheelderlypatientsasystematicreview AT luizrenatoparanhos survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentrestorationsintheelderlypatientsasystematicreview AT murilodesousamenezes survivalofatraumaticrestorativetreatmentrestorationsintheelderlypatientsasystematicreview |