Impacts of Driving Conditions on EV Battery Pack Life Cycle

The aging of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is a crucial issue and must be investigated. The aging rate of LIBs depends not only on the material and electrochemical performance but also on the working conditions. In order to assess the impact of vehicle driving conditions, including the driving cycle,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huijun Liu, Fenfang Chen, Yuxiang Tong, Zihang Wang, Xiaoli Yu, Rui Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-02-01
Series:World Electric Vehicle Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/11/1/17
_version_ 1828748775672250368
author Huijun Liu
Fenfang Chen
Yuxiang Tong
Zihang Wang
Xiaoli Yu
Rui Huang
author_facet Huijun Liu
Fenfang Chen
Yuxiang Tong
Zihang Wang
Xiaoli Yu
Rui Huang
author_sort Huijun Liu
collection DOAJ
description The aging of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is a crucial issue and must be investigated. The aging rate of LIBs depends not only on the material and electrochemical performance but also on the working conditions. In order to assess the impact of vehicle driving conditions, including the driving cycle, ambient temperature, charging mode, and trip distance on the battery life cycle, this paper first establishes an electric vehicle (EV) energy flow model to solve the operating parameters of the battery pack while working. Then, a powertrain test is carried out to verify the simulation model. Based on the simulated data under different conditions, the battery capacity fade process is estimated by using a semi-empirical aging model. The mileage (Ф) traveled by the vehicle before the end of life (EOL) of the battery pack is then calculated and taken as the evaluation index. The results indicate that the Ф is higher when the vehicle drives the Japanese chassis dynamometer test cycle JC08 than in the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) and the Federal Test Procedure (FTP-75). The Ф will be dramatically reduced at both low and high ambient temperatures. Fast charging can increase the Ф at low ambient temperatures, whereas long trip driving can always increase Ф to varying degrees.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T05:26:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a37f32fbcf6439b9e49318beca8cf78
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2032-6653
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T05:26:10Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series World Electric Vehicle Journal
spelling doaj.art-3a37f32fbcf6439b9e49318beca8cf782022-12-22T02:09:57ZengMDPI AGWorld Electric Vehicle Journal2032-66532020-02-011111710.3390/wevj11010017wevj11010017Impacts of Driving Conditions on EV Battery Pack Life CycleHuijun Liu0Fenfang Chen1Yuxiang Tong2Zihang Wang3Xiaoli Yu4Rui Huang5College of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaCollege of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaCollege of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaCollege of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaCollege of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaCollege of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, ChinaThe aging of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is a crucial issue and must be investigated. The aging rate of LIBs depends not only on the material and electrochemical performance but also on the working conditions. In order to assess the impact of vehicle driving conditions, including the driving cycle, ambient temperature, charging mode, and trip distance on the battery life cycle, this paper first establishes an electric vehicle (EV) energy flow model to solve the operating parameters of the battery pack while working. Then, a powertrain test is carried out to verify the simulation model. Based on the simulated data under different conditions, the battery capacity fade process is estimated by using a semi-empirical aging model. The mileage (Ф) traveled by the vehicle before the end of life (EOL) of the battery pack is then calculated and taken as the evaluation index. The results indicate that the Ф is higher when the vehicle drives the Japanese chassis dynamometer test cycle JC08 than in the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) and the Federal Test Procedure (FTP-75). The Ф will be dramatically reduced at both low and high ambient temperatures. Fast charging can increase the Ф at low ambient temperatures, whereas long trip driving can always increase Ф to varying degrees.https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/11/1/17electric vehiclelithium-ion batterylife cycle assessmentdriving condition
spellingShingle Huijun Liu
Fenfang Chen
Yuxiang Tong
Zihang Wang
Xiaoli Yu
Rui Huang
Impacts of Driving Conditions on EV Battery Pack Life Cycle
World Electric Vehicle Journal
electric vehicle
lithium-ion battery
life cycle assessment
driving condition
title Impacts of Driving Conditions on EV Battery Pack Life Cycle
title_full Impacts of Driving Conditions on EV Battery Pack Life Cycle
title_fullStr Impacts of Driving Conditions on EV Battery Pack Life Cycle
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of Driving Conditions on EV Battery Pack Life Cycle
title_short Impacts of Driving Conditions on EV Battery Pack Life Cycle
title_sort impacts of driving conditions on ev battery pack life cycle
topic electric vehicle
lithium-ion battery
life cycle assessment
driving condition
url https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/11/1/17
work_keys_str_mv AT huijunliu impactsofdrivingconditionsonevbatterypacklifecycle
AT fenfangchen impactsofdrivingconditionsonevbatterypacklifecycle
AT yuxiangtong impactsofdrivingconditionsonevbatterypacklifecycle
AT zihangwang impactsofdrivingconditionsonevbatterypacklifecycle
AT xiaoliyu impactsofdrivingconditionsonevbatterypacklifecycle
AT ruihuang impactsofdrivingconditionsonevbatterypacklifecycle